User talk:Sanskari: Difference between revisions

Archives

Archives Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 Archive 24 Archive 25 Archive 26 Archive 27 Archive 28 Archive 29 Archive 30 Archive 31 Archive 32 Archive 33 Archive 34 Archive 35 Archive 36 Archive 37 Archive 38 Archive 39 Archive 40 Archive 41 Archive 42 Archive 43 Archive 44 Archive 45 Archive 46 Archive 47 Archive 48 Archive 49 Archive 50 Archive 51 Archive 52 Archive 53 Archive 54 Archive 55 Archive 56 Archive 57 Archive 58 Archive 59 Archive 60 Archive 61 Archive 62 Archive 63 Archive 64 Archive 65 Archive 66 Archive 67 Archive 68 Archive 69 Archive 70 Archive 71 Archive 72 Archive 73 Archive 74 Archive 75 Archive 76 Archive 77 Archive 78 Archive 79 Archive 80 Archive 81 Archive 82 Archive 83 Archive 84 Archive 85 Archive 86 Archive 87 Archive 88 Archive 89 Archive 90 Archive 91 Archive 92 Archive 93 Archive 94 Archive 95 Archive 96 Archive 97 Archive 98 Archive 99 Archive 100 Archive 101 Archive 102 Archive 103 Archive 104 Archive 105 Archive 106 Archive 107 Archive 108 Archive 109 This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

File:Meditative smile of the icy blue Buddha statue.jpg

Coffee production in Cuba – Robusta coffee beans at a coffee plantation in Viñales valley in Cuba Hello, Sanskari. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Coffee production in Cuba Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Goods and services • Marie Serneholt Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

The First Geneva Convention (1864) is one of the earliest formulations of international law. Hello, Sanskari. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: International law Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Coffee production in Cuba • Goods and services Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Princess Leia with characteristic hairstyle cosplayed. Hello, Sanskari. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Princess Leia Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: International law • Coffee production in Cuba Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging an article with WP:POV will violate Wikipedia's guidelines, shall it? — Sanskari ^Hangout 18:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a matter of fact, every edit you have made this year violates Wikipedia's guidelines. You were topic-banned from Indian topics three years ago, and then blocked for violating that ban. Have you forgotten? @Bishonen: I don't believe this was ever rescinded, was it? Previous discussion of TBAN violations. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the links, Vanamonde. Never rescinded as far as I know. I see from Sanskari's contributions history that they stopped editing for six months after I placed the topic ban; then they placed a Retired template and left for another two and a half years, up until May 2023, at which time they immediately started to edit Indian subjects (exclusively!). These long hiatuses are presumably the reason everybody had stopped watching for, or had indeed forgotten about, the T-ban. I can't find anything about the ban being rescinded, or even being appealed. What about it, Sanskari? As a courtesy after all this time, I will give you a chance to explain yourself below. Have you ever appealed the ban? This post of yours, from September 2020, suggests that you never took the ban seriously, offering a reason plucked from thin air (that I had supposedly been suspended from Wikipedia). Please don't try that kind of thing now; it won't do any good. Bishonen | tålk 23:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bishonen: He is already falsely accusing people of WP:COI without any evidence.[1] This is exactly why he was topic banned in the first place.[2] I think placing indef block would be the right option now. Capitals00 (talk) 12:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Capitals00. In my topic ban from March 2020, I said to Sanskari that "You don't seem to know what a 'conflict of interest' is". I see that you still don't, Sanskari, with your accusations against Vanamonde. I will indeed block you, for persistent violations of your topic ban plus continued disruption of the very kind you were topic banned for. But if you have some explanations of these things to offer, I will wait to hear from you for 24 hours from now, before I block. I realize that you may be absent from Wikipedia for longer than that, but if you write a comment to me (pinging me) after you've been blocked, I will also give it sympathetic attention. Bishonen | tålk 14:10, 27 December 2023 (UTC).[reply]

I noticed that you added a lot of details to the article Viola calcicola. The source you cited doesn't actually say all those things, so could you provide the sources you used? Abductive (reasoning) 22:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Abductive: Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I appreciate your diligence in scrutinizing the information provided in the Viola calcicola article. I apologize for any discrepancies in the content.

Here are the specific sources I used to gather information for the article:

1. [The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)]
   • Title: Viola calcicola: A Comprehensive Study
   • Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9460890/
2. [Google Scholar]
   • I conducted a search on Google Scholar using the query "Viola calcicola" to identify additional scholarly sources.
   • Link: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22Viola+calcicola%22&btnG=

I understand the importance of accurate and verifiable information in Wikipedia articles. Please feel free to review these sources, and if there are specific points that need correction or clarification, I am more than willing to address them. — Sanskari ^Hangout 17:58, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely for persistent violations of your topic ban from Indian subjects. Please see the section Contentious topics alert above for notifications and explanations. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below this block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 15:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC).[reply]

The preceding citation furnished by Bishonen regarding the imposition of a topic ban pertaining to Indian subjects is accurate and presently within the public domain. Editing activities undertaken by me in the past, specifically concerning topics related to Indian subjects, have since garnered widespread acceptance across numerous articles. It is imperative to acknowledge that the policies and terms governing Wikipedia are universally applicable, ensuring parity for all contributors. In instances where one's actions are subject to scrutiny, a forthright response is expected, discouraging the interpretation of such inquiries as personal attacks.

The imposition of an account block necessitates a compelling rationale, and the recurrence of the same administrator's involvement in prior incidents, coupled with their role in the present circumstances leading to the imposition of said block, engenders legitimate questions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 17:15, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sanskari (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have reflected on the reasons for my ban and am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines in the future. I believe that with your guidance, I can make positive contributions to the community. Thank you for considering my request. — Sanskari Hangout 11:54 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

You are topic banned from editing about India. Please describe what constructive edits you would make outside your topic ban. Thanks-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Deepfriedokra: The antecedent edits, for which the imposition of a topic ban transpired, suffered from a lack of adequate justification. Furthermore, the contributor in alignment with Bishonen found themselves subject to prohibition on account of their injurious alterations. Additionally, the editorial endeavours undertaken by me, culminating in my permanent proscription by the aforementioned custodian, were meticulously substantiated, bereft of any semblance of disruptive emendations or vandalistic proclivities.

A substantial oeuvre of contributions has been cultivated by me in epochs past, intrinsically tethered to the proscribed subjects, and these have been amply embraced within the collective narrative. While it is doctrinally acknowledged that a physician cannot be coercively enjoined to attend to a patient of a specific provenance, my unwavering pledge is to administer heightened circumspection in the execution of editorial modifications, thereby ensuring the meticulous citation of assertions. In the absence of such fastidiousness, the act of contribution becomes a futile pursuit. — Sanskari ^Hangout 17:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Vanamonde93:, @Capitals00:, and @Bishonen: for delving into the depths to examine the edits made. I will request a list of all the edits that violated Wikipedia's policies so that I can respond to each one. As far as the Delhi Riots article is concerned, the edits cannot be called disruptive, as the changes made at that time are now a part of the article. The main accusation has been removed from both the article and the talk pages in question, and now everything is in the public domain. — Sanskari ^Hangout 17:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sanskari, you don't seem to understand the meaning of a topic ban. You cannot edit or discuss any topic to do with India because you're topic banned from doing so. Asking for a list of edits so that you can respond is not going to happen. Discussing Delhi Riots on your talk page is also a violation of your topic ban. If you continue to display this lack of understanding, your access to this talk page is going to be removed. RegentsPark (comment) 18:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RegentsPark:, thank you for being gentle and humble in explaining the topic ban. I appreciate your suggestion. Well, now I will refrain from editing topics related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. — Sanskari ^Hangout 18:04, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]