User talk:50.42.182.54: Difference between revisions

Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you removed topically-relevant content from Talk:Tea Party movement. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Also don't refactor other people's talk page comments. Millahnna (talk) 00:27, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Let me look. No intention to remove anything. Just a moment, please. 50.42.182.54 (talk) 00:28, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I got it backwards. I should have notified you of this for your edit to Red Dawn (2011 film). Apologies for the confusion. Since it is a quote, we leave the swearing. But editing other user's comments on the talk page for the Tea Party article (again for swearing) is also not OK. Millahnna (talk) 00:31, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What? It appears there is something wrong with wp.

My only addition to the Talk:TP was ...

There is a similar question by Special:Contributions/99.181.138.215 above this one. 50.42.182.54 (talk) 00:25, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Nothing was intended to be removed by me. 50.42.182.54 (talk) 00:34, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Contributions/Millahnna you appear to be confused also. What I see on Red Dawn (2011 film) is me removing a redline of the writer, which already appears in the box on the right. 50.42.182.54 (talk) 00:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming the wp problem has passed, I've taken the liberty of readding my intended comment on Talk:TPm. If I don't hear back I'll assume that is okay. 50.42.182.54 (talk) 00:42, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently you are unable to type the word " @#!*% ". (That's H-E-L-L.) If that's the case, would you please refrain from editing Wikipedia articles which contain that word. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:55, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't editing any words. See this whole talk page. 50.42.182.54 (talk) 00:58, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. You weren't, but your browser or ISP is. Please stop. Please also consider this a level 4 warning, per WP:COMPETENCE, whether it's you or your browser. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:02, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Tea Party movement with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.   — Jeff G.  ツ 00:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There appears to be something wrong with the Talk:Tea Party movement page. I only added to quote above (see box), but both times other issues happened ... two other edits showed

::::::::::::: @#!*% . — goethean ॐ 15:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

one of the two was within this section. Strange. Can you notify whomever deals with coding/whatever problems? It wasn't me (twice). 50.42.182.54 (talk) 00:50, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• For all intents and purposes, and whether or not solar flares are involved, you are refactoring comments on the talk page, and that's never a good thing. There's another thing--I don't understand your edit summaries. I appreciate you taking the time to write them, but I assure you that other editors benefit more from sentences and phrases that describe your edits. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Welcome, it is appearently a party now. Maybe you should say cosmic rays, and learn that computer software processing isn't always perfect, before you make wild accusations, Drmies. >:-( 50.42.182.54 (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]