Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikortsminda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. YechielMan 19:59, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nikortsminda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Listed on WP:PNT since April 19; per PNT, articles listed longer than 2 weeks should be sent to AfD Akradecki 03:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I've removed the untranslated Georgian text (obviously if someone with abilities in that language happens along, all the better) and started work on a replacement page. Essentially, we're dealing with a place which contains a very famous and very attractive church and which also doubles as an archbishopric. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per changes by BigHaz. No reason to delete it anymore. Someguy1221 08:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, of course, and hats off to BigHaz for a nice display of initiative. I suggest this afd be withdrawn or closed early. nadav 09:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per as nom and all above R_Orange 16:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and withdraw nom - too bad it took an AfD to get someone to do this. It was listed at WP:PNT for about a month with no action. Akradecki 17:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.