This template is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature
I believe it makes the template overly huge to include links to every header for every character. It also lacks precedent, at least in my view. For instnace, the video game series {{Metal Gear}} only links to the main list of character articles. The same goes for all the individual {{Final Fantasy}} templates. Templates are supposed to be as streamlined and compact as possible and linking every character goes against that apparent philiosophy. hbdragon88 (talk) 01:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe that is an 'apparent philosphy', but it's not a written rule you have to follow. An example of a template like this is {{Twilight (series)}}, which lists all the main characters and supporting characters. The only different with this series is that it has more supporting characters. The template doesn't include every character either, in fact, within each respective book, these characters would be considered main characters. As for why all the characters link to the same page, they link to theri respective headings under the page. ~ BellaSwan00:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I guess until something is standardized, it's on a template by template basis. I can't think of how to resolve this short of asking for a WP:THIRD opinion. hbdragon88 (talk) 20:59, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've changed it to have a 'Minor Characters' heading with portagonists and antagonists under it. What do you think? ~ BellaSwan?13:49, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]