Talk:S corporation
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
This page is no longer disputed
If anyone still has questions about S corporations, please post them and I will answer with citations.
Grimmbusiness (talk) 10:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
I'd say it's still disputed, but I just stumbled across this ... The page is clearly incorrect in many factual aspects. An S corporation isn't a corporation at all. Subchapter S is the portion of IRC that allowa a tax election under federal tax law. Subchapter S applies to C corporations and non-corporations as well, such as LLCs. There is no clarification of this anywhere in the article. A reasonable person comes away with the strong impression that an S corporation is an actual corporation and not a federal tax election. The article is written as if every S corporation is a corporation. It's not.
Number of Shareholders
hello ı am a student ın T.R.N.C. I want to ask a questıon what ıs the benefits of small busıness? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.175.149.55 (talk • contribs) on 28 December 2005.
It is my understanding that an S-corporation can have no more than 75 shareholders —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.205.120.103 (talk • contribs) on 21 May 2006.
100 or more is past the limit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.98.164.140 (talk • contribs) on 6 July 2006.
You should take an English or Grammer class. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.146.91.6 (talk • contribs) on 11 September 2006.
The limit used to be 75, however, recently, this was changed to 100.
Maybe you should take a class as well. First, the correct spelling is grammar, not grammer. Second, your sentence structure should read:
"The limit used to be 75, however, this was recently changed to 100." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.123.228.107 (talk • contribs) on 26 December 2006.
Correct, the limit for shareholders is 100 [1]RAKinsler (talk) 00:35, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
LLCs
Shouldn't the intro be modified to make clear not all LLCs are S corps? How's this language, "An S corporation or S-corp is a corporation, some limited liability companies, or other ..." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Have Gun, Will Travel (talk • contribs) 19:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC).
- Actually, I would argue that the language is merely listing the kinds of entities that could elect to be S corps. Maybe we can come up with some kind of language that makes clear that many LLCs are treated as partnerships for Federal income tax purposes. Stay tuned. Yours, Famspear 19:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
An LLC is not a corporation. "An LLC is not a corporation. ...", limited liability company. I don't see anything in the statue which suggests that a LLC can make a Subchapter S election. ``97.64.209.102 I have changed the "Qualification for S corporation status" section accordingly. 25 October 2013 (UTC)Terry Thorgaard (talk) 22:52, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles