Generic pronouns and sexist language: The oxymoronic character of masculine generics

• APA Publication Manual Task Force. (1977). Guidelines for nonsexist language in APA journals: Publication Manual change sheet 2. American Psychologist, 32, 487–494.

  Google Scholar 

• Bem, S., & Bem, D. (1973). Does sex-biased job advertising “aid and abet” sex discrimination? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 6–18.

  Google Scholar 

• Bendix, E. (1979). Linguistic model as political symbols: Gender and the generic “he” in English. In J. Orasanu, M. Slater, & L. Adler (Eds.), Language, sex and gender: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (Vol. 327). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

  Google Scholar 

• Blaubergs, M. (1980). An analysis of classic arguments against changing sexist language. In C. Kramarae (Ed.), The voice of women and men. New York: Permagon Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Bodine, A. (1975). Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular “they,” sex-indefinite “he” and “he or she.” Language in Society, 4, 129–146.

  Google Scholar 

• Briere, J., & Lanktree, C. (1983). Sex-role related effects of sex bias in language. Sex Roles, 9, 625–632.

  Google Scholar 

• Brooks, L. (1983). Sexist language in occupational information: Does it make a difference? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23, 227–232.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cole, C., Hill, F., & Dayley, L. (1983). Do masculine pronouns used generically lead to thoughts of men? Sex Roles, 9, 737–749.

  Google Scholar 

• Collins, R. (1977). Language, history, and the legal process: A profile of the “reasonable man.” Camden Law Journal, 8, 312–323.

  Google Scholar 

• Creech, B., & Wilson, R. (1979). Occupational stereotyping and the sexist effects of pronouns. Unpublished manuscript, North Carolina State University.

• Dillard, J. (1989). Unpublished raw data. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.

• Faggen-Steckler, J., McCarthy, K., & Tittle, C. (1974). A quantitative method for measuring sex “bias” in standardized tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 11, 151–161.

  Google Scholar 

• Goldsmith, A. (1980). Notes on the tyranny of language usage. In C. Kramarae (Ed.), The voices of women and men. New York: Pergamon Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Graham, A. (1973). The making of a nonsexist dictionary. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

  Google Scholar 

• Harrison, L. (1975). Cro-magnon woman—In eclipse. Science Teacher, 42, 8–11.

  Google Scholar 

• Heilbrun, A. (1981). Human sex-role behavior. New York: Pergamon Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hill, A. (1986). Mother tongue, father time. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kidd, V. (1971). A study of the images produced through the use of male pronouns as the generic. Moments in Contemporary Rhetoric and Communications, 1, 25–30.

  Google Scholar 

• Kramarae, C. (1981). Women and men speaking. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• MacKay, D. (1980a). On the goals, principles, and procedures for prescriptive grammar. Language and society, 9, 349–367.

  Google Scholar 

• MacKay, D. (1980b). Psychology, prescriptive grammar, and the pronoun problem. American Psychologist, 35, 444–449.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• MacKay, D. (1983). Prescriptive grammar and the pronoun problem. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

  Google Scholar 

• MacKay, D., & Fulkerson, D. (1979). On the comprehension and production of pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 661–673.

  Google Scholar 

• Martyna, W. (1978). What does “he” mean? Use of the generic masculine. Journal of Communication, 28, 131–138.

  Google Scholar 

• Martyna, W. (1983). Beyond the “he/man” approach: The case for nonsexist language. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender, and society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

  Google Scholar 

• Moulton, J., Robinson, G., & Cherin, E. (1978). Psychology in action: Sex bias in language use: “Neutral” pronouns that aren't. American Psychologist, 33, 1032–1036.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nilsen, A. (1977). Sexism in children's books and elementary teaching materials. In A. Nilsen, H. Bosmajian, H. Gershuny, & J. Stanley (Eds.), Sexism and language. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

  Google Scholar 

• Pincus, A., & Pincus, R. (1980). Linguistic sexism and career education. Language Arts, 57, 70–76.

  Google Scholar 

• Ritchie, M. (1975). Alice through the statues. McGill Law Journal, 21.

• Schneider, J., & Hacker, S. (1973). Sex-role imagery and use of the generic “man” in introductory texts: A case in the sociology of sociology. The American Sociologist, 8, 12–18.

  Google Scholar 

• Sheplack, N., Ogden, D., & Tobin-Bennett, D. (1976). Students' perceptions of career as a function of gender cues. Unpublished paper, Indiana University.

• Silveira, J. (1980). Generic masculine words and thinking. In C. Kramarae (Ed.), The voice of women and men. New York: Pergamon Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Sniezek, J., & Jazwinski, C. (1986). Gender bias in English: In search of fair language. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16(7), 642–662.

  Google Scholar 

• Soto, D. (1976, November). Alternatives to using masculine pronouns when referring to the species. Paper presented at the 46th annual meeting of the Western Speech Communication Association, San Francisco.

• Stericker, A. (1981). Does this “he or she” business really make a difference? The effect of masculine pronouns as generics on job attitudes. Sex Roles, 7, 637–641.

  Google Scholar 

• Strunk, W., & White, E. B. (1979). The elements of style. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.

  Google Scholar 

• Switzer, J. Y. (1990). The impact of generic word choices: an empirical investigation of age- and sex-related differences. Sex Roles, 22, 69–82.

  Google Scholar 

• Whorf, B. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Todd-Mancillas, W. (1981). Masculine generics = sexist language. Communication Quarterly, 29(2), 107–115.

  Google Scholar 

• Todd-Mancillas, W., & Meyers, K. (1980, May). The effects of inclusive/exclusive language on reading comprehension, perceived human interest, and likelihood of inclusive pronoun usage. Paper presented at the 30th annual International Communication Association, Acapulco, Mexico.

Download references