Content deleted Content added
Jack Brooks (talk | contribs) Some spelling, paragraph changes; some deletions (article is too long). |
|||
Line 23:
==Plot==
===Part One===
With [[Aunt May]] in dire condition after being inadvertently shot by a sniper during the closing hours of the Superhero Civil War, Peter is forced to ask [[Iron Man|Tony Stark]] for financial assistance. Iron Man first attempts to bring Peter in for opposing the Superhero Registration Act, but stops when he learns of May's situation. He listens to Peter, but tells him he can't help him
===Part Two===
Line 29:
===Part Three===
Peter talks to the little girl, who makes cryptic remarks to Peter, and runs off. While going after her, Peter encounters two men; An overweight software tester who says he wishes he were a hero, and a middle-aged technology magnate, who says he'd give up all his fortune just to be with a girl he'd known and lost years ago. Peter then encounters a woman in red, who tells him that the two men he met were from alternate possible timelines where Peter was never bitten by the radioactive
===Part Four===
Peter and Mary Jane agree to the deal after several hours lamenting over the decision, but Mary Jane whispers to Mephisto that she can offer him something in return for removing the knowledge of Peter's identity from the world. Before sealing the deal, Mephisto reveals that the little girl was a representation of Peter and Mary Jane's possible child. Mary Jane reassures Peter that the two will find each other again, and history is altered so that Peter and Mary Jane never married and Spider-Man never unmasked. Peter wakes up alone in bed, living again with Aunt May.
==Development==
Line 42:
==Reception==
''One More Day'' has been universally panned by critics. [[IGN]] reviewer Jesse Schedeen described ''Amazing Spider-Man'' #545
Given the controversial nature of the story, IGN also published two "Additional Take" reviews for ''Amazing Spider-Man'' #545. {| class="toccolours" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:23em; max-width: 25%;" cellspacing="5"
Line 49 ⟶ 51:
| style="text-align: left;" |— Jesse Schedeen of IGN.<ref name=IGN545/>
|}
Like IGN, [[Newsarama]] published the opinions of several members of their review team.
Kevin Huxford felt betrayed by Marvel, who had previously promised there would be no retcon in the year or two following Spider-Man's unmasking. He claimed that "you can feel editorial mandate dripping from this" and that Peter Parker "may forever be remembered for having such tunnel vision about his aunt that he pissed away his wife, unborn child, and happiness". Lucas Seigel found the story "utterly ridiculous"; he pointed out that while Joe Quesada has a no-smoking policy for Marvel heroes in case it encourages children to smoke, he has no problem with Peter Parker making a deal with the devil for selfish reasons. Richard Renteria felt that the story's conclusion was a missed opportunity "to add a new layer of guilt to Peter’s already rocky life by allowing May to finally have the send off she deserves" and worried that the retcon foreshadowed similar endings to upcoming stories like ''[[Secret Invasion]]''. Troy Brownfield agreed with the opinions of his colleagues that the storyline damaged Marvel continuity and Spider-Man's decision was "selfish and childish", not to mention "a big middle finger to the idea of marriage in comics". He speculated preferable endings to the story before concluding that "As it stands, Peter, MJ, May . . . and the readers . . . all got a raw deal."<ref name=NewsaramaBestShots>{{cite web|last=Siegel|first=Lucas|coauthors=J. Caleb Mozzocco, Keven Huxford, Richard Renteria, Troy Brownfield|publisher=[[Newsarama]]|url= http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=141416|title= Best Shots: The One More Day Roundtable|date=[[2007-12-31]]|accessdate=2008-01-02}}</ref> A more positive view came from Brandon Thomas, who felt that ''One More Day'' was "an incredibly well-told story". He praised the writing, in particularly the morally ambiguous decision Peter has to make and the way he and Mary Jane deal with it together, as well as Quesada's art, which he felt set the tone of "guilt, regret, and despair". In regards to the retcon, he claimed that "Peter Parker being married really isn’t a vital component of the mythos" and that it allowed Marvel to make "big, sweeping changes to bring things slightly more into focus and back on message".<ref name=NewsaramaBNB>{{cite web|last=Thomas|first=Brandon|[Newsarama]]|url=http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=141633|title=Ambidextrous #239: Brand New Bag|date=[[2008-01-02]]|accessdate=2008-01-05}}</ref> Similarly Wizard Magazine although praising the art have stated that the retcon was horribly done comparing it to "the biggest cheat since ‘Dallas’ when J.R. getting shot was all a dream". <ref>[http://www.wizarduniverse.com/magazine/wizard/006978727.cfm?page=3 Wizard Entertainment - Book of the Week Amazing #545]</ref>
Response from comic book fans to the story was negative from the outset; Joe Quesada had been on record for some time as disliking the marriage of Peter and Mary-Jane, and it was assumed that this story would be his way of splitting the Parkers up-an assumption that was ultimately validated. The actual means by which the separation occurred, however, whipped fans into such a frenzy that within two weeks of the issue's release, the Marvel.Com forums (while still
==References==
|