Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 193.235.73.194 - "→Plagiarism: " |
|||
Line 138:
:It is not really necessary. However, I know of two rational reasons to varnish. In some cases the surface of the painting can show differences in gloss; if this is undesired to obtain a uniform reflection you'll have to varnish. The other reason is that though dirt can easily be removed from the acrylic paint layer using water as a solvent, the water may degrade the carrier, e.g. canvas or paper. Organic solvents pose less of a threat in this respect — but they'll temporarily soften the acrylic, making it slightly susceptible to abrasion during the cleaning process. Nothing much to worry about but precious museum pieces had better be varnished, if this can be reconciled with the authenticity of the artwork.--[[User:MWAK|MWAK]] ([[User talk:MWAK|talk]]) 16:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
I have removed this unreferenced section it has little value as far as I van see?<span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''<font color="Black">[[User:Teapotgeorge|Teapot]]</font>'''<font color="silver">[[User:Teapotgeorge|george]]</font></span>[[User talk:Teapotgeorge|<sup><font color="blue">Talk</font></sup>]] 22:11, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
|