Talk:Dornier Flugzeugwerke
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dornier Flugzeugwerke article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bombardier building Dornier?
editHi, I heard, that Bombardier is building something at the former Dornier-plant now, possibly planes or parts, does anybody have any information on this? Quatzalcoatl 20:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Missing aircraft: Dornier Do 29
editHello.
I was searching Wikipedia for the Dornier Do 29 which flew in 1958 as a STOL research plane. I typed it into the search and ended up with info on a completely unrelated aircraft which was proposed by Dornier and was designed under the exact same designation. I went to the Dornier page only to find that the Do 29 I was looking for was not there! This is absurd. How come it isn't listed there? How come there's another unrelated Do 29 here?
Can someone please answer.
EADS
editIs there a source for the EADS acquisition? The article does not give any citations, and the claim seem to be contradicted by Fairchild Aircraft and M7 Aerospace, both of which claim that M7 acquiried Dornier in 2003. Vectro (talk) 10:56, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Stub-class assessment
editI was going to give this page Start-class, but I decided against it seeing as there are only three citations for the entire length of the page, despite supporting material. Future editors, heed this: if this page is to advance in class assessment, you must fix its syntax errors and thoroughly wikify it with research and writing of encyclopedic quality. –Vami_IV✠ 19:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)