Talk:Institute for Scientific Information

According to the article ISI is now called Thomson Scientific for which there is a separate article. So this article could be about the organisation prior to it becoming Thomson Scientific, yet it is mostly written in the present tense. Should this article be merged with Thomson Scientific or should it be rewritten about ISI as it used to exist? Nurg (talk) 10:31, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

This article definitely needs a history section if it is to remain a separate article. Science Citation Index (SCI) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) were pioneering projects, although it took the further advancement of computer technology to realize their full utility. It is difficult to believe that there are not a number of scholarly articles discussing this. Otherwise this article should be folded into Thomson Scientific, as Nurg has suggested as well as into Science Citation Index, et al. --Bejnar (talk) 15:10, 3 December 2009 (UTC). I do believe that both pages should be merged. The ISI highly cited is probably the most comprehensive writeup about the topic. The highly cited page now in wikipedia is rather skimpy. 134.105.176.102 (talk) 12:39, 26 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Institute of Scientific Information (ISI), today known as Thomson Scientific, was established by Eugene Garfield, who devised a means of using citation analysis to identify the top experts in all social science and science field. The Institute publishes the Social Science Citation Index and the Science Citation Index. Both are available via DIALOG. Using these tools, it is possible to create a living directory of the top published experts, and through them, of the top unpublished experts.

• ISINET Home Page

Both articles are really short, and their "Highly Cited" database is just one of their products. Merge here per WP:CORP. This was also suggested by User:Tony1 in this discussion. Pcap ping 10:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

• Support merge. The other article is short and is a content fork from this one.—Finell 02:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
• Support Absolutely. No need for a separate article. --Crusio (talk) 14:34, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
• Support This makes sense to me. Walter Siegmund (talk) 14:45, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

  ที่ตั้ง 2405:9800:B940:2F23:946C:2CA2:8F2E:9C80 (talk) 17:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

• - think about: the other article is not well named: the point is not the highly cited researcher, but the website and the database; it should be renamed: ISI Highly Cited or ISIHighlyCited.com, the name of the website 188.99.122.20 (talk) 19:50, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Institute for Scientific Information. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160504183851/https://scholarlyoa.com/2016/04/28/the-tr-master-journal-list-is-not-a-journal-whitelist/ to https://scholarlyoa.com/2016/04/28/the-tr-master-journal-list-is-not-a-journal-whitelist//

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply