Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Breikss

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 23:04, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Breikss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable internet marketer - I can't find any substantial coverage in RS as is required to meet WP:BIO. (Clean up of paid editor Trident13). SmartSE (talk) 20:42, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, as the nominator says, there's scant coverage about Breikss (despite his unusual surname). The best is the one article in the Vacouver Sun, which is largely about his grandparents. The other sources are either by him, or about something else other than him. Fails WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 00:17, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:53, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:53, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:53, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:53, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as although I found links at News, Books and browser, there's nothing to suggest better but feel free to draft and userfy if needed. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Promotional and badly sourced, without evidence of passing either WP:PROF or WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:47, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.