Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ronald2010/Silviu Ionescu: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:15, 5 April 2010

User:Ronald2010/Silviu Ionescu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete This was no better in user space than it was anywhere else. It's a blow-by-blow retelling of a tabloid story and has no place on Wikipedia, it fails WP:NPOV and WP:BLP by a wide margin. We do not need articles written by people whose sole professed purpose on Wikipedia is to document a purported scandal involving a living individual. Guy (Help!) 15:15, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ronald2010/Silviu Ionescu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Copy of a page recently deleted as a G10 attack page, I don't see it being improved as I have the feeling it is exactly as the author wanted it. As I am not quite sure if we should delete it or what to do if anything I am opening a discussion here, personally I am for deletion. Off2riorob (talk) 15:06, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment (from deleting admin) - the page (Silviu Ionescu) was too G10 to remain, but that doesn't mean it can't be improved. I don't think we should be deleting things because someone has "the feeling it is exactly as the author wanted it". I also suggested that MfD might be the right venue, but I'd rather we actually ask and then listen to the answer. I've opened that discussion at User talk:Ronald2010. Frank | talk 15:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====[[User:Ronald2010/Silviu Ionescu]]====
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was  '''Delete''' This was no better in user space than it was anywhere else. It's a blow-by-blow retelling of a tabloid story and has no place on Wikipedia, it fails [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:BLP]] by a wide margin. We do not need articles written by people whose sole professed purpose on Wikipedia is to document a purported scandal involving a living individual. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 15:15, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
+* {{lu|Ronald2010/Silviu Ionescu}}
 Copy of a page recently deleted as a G10 attack page,  I don't see it being improved as I have the feeling it is exactly as the author wanted it. As I am not quite sure if we should delete it or what to do if anything I am opening a discussion here, personally I am for deletion. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 15:06, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 :'''Comment''' (from deleting admin) - the page ([[Silviu Ionescu]]) was too G10 to remain, but that doesn't mean it can't be improved. I don't think we should be deleting things because someone has "the feeling it is exactly as the author wanted it". I also suggested that MfD might be the right venue, but I'd rather we actually ''ask'' and then listen to the answer. I've opened ''that'' discussion at [[User talk:Ronald2010]]. <small><span style="padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000">[[User:Frank|<span style="color:cyan;background:blue">&nbsp;Frank&nbsp;</span>]]&nbsp;{{!}}&nbsp;[[user_talk:Frank|<span style="color:blue;background:cyan">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 15:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>