Talk:Three-dimensional electrical capacitance tomography: Difference between revisions
Polyamorph (talk | contribs) m Polyamorph moved page Talk:Three-dimensional electrical capacitance tomography (3D-ECT) to Talk:Three-dimensional electrical capacitance tomography without leaving a redirect: Requested by WolfgangNihil at WP:RM/TR: Unnecessarily added an acronym. Page without acronym already exists and redirects to same article |
→Requested move 14 May 2024: new section |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{WikiProject Medicine |importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject Medicine |importance=Low}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Requested move 14 May 2024 == |
|||
{{requested move/dated|Electrical capacitance volume tomography}} |
|||
[[Three-dimensional electrical capacitance tomography]] → {{no redirect|Electrical capacitance volume tomography}} – This page was originally titled "Electrical capacitance volume tomography" and was recently moved to a page called "Three-dimensional electrical capacitance tomography". These two terms are not the same. The latter is a broader term as shown in the wikipedia article edit on 5/14/24 in the introduction section. References are given for the distinction between terms. When the page was moved to the new term, it stated that the term ECVT is not widely used. However, in the later 5/14/24 edit of the introduction, citations are given for the term being used in China, Indonesia, and three different research groups in the USA. It is suggested that this page return to "Electrical capacitance volume tomography". A separate page should be made for "Three-dimensional electrical capacitance tomography", if desired, as it is a distinct term that can include stacking of 2D tomographs whereas ECVT does not. [[User:Marashdeh|Marashdeh]] ([[User talk:Marashdeh|talk]]) 15:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:29, 14 May 2024
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 14 May 2024
 | It has been proposed in this section that Three-dimensional electrical capacitance tomography be renamed and moved to Electrical capacitance volume tomography. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Three-dimensional electrical capacitance tomography → Electrical capacitance volume tomography – This page was originally titled "Electrical capacitance volume tomography" and was recently moved to a page called "Three-dimensional electrical capacitance tomography". These two terms are not the same. The latter is a broader term as shown in the wikipedia article edit on 5/14/24 in the introduction section. References are given for the distinction between terms. When the page was moved to the new term, it stated that the term ECVT is not widely used. However, in the later 5/14/24 edit of the introduction, citations are given for the term being used in China, Indonesia, and three different research groups in the USA. It is suggested that this page return to "Electrical capacitance volume tomography". A separate page should be made for "Three-dimensional electrical capacitance tomography", if desired, as it is a distinct term that can include stacking of 2D tomographs whereas ECVT does not. Marashdeh (talk) 15:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)