Talk:Koreans in Vietnam

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Korea Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Southeast Asia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Vietnam This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Koreans in Vietnam appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 April 2007. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that Koreans in Vietnam form that country's second-largest group of expatriates after the Taiwanese? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/April.

The following sentence is not precise: "In September 2006, South Korean conglomerate Kumho Engineering and Construction broke ground at Asiana Plaza, a 32-story complex which, when completed, is expected to be Vietnam's largest building at least until 2010"

i really doubt you know of all the building projects in vietnam. are you really sure that from the korean-built house is finished, until the skyscraper in hanoi is finished in 2010, there will not be built any other houses that are higher than the korean-built one? i don't think so. if you are, list the source. the statement is therefore an assumption, and an encyclopedia should not list such assumptions as facts. i suggest you revert the article to the way it was originally after the info about the skyscraper in hanoi was added. Tridungvo 00:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold. I went ahead and removed it myself since on second thought, I don't really think information about construction projects has anything to do with understanding about Koreans in Vietnam. Cheers, cab 00:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following deserves mentioning in the main article. I am unable to provide the source of refererence, as I've lost contact to the friend who gave the text to me a few years back. Apparently, it was translated from Vietnamese, published in a weekly journal.

The Korean historian Chung Dong Yu in 1805 wrote of an event occurring 118 years earlier. In 1687, year of the cat, a Korean ship manned by a 24-man crew somehow stranded in a far-away water after 35 days floating on the Pacific Ocean in bad weather. Surrounded by boats full of soldiers and communicating in writing (using Chinese characters) they were told they had landed in the waters of Dai Viet, Hoi An district of Minh Duc prefecture. The 21 Korean survivors were given food, shelter and allowed to move freely during their stay in the far-away land. They were even introduced to the district chancellor, who offered for them to stay and whose beautiful young wife impressed them with her knowledge of Chinese writing. In 1688, year of the dragon, they safely returned to Korea to tell of a friendly and peaceful Dai Viet (unaware of the truce between north and south being in force at the time then).

203.58.21.26 (talk) 01:29, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. The hankyoreh(hani.co.kr) references itself are not qualified references. It is not admit by Korea and Vietnam both. It is a POV and lacking evidence. The original author of Hankyoreh newspaper was a 구수정(Goo soo-jung), this 'young female student' outside writer wrote her own basless, exaggerated news by her assumption. Even her was(and is) not a official writer of hankyoreh newspaper, it was a 'outside contributed' article. Generally, newpaper have no responsible for 'outside contributed' article. and newspaper is not guarantee 'external essay' is true.
2. the hankyoreh essay itself have no evidence. There is no offical group and academic source confirmed this essay is 'true'. and The group of Vietnam soldiers officially denied Hankyoreh news, and says this news was "distorted and baseless".[1] The essay contains her own original research.
3. The controversial and contested, non-academic sources are not regard as reliable sources. it should not be presented as simple statements of fact.
4. According to Wikipedia:Reliable sources, "If a topic has no reliable sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." 660gd4qo (talk) 15:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Like most ethnic group, Korean doesn't have a plural in English dictionary. In Merriam Webster, Korean, is defined as native of Korea. There's no entry of Koreans. Likewise, there's no plural of Indian(s), Chinese (Chineses) Japanese(Japaneses) Vietnamese(s) etc. Therefore, to move Koreans in Vietnam to Korean in Vietnam, which is more grammatically safe and ethnically acceptable, shouldn't cost much or hurt anybody's feeling, I hope. Clari 2010 (talk) 15:03, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no plural entry for "airplane" in the dictionary either. That does not mean that "airplanes" is grammatically incorrect. In English, "Korean" can refer to both the language of Korea and a singular person of Korean descent, and is thus somewhat ambiguous. "Koreans" however can only mean those from Korean descent. In the case of Chinese and Japanese, the morpheme "s" is not added and instead we say "the Chinese" or "the Japanese" to indicate plural. (75.65.220.204 (talk) 21:59, 1 September 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Koreans in Vietnam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.iht.com/articles/1996/09/16/viet.t_0.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051031031111/http://kshcm.net:80/ to http://www.kshcm.net

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Koreans in Vietnam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081201111114/http://www.hamline.edu/~rkagan/Publications_Asian%20Literary%20Views%20on%20Vietnam.html to http://www.hamline.edu/~rkagan/Publications_Asian%20Literary%20Views%20on%20Vietnam.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060212042424/http://www.okf.or.kr/data/status_AS.jsp to http://www.okf.or.kr/data/status_AS.jsp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]