Talk:Japan Airlines

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved including "Japan Air Lines Cargo Flight 1628 incident" as we already have "Japan Airlines Cargo Flight 1045". Regards, —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 10:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Japan Airlines Flight 2 → Japan Air Lines Flight 2
• Japan Airlines Flight 351 → Japan Air Lines Flight 351
• Japan Airlines Flight 471 → Japan Air Lines Flight 471
• Japan Airlines Flight 472 (1972) → Japan Air Lines Flight 472 (1972)
• Japan Airlines Flight 446 → Japan Air Lines Flight 446
• Japan Airlines Flight 404 → Japan Air Lines Flight 404
• Japan Airlines Cargo Flight 1045 → Japan Air Lines Cargo Flight 1045
• Japan Airlines Flight 715 → Japan Air Lines Flight 715
• Japan Airlines Flight 472 (1977) → Japan Air Lines Flight 472 (1977)
• Japan Airlines Flight 350 → Japan Air Lines Flight 350
• Japan Airlines Flight 123 → Japan Air Lines Flight 123
• Japan Airlines Flight 1628 incident → Japan Air Lines Cargo Flight 1628 incident

– There was a spacing in between 'Air' and 'Lines' as seen in the livery itself and it wasn't changed until the 1989 livery was used. And per our norm, we do also include a spacing such as Swiss International Air Lines, Delta Air Lines, Korean Air Lines etc. All above pages mentioned are affected. KlientNo.1 (talk) 03:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 03:40, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable, the article says the name changed in 2004. Not sure about Japan Air Lines Cargo in these titles it doesnt appear to be a seperate airline, the NTSB report for 1045 makes no mention of a seperate airline and it used the standard "Japan Air" callsign. . MilborneOne (talk) 07:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is this discussion doing here? it looked as though you wanted to move the Japan Airlines article. Putting it in the right place and making it clearer that the events in question date back to before the new livery would save people some time figuring it out. --Deeday-UK (talk) 09:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deeday-UK: Sorry, wasn't sure where to put it as there were so many articles to cover. And since we do have airlines separated from the main passenger airline such as Korean Air Cargo or Lufthansa Cargo, this will also probably come into that category. KlientNo.1 (talk) 12:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also I moved the page of Japan Airlines Cargo Flight 8054 to Japan Airlines Cargo Flight 1045 because I'm not sure from which source did flight 8054 come from. Per official JAL source, it is flight 1045: [1]. KlientNo.1 (talk) 06:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Japan Airlines Cargo is not an official airline just a brand neither is Korean Air Cargo but Lufthansa Cargo is (seperate article and it has its own ICAO Code and callsign. So we really need to remove the cargo from the JAL ones. MilborneOne (talk) 08:59, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MilborneOne: Sorry for not responding in a while, was a bit busy. But I'm fine with removing the 'cargo' word from the article name. Although, guess we can do that for Korean Air Cargo Flight 6316 and Korean Air Cargo Flight 8509. KlientNo.1 (talk) 06:34, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Support but Denied JAL Cargo per reason above. 101.10.2.232 (talk) 03:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong support, including for Japan Airlines Cargo, which is the identical airline but qualified as cargo. Did a bit of OR on this and it seems quite clear that the airline was in fact called Japan Air Lines and not Japan Airlines, and considering that thi is clear on the lettering of all the photographs that show the fuselage I am not sure why it took so long for us to get to this point. Ex nihil ^(talk) 08:39, 15 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]