User talk:Lemonademan22

Hello, Lemonademan22 and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image •The missing manual Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost, our newspaper • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi @Lemonademan22. Please do not simply add bare URLs. These are lazy references and subject to linkrot. Templates such as {{cite web}} and {{cite news}} should be used. 183.171.123.86 (talk) 17:41, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Kalebcooperwalking.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://www.alamy.com/kaleb-cooper-at-the-big-feastival-2022-on-alex-james-cotswolds-farm-kingham-oxfordshire-photo-by-joshua-james-image480389964.html?imageid=3ECD9B10-4660-4386-9F44-2B1801C71B71&p=1948632&pn=1&searchId=5c4ee5f350baa277f77758c820733413&searchtype=0 and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 16:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lemonademan22! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you make me into an admin? I have info with sources in the last "talk" comment suggestion in Rhea Ripley's page BJavierPR (talk) 00:05, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I do apologise for the very late reply. But I myself am not an admin and I do not even have the requirements to be one so I cannot make you an admin. Apologies for the incovenience and late reply. I do recommend talking to the editors that you see edit all the articles. Maybe they are admins? Hope this helps! Lemonademan22 (talk) 23:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pentagón Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Best Friends. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited King of the Ring (1996), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page McMahon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Article needs reliable, secondary sources to establish notability according to Wikipedia's guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AEW Title Tuesday and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lemonademan22! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:KipSabianJan2024.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:KipSabianInJanuary2024.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. I have addressed what is needed and required on both the file page and it's talk page. Lemonademan22 (talk) 22:02, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can we not block people from editing? I hate it when they change things based on their imagination. BJavierPR (talk) 22:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to need you to be more specific here. Which article are you referring to and are your referring to me or another editor? Lemonademan22 (talk) 21:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also bear in mind you must stick to Wikipedia's policy and guidelines and not base edits on original research or use bare URLs and unverified claims, but always should include and use reliable sources to back up your edits. HookFTW (talk) 21:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Users can only be WP:BLOCKed by WP:ADMINISTRATORs; moreover, since blocks are supposed to be preventive not punitive, they're only made when there's really good policy-based reason for doing so. In most cases, there's some substantial discussion that takes place (typically at one of the administrator noticeboards), and evidence in forms of WP:DIFFs need to be provided in support of any claims made. Administrators do have some discretion when it comes to blocks and may do so without warning when they feel its necessary to prevent serious disruption or policy violations, but even those blocks are subject to review. Administrator involvement is mainly limited to serious matters (repeated behavioral issues, repeated major policy violations, etc.) and is typically seen as the last resort. An attempt to resolve any disagreements over article content and other minor things should, at least at first, be made in accordance with Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

It's a good idea for anyone seeking to have another user blocked to take a look at WP:ANI advice before starting the process because things can quickly get messy once it begins. Many users are shocked when the discussion they start WP:BOOMERANGs back onto them and their actions start being discussed. It's not uncommon for someone requesting a block to end up being blocked themselves because their actions are considered to also be inappropriate. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What i'm saying is that the Bloodline against Sami Zayn, The Usos and Roman Reigns WarGames match is legit. But both groups need a fifth member, which StrangerMan123 already agreed about the match existing. 166.181.86.240 (talk) 20:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it's unsourced you gotta watch SmackDown last night, when Solo brought the challenge to Roman Reigns, which he pointed out, "There's only four of you". It could be true. But they could've accepted already. 166.181.86.240 (talk) 20:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that. WWE, however, needs to announce that there is an offical War Games match for us to add it. Lemonademan22 (talk) 00:38, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thank you. Also about 2-3 ago (i think) StrangerMan123 added a source i'll check that rq. 2600:1700:9AA2:4540:9444:F9E:29B2:27F5 (talk) 01:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was a link to Fightful. Fightful is usually a reliable source when WWE doesnt add a match. But they usually do sometimes. Take 3 examples from this year. 2 from SummerSlam and one from Bad Blood. It took 5-6 days to add the Cody Rhodes against Solo Sikoa for the Undisputed WWE Championship onto the WWE website. And it took 2-3 days to get the Rhea Ripley against Liv Morgan for the Women's World Championship onto the site. And it took 2 weeks to get the Nia Jax VS Bayley onto the WWE Website for Bad Blood (NOTE: Nia Jax didnt have a number one contender until the time they added the match to the site.) All are different situations. 2600:1700:9AA2:4540:9444:F9E:29B2:27F5 (talk) 01:12, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lemonademan22. Thank you for your work on Chain wrestling. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:03, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: It isn't mentioned in the target page because "Chain wrestling" is another word for "Catch wrestling". Both are exactly the same, just different words, which is why I created a redirect. Lemonademan22 (talk) 11:57, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We shouldn't be surprising readers. Please add a mention of this on the target page, with a good reference. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:01, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AEW Title Tuesday and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 16:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Full Gear (2024), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Garcia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits, but we shouldn't really be adding "as of" for stuff that happened years ago. Joe Gacy was not on Raw in 2020. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He signed to the company in 2020. I also thought the consensus was you should put "As of" in wrestlers' bios. Has that now changed? Lemonademan22 (talk) 18:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not aware of any consensus for that. In regards to Gacy, you wrote "As of August 2020, he is signed to WWE, on the Raw brand" which isn't true. He wasn't on Raw in 2020. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked what the consensus is on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling as I believe it was mentioned to put it but that could just be a mistake on my end, as for Gacy I did not see that, I thought I put "As of August 2020 he is signed to WWE." but obviously not. Lemonademan22 (talk) 19:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AEW Title Tuesday, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sceptre (talk) 19:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I haven't done much AFC reviewing so this is an ad hoc acceptance. I was going to create this article anyway, but you'd done the leg work, so you deserve the attribution. Sceptre (talk) 19:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that, thank you. Lemonademan22 (talk) 19:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions. Have you read our PW style guide? Per WP:PW/CAREER: "Summarize the major events and key points of the wrestler's career. Avoid writing in proseline ("week-by-week" format) and adding excessive details." Not every ppv or special episode appearance is notable. A random appearance/match with no storyline is non-notable and it is just WP:FAN. Also, please don't add unnecessary dates/proseline/week-by-week format. Dates are only necessary when we talk about a specific episode or moment. PPVs and special episodes have their own detailed articles with their date. --Mann Mann (talk) 02:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you. I will try my best. Lemonademan22 (talk) 12:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate in Vote: Inclusion of inaugural/final champion in Championships and accomplishments. Regards. --Mann Mann (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thanksgiving Eve Dynamite (2024), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bryan Keith.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You gotta give us a source that SAYS they are done as a team. YOUR definition don't count. 2001:8003:5130:2601:21E0:1F07:C614:2903 (talk) 08:53, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have already admitted wrong. I find this message rather unnecessary. Lemonademan22 (talk) 22:00, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]