Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SG5536B (talk | contribs) at 04:50, 12 December 2024 (Osceola County, Florida: Requesting semi-protection of Osceola County, Florida.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip's going back and fourth changing information. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 19:26, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:51, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing (spam links, vandalism etc.) mixed in with some good faith IP edits. Protection log shows that disruption has been ongoing for many years, perhaps a case for long-term pending changes? Entranced98 (talk) 19:41, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps indefinite pending changes? I would wait for others to reply first. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:44, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 01:20, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – While this is a bit extraordinary, there are many unregistered/IP users who appear to be complaining about the map in their own section on the talk page, rendering the talk page very long and the conversation scattered. If the page could be protected, and users directed to the map discussion on Commons, I think this would effectively improve the encyclopedia and the maintenance thereof. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Suspected socks are running an edit war.––kemel49(connect)(contri) 20:41, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of ip vandalism in last few days [[1]], [[2]], [[3]] etc. Theonewithreason (talk) 20:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hello. Given that this article has been the victim not only of sockpuppets but also a bone of contention who claim that one did this and the other that, avoiding good coexistence, teamwork and contributing to Wikipedia; I request through this message that the the block is only and exclusively for Extended confirmed users. With this we continue to avoid more problems, although I do not understand why you should delete editions with their sources just because it was done by a sockpuppet. Thank you. JeanMercier90 (talk) 22:13, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by IP hopper. CycloneYoris talk! 22:22, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued IP vandalism (2803.xx) since previous PP expired. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 22:46, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 23:01, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock immediately started editing the article after it was unprotected. mwwv converseedits 23:30, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target, resumed within 2 hours. Leonidlednev (TCL) 23:52, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruptive LTA returns to article after 8 hours. mwwv converseedits 23:54, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Disruptive IP users from the articles WCIU-TV and WGN-TV, who are persistently claiming hoax information about The CW returning to WCIU next year, are vandalizing this page as well by claiming this on the "Television Stations" section. 2603:6081:893D:13AC:1C19:72A9:CDC7:ADB (talk) 00:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 04:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User 'Http Iosue' is continually engaging in edit warring and reverting edits to remove any mention of the sexual assault allegations against former One True King member, Tectone, even after the page went under semi-protected mode. I would like to request assistance to deal with this user and undo the vandalism done to the One True King wikipage. Thank you.Mach9Wikia (talk) 00:28, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This does not appear to be a request for page protection. If this is a dispute over what should be in the article, discuss it on the article talk page; the talk page is unprotected. Note that we must be very careful when adding information about living persons; it is not our job to spread allegations about people's lives. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:26, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. Paramandyr (talk) 01:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 76.36.109.69 (talk · contribs) blocked by Peaceray. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:32, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP with persistent disruption by IPs and vandalism-only accounts. jellyfish  03:23, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longer time or pending changes protection may be merited. Steven Walling • talk 04:04, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page has been highly attacked by IP users as soon as its temporary protection level is removed. They continuously change the box office numbers of the films without adding any sources despite multiple warnings, undermining the credibility of information the page provides. I would like to suggest that the page be permanently semi-protected to minimize the vandalism is possible. If not, temporary protection for a longer period is needed. Sneshik (talk) 03:40, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's only been a day or so since protection expired and there has been only one unsourced edit, which was reverted. If it continues over the coming days, feel free to ping me directly or re-request. Steven Walling • talk 04:02, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. LaffyTaffer (talk) 03:56, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 04:00, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruption by MAB. ~SG5536B 04:50, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]