User talk:Heythereimaguy
Index
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Happy First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Heythereimaguy! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?
The Signpost: 18 November 2024
Regarding your last AIV report
I noticed you left a talk page message notifying a vandal about how you had reported them. Now I'll say up front that this is just how I feel about it, but I don't think it's a good idea.
Firstly, it's not something you're required to do, unlike the administrators' noticeboard. Second, it could serve to agitate an angry vandal and open you up to abuse. And finally, I feel it goes against WP:DENY by giving the vandal extra attention. I also just noticed you're replying to their questions about why they were blocked. Again, I feel DENY applies here, and I very much think they are intending to waste your time, considering the bad faith of their edits. If they want to appeal, then they should follow the instructions themselves and an administrator will look at it.
Other than that, I'm glad to see another editor working against vandalism! TheNerdzilla (talk) 19:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Fair, thanks for reaching out about it. I'll stop - I think they've learned their lesson. Heythereimaguy (talk) 20:01, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Talk page messages
I don't appreciate getting template messages that make false accusations against me. If you want to say something to me, write your own words, and don't make false accusations. 31.222.81.248 (talk) 20:51, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't make any false accusations against you - for this edit I do not believe that a sentence having the wrong tense is sufficient reason to delete it entirely as opposed to altering it to the past tense instead, unless you deleted it for another reason. Heythereimaguy (talk) 21:06, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- You may disagree with the reason I left. You may not falsely claim that I did not leave a reason. Don't post on my talk page again. 31.222.81.248 (talk) 21:27, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- I did not claim that you did not leave a reason, I thought that it wasn't sufficient enough. Heythereimaguy (talk) 21:54, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- If you don't even understand the templates you are leaving, you should not be using them. What exactly made you think that leaving a dishonest template was a better thing to do than writing a message in your own words? 31.222.81.248 (talk) 22:27, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- The template in question says "without adequately explaining why," not that you didn't have an explanation at all. Heythereimaguy (talk) 23:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- You don't understand the implications of the template you are leaving. But ironically enough you don't feel that you need to give any reason at all for trashing my edits. Templating and warning seems to be basically all you do. It might make you feel important; it does not do very much at all to build an encyclopaedia. 31.222.81.248 (talk) 07:01, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- The template in question says "without adequately explaining why," not that you didn't have an explanation at all. Heythereimaguy (talk) 23:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- If you don't even understand the templates you are leaving, you should not be using them. What exactly made you think that leaving a dishonest template was a better thing to do than writing a message in your own words? 31.222.81.248 (talk) 22:27, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- I did not claim that you did not leave a reason, I thought that it wasn't sufficient enough. Heythereimaguy (talk) 21:54, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- The IP user 31.222.81.248 is a sockpuppet of WP:LTA/BKFIP and hence not acting in good faith. I have reported them to WP:ANI accordingly. — AP 499D25 (talk) 09:25, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- You may disagree with the reason I left. You may not falsely claim that I did not leave a reason. Don't post on my talk page again. 31.222.81.248 (talk) 21:27, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 December 2024
- News and notes: Arbitrator election concludes
- Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel articles 5
- Disinformation report: Sex, power, and money revisited
- Op-ed: On the backrooms by Tamzin
- In the media: Like the BBC, often useful but not impartial
- Traffic report: Something Wicked for almost everybody