User talk:Jehochman

Welcome to Jehochman's Talk Page Please feel free to put your feet on the coffee table, and speak candidly. Or for more better relaxation, stretch yourself luxuriously on the chaise longue in Bishzilla's Victorian parlour and mumble incoherently.

There's been a lot of communication over the ages. To find a previous conversation, please search the archives.

Hi Jehochman. Please note that I removed the last sentence of your post at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs#Questions to Cla68 from Jehochman, because thanking 'in advance' for "prompt and concise answers" is presumptuous, and unlikely to effect the intended result. It is refreshing to see that editors are posting on arbitration pages in a professional way, but I anticipate that an editor who was in a heightened state of annoyance (of whom there are very many in arbitration) would react negatively to a windup comment of that nature. If you want to add an alternative that is suitable, like a simple "Thanks", or rephrase the initial comment so that it is a clear request to answer promptly and concisely, then that would be acceptable. Regards, AGK [•] 12:48, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AGK, my comment was really polite in comparison to what I really think about Cla68. I'd like a little balanced support from the clerks. He's talking trash about me without any evidence. Jehochman ^Talk 12:54, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did not realise that you found his evidence so objectionable. I am still deeply irked at your earlier comment, but I will look at his comments presently, and remove anything that is unreasonable. AGK [•] 13:06, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't. I am sorry to have offended you (I was irked), but I think you should be fully unirked before you do anything more here. Jehochman ^Talk 13:07, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I raised some questions about this today on the User's Talk page. As a matter of courtesy I thought I should let you know. DeCausa (talk) 14:25, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. The block was reviewed three times and upheld, so I am not going to entertain further discussions of it. He only gets so many chances to object to the block. At this point if bunny wants to be unblocked he needs to state what good things he will do, and acknowledge that returning to the prior behaviors that resulted in the block will be grounds for re-blocking. Jehochman ^Talk 17:02, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the evidence. In the future, please be careful about undertaking any actions which might disrupt the dispute resolution process that any editors are engaged in. The process is painful enough already as is. Cla68 (talk) 22:18, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. If my clumsy actions (per Tryptofish) made things harder for you, that was bad. Our purpose is to help people resolve disputes. I hope we can be friends in the future. Jehochman ^Talk 22:20, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have made reference to your term for a new and related image tagging issue being discussed. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 19:24, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does it sound like 'rag-tag-tag-tag'? – SJ + 04:59, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in the developing discussion on m:wikicite. – SJ + 04:59, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jehochman. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship.
Message added 11:06, 26 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Wall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Wall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 00:06, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]