User talk:BenFrantzDale

User_talk:BenFrantzDale/Archive 1

Thanks for uploading File:Amc solo logo.svg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:56, 31 December 2008 (UTC) free fall.com stupid — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.131.59.154 (talk) 19:22, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple integration can be seen as measuring the volume of a solid, the area of a surface, the length of a curve, etc. By extension, fractional integration can be seen as measuring the volume/area/length/whatever of a fractal.

Note, 1st-order integration on a volume will give you a surface of lengths, 2nd-order will give you a curve of areas, and 3rd-order will give you a point of volume. The same holds true for fractional integration.

In a way, integrating over an R-dimensional region is just projecting an N-dimensional function onto an N-R dimensional space. think of shining light through a translucent (3D)object onto a (2D)piece of paper. the darkness at a point on the (2D)surface of the paper is equal to the (1D)thickness("length") of the object at that point. 2D+1D=3D The "region of integration" in this example are the (1D)rays cast through the object. (The rays accumulate opacity.) ^{(Really opacity multiplies (50% opaque* 50% opaque = 25% penetration), but the principle is the same. And besides, you can just take the natural log of the darkness to convert it to a sum.)}

Thus, for example, if you do a fractional integration on coral, of order equal to the fractal dimension of the coral, you might get some (0D)growth parameter such as the rate of calcium deposition.

Now if you integrate to a lower order you might get from that a "surface" of growth rates, or something like that (though it might not be a 2-dimensional "surface"). If you look at a point in a region not on the surface of the coral, you might very well get a growth rate that's "locally undefined" - which is all perfectly logical because there's no coral there.

You also might want to consider blowing up a fractal balloon. It a twist on the oft-cited related rates problem, and the solution is just about as straightforward. The important point is that the intuition is just as applicable, and most of nature's balloons are fractal.

You see, since nature has to follow the laws of mathematics and vice-versa, even very high-level math usually has very simple and intuitive explanations. Which is why visualizing the problems, mathematical operations, etc. can often make math MUCH easier than just using a purely formal/symbol approach. (And more useful.) Perhaps not too surprisingly, this was Benoit Mandlebrot's approach.

If I still haven't answered your question: "At what fractional does the fractional derivative does the non-smoothness make the fractional derivative locally undefined?" - then let me just say that it's the same as non-fractional integration. You're really not doing anything different, spatially speaking. And the formalism only describes what's going on spatially, so if you try to measure the volume of a surface or something like that, you'll have problems. Just so long as you realize what you're actually doing, there should be no surprises. And one more thing: notice that integration has a region of integration, but differentiation doesn't. That's why you have to add that "C"(integration constant) back in when you reverse it (and why the "C"'s on the other side of the equation). Same holds true for fractional integration, only the "C" might be a function of fractional dimension. (In a way, the "C" represents information lost in the projection.) NASA invented an "initialized fractional calculus" to deal with this. You might find it interesting. Kevin Baas^talk 17:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Duplicity (software), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duplicity (software). Thank you. Schuym1 (talk) 20:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied at Talk:Bias_of_an_estimator#Explanation_needed. Michael Hardy (talk) 15:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As the editor who added the bit to the Wikipedia Manual of Style about en dashes being used in compound adjectives for which neither part of the adjective modifies the other, I thought you might be interested in knowing that a couple editors are now disputing that in part over at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#en dashes vs hyphens. (As a side note, WikiBlame rocks.) --Wulf (talk) 06:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I jumped into the fray. :-)

Welcome. :) —Wulf (talk) 04:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I’d let you know that the debate has finally gone to vote, over at Talk:Ural-Altaic languages#Requested move. —Wulf (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you wanted to clean up the samples and consolidate into one language (Java), but as a developer myself, I enjoyed seeing the different examples.

The C# sample comes in handy, and it was interesting to see how simple it is to implement in Ruby.

Is trimming the samples really the best solution? Not everyone has a Java background.

Makotosan (talk) 15:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It may be handy, but I don't see how it helps explain the singleton pattern. Let's discuss this at Talk:Design_pattern_(computer_science)#Extraneous Examples. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 15:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your bold changes , reasons

• There is a proposal (see the talk page to merge 2 other articles into the page) please read that - adding both would go to form a fairly broad article.
• The article had clear (and numerous references) to the commonly accepted meaning of the word "traction" including dictionary and engineering handbook definitions. When I found the article it read " traction is a vector vector field defined over the surface of an object describing the force distribution over the surface" if there is an alternative definition such as this please bring it up on the talk page - don't delete the other obvious meanings - the pressure definition seems to be describing "traction force distribution" or "traction pressure"FengRail (talk) 16:02, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please excuse my swearing in the edit summmary.

As far as I can tell what you describe may be the "traction vector" [1]

I'd suggest an addition something like "In tensor analysis the meaning of traction is further extended to be the force exerted per unit area, with units of pressure, and named the traction vector.

Personally I think there may be a good case for a separate article and disambig - with a page Traction (tensor) or Traction (finite element), or maybe Traction (finite element, engineering) - as the two definitions are quite different in scope of topic. Again please discuss on talk page of traction. Thanks.FengRail (talk) 16:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think probably traction tensor (engineering) is the best title, which would be well worth writing, and useful to link to for me. (as it is important in discussions of wheel/rail stress/force analysis) - which in turns relates to the much more basic topic of "traction (pulling force)".FengRail (talk) 16:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a disambiguation description to Traction, but no article. Please check. Thanks.FengRail (talk) 17:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wrote a section of the construction of the dual frame here. Check it out, and see if it makes sense. --KYN (talk) 21:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:ADP chemical structure.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:GaussianScatterPCA.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

If you're still interested, I answered the question you asked 3.5 years ago…

cdang|write me 15:35, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I read the article and don't understand why/how copulas are useful. I can represent the covariance of a multivariate Gaussian distribution with a covariance matrix; this is very natural. What do I gain by transforming a random variable to a multivariate random uniform and then using a copula? It seems like added complexity? What do I gain by this complexity? —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 14:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use of a Gaussian copula doesn't mean the marginal distributions are Gaussian. But I don't know the details of how these are used in finance. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:15, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kung Fu-From Dark Angel.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 209.139.232.70 (talk) 18:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Alcas Corporation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cutno (talk) 16:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. A long time ago you contributed to Talk:Cow (disambiguation); the topic of that discussion has come up again. --Una Smith (talk) 14:23, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Statistics of non-Euclidean spaces, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:01, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the Manual of style (Mathematics) gives explicit guidance on the notation to be used for matrix transposes:

For a matrix transpose, use

• (html): X^T – not X^T
• (Latex): ${\displaystyle X^{\mathrm {T} }\;}$ – not ${\displaystyle X^{T}\;}$; nor ${\displaystyle X^{\top }\;}$.

please, therefore, stop using X^\top, and revert those texts you've changed to it. Jheald (talk) 22:06, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

${\displaystyle X^{\top }}$ is indeed a monstrous apparition, but don't use ${\displaystyle X^{\mathrm {T} }}$ either. ${\displaystyle X^{T}}$ is perfectly acceptable. ObsessiveMathsFreak (talk) 14:07, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job on the lead of covariance and contravariance of vectors. It is very nice altogether, but I have a couple of fussy little questions (of very little actual consequence) about the edit:

1. First of all, I noticed that you got rid of the "system of rigid rods" in favor of just calling it a basis. As a lecturer, I have found the rigid rods analogy to be quite helpful in communicating to students of different backgrounds. So I am somewhat reluctant to abandon this analogy altogether from the lead, in the interests of making the article as accessible as possible, but I defer to your judgment if you think otherwise. (I admit, the new version reads much more cleanly.)

2. The idea flow of the first two sentence of the "vectors" bullet point seems a little backwards to me. Would it be possible to say that the components of the vector vary oppositely, followed by saying that they contra-vary? This would seem to make the point clearer.

--Sławomir Biały (talk) 22:05, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re (1): I seriously doubt someone will be able to understand covariance and contravariance effectively without being comfortable with the word "basis". (I could see arguments against this, but one certainly couldn't have a deep 2+-dimensional understanding of the topic without it.) That's why I dropped it. I'm open to discussion, though :-)

Re (2): The intro really needs some diagrams. Feel free to try rewording; I agree that throwing "contra-vary" in before defining it is sub-optimal. I was having trouble describing varying the "other way" clearly and not incorrectly. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 01:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I recently posted the following text on Wikipedia regarding the creation of a new Visual arts/Technology-related project in Wikipedia:

WikiProject Industrial design is a Wikipedian community that aims to better organize information in articles related to Industrial design (also called Product design).

• If I'm cor-rec-to, there are about 900 articles on Industrial design in Wikipedia...
• At least, it's more than for Typography, and there IS a Typography WikiProject...
• And it's more than the Fashion WikiProject with 482 articles...
• There is also an Urban studies and planning project and a Video games portal so...
• Now you can also see a proposal for the Design Portal. (that portal would be for Industrial design AND Graphic design/Interior design)

Please support this initiative,
--  Alain  R 3 4 5 
^{Techno-Wiki-Geek} 23:09, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BenFrantzDale! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Joseph Zito - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Walter Murphy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:12, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BenFrantzDale, you have received this notice because you have placed your name on the list of members of WikiProject Metal. We are currently looking to make the wikiproject more active, and in doing so, we need to have a list of active members on the wikiproject. If you wish to stay an active part of wikiproject metal, please add your username to Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal/Active Users. Conversely, if you wish to leave the wikiproject, please remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal/Members. Thank you.

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Metta Forest Monastery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No demonstration of notability aside from its association with a notable person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Trusilver 02:17, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:USGS map Albers conic tall.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:52, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:RadPatt-Cart.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:53, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Equiv-receiv-antenna.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:53, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Results by County of the 2008 Democratic Presidential Primaries.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:54, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Muslims-en.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:54, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Distribution H. leucocephalus.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:55, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - as author of the Einstein summation convention template, I thought you might be interested in this: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Physics#Einstein_summation_convention. PAR (talk) 14:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

there is a possibility to change the title of Eigenvalue, eigenvector and eigenspace. We will not be able to call it "Eigenanalysis", as you suggested, as our only possibility to get consensus (and to avoid other changes in the future) is to follow the literature, which almost always uses "Eigenvalues and eigenvectors" for similar articles or textbook chapters.

Would you mind to give us your opinion? Do you agree to use "Eigenvalues and eigenvectors", the same title used in the literature? Without your support, the title would probably remain as silly as it was when MarcelB612 wrote it was silly. Please answer in Talk:Eigenvalue, eigenvector and eigenspace. Thank you

Paolo.dL (talk) 22:54, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you are moving content to Wikibooks, please request an import of the relevant page history at b:Wikibooks:Requests for import. This is to comply with the licensing. I was forced to delete the pages as not having attribution. If you can place the sources at the above-linked page I will restore them and merge the histories. Thanks. Adrignola (talk) 15:28, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on pulling the histories based on the ones I can match up with your contributions here and logged-out contributions at Wikibooks. Adrignola (talk) 15:35, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 21:22, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/Mathematical intuition, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/Mathematical intuition and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/Mathematical intuition during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to share with you my displeasure in the pruning of code examples from numerous different articles - specifically from articles in the software design pattern category.

• The best examples were not necessarily selected to be retained
• No attempt to gather consensus for such sweeping changes were made
• Implementation and limitations of design patterns in different languages are no longer demonstrated or discussed
• Numerous contradictions and errors to several articles were introduced due references to specific examples not being thoroughly cleaned up
• Articles were not removed from categories that are no longer applicable to the articles due to removal of examples (e.g. 'Articles with example %s code')
• As a result, the changes were degrading to the quality of several of the articles.

Although I certainly appreciate your intent and agree that just listing examples for the sake of listing examples isn't help... I think your implementation left a lot to be desired. Instead of bringing the hammer down to knock a bunch of content from multiple articles based strictly on mechanical criteria that isn't necessarily accepted communal editorial policy, make specific and well thought out edits that take into account the benefit of your change in the context of that specific article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.73.21 (talk) 03:54, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the changes were draconian; in truth, I was intentionally being harsh. Consensus was developed earlier and a cleanup was done making the design-patterns pages not be a compendium of examples. Unfortunately, these pages are a magnet for everyone's favorite language, which isn't appropriate. While some pages definitely deserve mention across a range of languages, most are designed primarily to solve specific problems in strongly-typed object-oriented garbage-collected languages, so anything beyond Java (which I've actually never used so it's not my bias) is extraneous. I would argue that, while I did leave things dangling, I improved the pages from being a rat's nest of pet languages. My hope is that, having started Wikibook pages for each, that will act as a sink to satisfy people's passion for providing examples in Objective Scala.NET On Rails or whatever. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 14:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IPod photo free.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to tell that I have derived the peak intensity on the talk page of Lambert's cosine law. --Kri (talk) 01:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am having trouble understanding your creation of the redirect Digital number and bolding the term in Analog-to-digital converter‎. Digital number neither has that as a meaning not is it discussed in that article as a topic. Can you explain this? SpinningSpark 23:10, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At least in talk of digital image sensors, "digital number" describes the number that comes out of digitization. For example, a pixel may have 10432 electrons in it out of a possible 25000 electrons, so after A2D conversion you'd get an 8-bit digital number of 106. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 13:57, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The output of an A2D is a digital number, there is no argument about that, but I still struggle to see the sense of redirecting it to A2D. The output of an air pump is air, but we would not redirect air to that article. A reader typing digital number into the search box is rather more likely to be looking for numerical digit or decimal number. I suggest a redirect to one of those articles is more appropriate. SpinningSpark 16:42, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. "Digital number" has a very particular meaning; I doubt you'd inadvertently go searching for it. I already bolded digital number in the intro on analog-to-digital converter, isn't that enough? —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 17:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bolding is certainly the right thing to do for a redirect, but I'm really disputing that it ought to be redirected to A2D at all. I'll open a discussion on the article page to see what others think. SpinningSpark 20:21, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I reworked the lead of Analog-to-digital converter and removed your boldface before seeing this discussion. I was merely trying to make improvements. I would not like to see these improvements reverted. I did look for redirects and didn't see one; still do not see one. You may wish to restore the boldface but probably best to wait until we finish the redirect discussion. --Kvng (talk) 18:56, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Digital number. Since you had some involvement with the Digital number redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). SpinningSpark 20:38, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have been working to revise the article on screw theory and because you made contributions over the years I thought it would be a good idea to let you know. What started as small changes are slowly growing in scale. I hope you find the additions to be useful. Prof McCarthy (talk) 05:46, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I stumbled upon the page Eigenvalue_perturbation that you wrote; it's very useful to me and I'd like to use it in my thesis. On Talk:Eigenvalue_perturbation you wrote that it comes from your old notes from a course. I would like to get more information... Do you remember if the course had some kind of textbook that I can get from my local library? Maybe you can give the name of the professor so I could ask him by email?

Thanks, Alex --132.67.192.131 (talk) 12:47, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alex. The course itself didn't have any text. I put the page up several years after graduating after visiting the professor, Philip Cha of Harvey Mudd College. He gave me the reference that I think I put on that wikipage. If you want more info, we can take this to emial: [Wikipedia username] at gmail dot com. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 13:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I found a couple of sources that discuss the subject of the article, but they're talking about the simple eigenvalue problem, not the generalized one (not Ax = λBx). I'll update the page if I find something relevant. Alex 77.127.65.95 (talk) 03:44, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks). We obey standard English formatting of proper nouns, regardless of the preferences of the trademark owner.--Srleffler (talk) 03:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So should MATLAB be changed to Matlab? —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 10:57, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Steamship Authority boats requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:14, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful about using undo to fix vandalism. If the vandal made more than one edit, not only do you fail to fix all of it, but you make the fact that the article was vandalized less obvious to other editors who have it watchlisted.--Srleffler (talk) 16:48, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Geometry algorithms, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 01:48, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have corrected your little mistake (it should have been x^3/4 +3x^2/4 - 3x/2 - 2 in stead of x^3/3 + 3x^2/4 - 2x/3 - 2) in Cubic function, and isolated a numeric factor 1/4 for readability. Cheers. - DVdm (talk) 15:57, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	National Archives Backstage Pass at the Reagan Library
	You are invited to the first-ever backstage pass tour and Wikipedia editathon hosted by the Reagan Presidential Library, in Simi Valley, on Saturday, November 19th! The Reagan Library, home to a real Air Force One and other treasures from American history, will take Wikipedians on a special tour of the grounds and archives, followed by an editathon; free catered lunch provided. Please sign up! Dominic·t 20:56, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
	If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Meetup/LA/Invite.

Hello Ben. The category above is being nominated for deletion (by another editor) here. After doing some digging, I found that this category was originally created by you under the name Category:Music-related visual artists back in 2006. It's been through a few renames since, which is why I got notified about the discussion and not you. Anyway, if you'd like to comment, there's the link. Happy editing! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

A tag has been placed on File:Interferometric Microscopy.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Rowe Furniture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:07, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BenFrantzDale!

I've added a section on the Talk page of the Visitor pattern article. Since you've added quite a lot of comments on that page I thought you'd be interested in hearing that I'm trying to formulate a Motivation section, right now as a section on the Talk page. I'd be really interested in hearing your feedback since you seem to understand the Visitor pattern judging by your answers. --Objarni (talk) 08:59, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of songs about California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs about California until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:09, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Great American Wikinic at Pan-Pacific Park
	You are invited to the second Great American Wikinic taking place in Pan-Pacific Park, in Los Angeles, on Saturday, June 23, 2012! Last year's was a blast (see the LA Weekly blog post on it) and we hope we can do better this year. We would love to have you there! —howcheng {chat} 18:28, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
	If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Meetup/LA/Invite.

Hi. When you recently edited Prism coupler, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Prism and Reciprocity theorem (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 26 - FemTech Edit-a-Thon & Roundtable - You are invited!

Everyone is invited to the first FemTech Edit-a-Thon & Roundtable at Claremont Graduate University on October 26 from 3-6 pm. The event will open with a roundtable discussion about feminism and anti-racist technology projects, followed by an edit-a-thon focusing on feminists & women in science. Experienced Wikipedians will be on hand to support new editors. We hope you can join us! Sign up here - see you there! 01:06, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello, BenFrantzDale. You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:49, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ben. You have added the derivation of Gauss-Newton method with this edit. I removed it, because the derivation is already present, in a section towards the end of the article. I think it makes more sense to start with the statement of the method, then an example, then only later to go in the full derivation. Otherwise it becomes too much for readers to take. Let me know what you think. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 05:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ben. In the past, you've made comments on the talk page for PTC (and perhaps edits to the page itself). I work at PTC (FULL DISCLOSURE), and have noticed some out-of-date information. I placed some suggested/requested edits on the talk page, but will not make them on my own due to POC and COI rules. I'm letting you know here on your talk page that some edits are suggested there - I thought you might want to see them, since you had (have?) an interest in the page, given your past edits.

Thanks! -Alan (abelniak)

p.s.: PTC recently officially changed its name to PTC (from Parametric Technology Coropration), if you are interested: http://investor.ptc.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=735554

Abelniak (talk) 18:49, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Distance from a point to a line is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distance from a point to a line until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bg9989 (talk) 11:50, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/LA/SDCC1. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 17:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	Great American Wikinic at Pan-Pacific Park
	You are invited to the third Great American Wikinic taking place in Pan-Pacific Park, in Los Angeles, on Saturday, June 22, 2013! We would love to see you there! —howcheng {chat} 00:58, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
	If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Meetup/LA/Invite.

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Phase diag iron carbon-color temp.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The UCR Libraries are hosting three edit-a-thons focusing on their great special collections (science fiction, water resources, the Inland Empire and more) on Oct. 12, 2013, Oct. 26, 2013, and Nov. 23, 2013. Please participate if you can! Details and signup here. All are welcome, new and experienced editors alike! -- phoebe / (talk to me) 04:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did you take File:Jonathan Kozol.jpg? If so, can you add a note that you are the author so I can transfer it to Commons?  czar ♔ 04:12, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moved  czar ♔ 23:12, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cheasesteak.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:59, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LA Meetup: March 9 edit-a-thon at MOCA

Dear fellow Wikipedian, You have been invited to a meetup and edit-a-thon at the Museum of Contemporary Art in downtown Los Angeles on Sunday, March 9, 2014 from 11 am to 6 pm! This event is in collaboration with MOCA and the arts collective East of Borneo and aims to improve coverage of LA art since the 1980s. (Even if contemporary art isn't your thing, you're welcome to join too!) Please RSVP here if you're interested. I hope to see you there! User:Calliopejen1 (talk) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

LA Meetup: May 10 Asian Pacific American edit-a-thon

Dear fellow Wikipedian, You have been invited to a meetup and edit-a-thon at the Junipero Serra Branch of the LA Public Library (4607 S. Main St., 90037) on Saturday, May 10, 2014 from 10 am to 4 pm! This event is sponsored by the Smithsonian Asian Pacific American Center and the Asian Pacific American Librarians Association and aims to improve coverage of Asian Pacific American topics, particularly as they relate to southern California. Please RSVP here if you're interested. I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:11, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply] To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Your upload of File:Cm-alpha-curve-Cessna-182.svg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:48, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LA meetups: Adrianne Wadewitz memorial edit-a-thons on May 23 and May 31

Dear fellow Wikipedian, There are two LA edit-a-thons in memory of Adrianne Wadewitz, a prolific Wikipedia editor, in the coming weeks. Please join us May 23 at Occidental College and May 31 at the Institute of Cultural Inquiry to combat systemic bias and help further Adrianne's legacy. No experience needed! Please RSVP at the relevant page(s) if you plan to attend. I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:28, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply] To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

I have posted a comment in your article/discussion on 'moment'. Please consider my request to elaborate the historical perspective on the issue. Bkpsusmitaa (talk) 16:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Amc solo logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:01, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That was an SVG of the Appalachian Mountain Club's old logo. There's a new one. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 13:16, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Amc solo logo.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:14, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Faultless Starch/Bon Ami Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.faultless.com/history.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Mdann52talk to me! 09:02, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BenFrantzDale! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thanks for the nice work on the illustration of NURBS circles in 3D. I immediately recognized it as matplotlib output. I was looking at the code in an attempt to learn about NURBS; when testing it I discovered a few problems. Is this the code you used to generate the image? The code seems to contain some cruft. For example, the variables arcNURBS and Pw are each set once without being used, and there are a few lines of commented code which purpose isn't clear and which may cause confusion. When the plot is generated, the cone is incorrectly scaled, it completely dwarfs the circle. If you have the real code used to generate the image, it would help others to post it. I am sifting through it myself, but you're likely better qualified to identify faults. Thanks again for your contribution! --Rhombus (talk) 00:56, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is the code I used. I left in other cruft that I'd made along the way. I forget what it was for. Re-running it, I see the scaling too, and I'm not sure why. The points in xs, ys, and ws appear to be correct (xs and ys are in the range [-1, 1]; ws is just [0, 1, 1, 1,...,1]). I don't know what's wrong. Feel free to edit the code I put on the image page, though. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 14:45, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just fixed the code. Now it is working and the image corresponds to the code presented. --Nicoguaro (talk) 00:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit to the Transimpedance Amplifier page. "1% linearity" is a short form of linearity to +/- 1%. This terminology is more widely used in electronics. Zen-in (talk) 17:50, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BenFrantzDale. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

Hello, BenFrantzDale. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article 80/20 (framing system) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Weird, thinly-veiled promo for an otherwise non-notable framing system. (80/20 is a brand name, though this isn't mentioned in the article.)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — foxj 04:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 80/20 (framing system) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/80/20 (framing system) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — foxj 16:06, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of solution strategies for differential equations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NMANUAL.Unreliably sourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winged Blades ^Godric 09:35, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nexcare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:45, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Apple phone. Since you had some involvement with the Apple phone redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:33, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BenFrantzDale. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nexcare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:07, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to an article about.... food packaging Edaham (talk) 01:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nexcare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nexcare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:39, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Massachusetts question 3. Since you had some involvement with the Massachusetts question 3 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 20:48, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BenFrantzDale. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect L2 norm. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 11#L2 norm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect L2 norm. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 24#L2 norm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:50, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bon Ami is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bon Ami until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Waggie (talk) 20:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Map-based controller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Map-based controller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Coin945 (talk) 08:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of songs about California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs about California (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--Bongwarrior (talk) 03:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poedit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poedit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 08:20, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Enui and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 6#Enui until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. eviolite (talk) 00:25, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect L2 norm and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 4#L2 norm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. fgnievinski (talk) 22:04, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Polar vector and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 3#Polar vector until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ChromaNebula (talk) 04:23, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Le Creuset is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Creuset until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 14:49, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MP3 Newswire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MP3 Newswire (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samsung SPH-A460 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsung SPH-A460 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 15:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]