Timeline for Under what circumstances will Stack Exchange, Inc. share private/sensitive information with the press?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2023 at 18:13 | comment | added | Shog9 | Worth noting, @Esther, that Teresa left the company shortly before the current ... Let's be nice and say "bad faith interpretation" ... Of this policy came into play. I believe she had every reason to believe it would be upheld in the spirit in which it was written, that of mending fences vs burning bridges. | |
| Jun 13, 2023 at 14:56 | comment | added | Esther | wow, this post certainly aged like milk. | |
| Aug 6, 2020 at 5:14 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | Ms. Dietrich, your user page here links to teresadietrich(dot)com, which in turn tells us that you can be reached at teresadg(at)gmail(dot)com. Do you ever reply to such emails? It's been two months since I wrote to you there. I have been an almost daily poster here for about a decade, with a reputation of over 238,000. | |
| Jul 8, 2020 at 19:07 | history | edited | Yaakov EllisStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
add reference to language in mod agreement v2
|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 23:24 | vote | accept | Isaac Moses | ||
| Jun 16, 2020 at 21:10 | comment | added | Bryan Krause | @RobertColumbia I'd be pretty uncomfortable with SE answering that question, because it would be doing to an employee exactly what has been done to a moderator that caused all this consternation in the first place. I don't think the community should be in the position of calling for heads or reckonings for individuals employed by the company. | |
| Jun 16, 2020 at 20:53 | comment | added | Robert Columbia | You mention, "though we had internal polices...". Was the initial action in speaking to the press a violation of company policy, or was it permitted at the time but banned after the incident? | |
| Jun 16, 2020 at 19:22 | comment | added | Shog9 | This is good to see. I relayed the short message above from those responsible 8 months ago - it was necessary at the time, but really, "we won't shoot off the other foot" was pretty weak sauce. This is much better - unprompted and well thought out, it more strongly suggests such a policy might actually be heeded in the future. 👍 | |
| Jun 16, 2020 at 18:47 | comment | added | Sébastien Renauld | Hey Teresa! Yaakov sent me this answer - that's a huge step forward! Thank you for dealing with the elephant in the room. There's still two minor concerns on my mind (both of which I'll probably put into words at some point), but as stated, they're minor concerns. If there's a clear "we won't feed people to the wolves" policy, that has me set. | |
| S Jun 16, 2020 at 18:42 | history | notice added | user50049 | Policy Lock | |
| S Jun 16, 2020 at 18:42 | history | locked | user50049 | ||
| Jun 16, 2020 at 18:41 | history | answered | Teresa DietrichStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |