Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 7
    Despite the "CC BY-SA" technicalities, which are definitely worth better visibility to the community as the current bounty suggests, this question raises an even more important topic: The company has said, "attribution is non-negotiable." I'm actually not against a partnership with OpenAI but I think it is important for the company to stay true to this promise to continue maintaining some level of trust with us, the community. Commented May 9, 2024 at 18:03
  • 10
    One way to predict future behavior is to look at the past actions of OpenAI. At this point, the foundational principles have been gutted. Once money enters the equation, any talk of "socially responsible" guidelines falls aside. This, along with the obvious points that have been better expressed already by community members here, are the reasons why this is an ill-advised path forward.
    – ILMostro_7
    Commented May 10, 2024 at 4:51
  • "Attribution is non-negotiable" could be read as "we were not able to negotiate attribution into the contract" ;-) Commented May 23, 2024 at 23:11
  • "why this partnership?" - money, of course. SE is a profit-driven company, and that's not going to change regardless of how it impacts the community
    – Anonymous
    Commented May 24, 2024 at 14:39