Return to Answer

My answers have been read by over 151,000 people on the physics Stack Exchange site (PSE). That makes me the top 3% of users. I wrote those answers to help the community. I am not okay with my answers being used for the benefit and profit of OpenAI, a company I do not like.

I was banned yesterday from PSE for deleting my answers, which were edited back to my former writing.

For some context, I am of the belief that the goal to advance AI to an intelligence greater than humans doesn't lead us to a brighter future. We can agree that that is OpenAI's stated goal, even if we disagree how realistic it is or what the timeline might be. So, I don't want to contribute to their effort at all. That is the practical purpose behind editing away my answers. I believe this partnership may be a result of the added profit motive after purchase of SE by investment firm Prosus.

My answers have been read by over 151,000 people on the physics Stack Exchange site (PSE). That makes me the top 3% of users. I wrote those answers to help the community. I am not okay with my answers being used for the profit of OpenAI.

I was banned yesterday from PSE for deleting my answers, which were edited back to my former writing.

For some context, I am of the belief that the goal to advance AI to an intelligence greater than humans doesn't lead us to a brighter future. We can agree that that is OpenAI's stated goal, even if we disagree how realistic it is or what the timeline might be. So, I don't want to contribute to their effort at all. That is the practical purpose behind editing away my answers. I believe this partnership may be a result of the added profit motive after purchase of SE by investment firm Prosus.

My answers have been read by over 151,000 people on the physics Stack Exchange site (PSE). That makes me the top 3% of users. I wrote those answers to help the community. I am not okay with my answers being used for the benefit and profit of OpenAI, a company I do not like.

I was banned yesterday from PSE for deleting my answers, which were edited back to my former writing.

For some context, I am of the belief that the goal to advance AI to an intelligence greater than humans doesn't lead us to a brighter future. We can agree that that is OpenAI's stated goal, even if we disagree how realistic it is or what the timeline might be. So, I don't want to contribute to their effort at all. That is the practical purpose behind editing away my answers. I believe this partnership may be a result of the added profit motive after purchase of SE by investment firm Prosus.

Edit: Removed the sentiment "This is sad". I don't want to make a drama, just documenting my experience.

My answers have been read by over 151,000 people on the physics Stack Exchange site (PSE). That makes me the top 3% of users. I wrote those answers to help the community. I am not okay with my answers being used for the benefit and profit of OpenAI, a company I do not like.

I was banned yesterday from PSE for deleting my answers, which were edited back to my former writing.

For some context, I am of the belief that the goal to advance AI to an intelligence greater than humans doesn't lead us to a brighter future. We can agree that that is OpenAI's stated goal, even if we disagree how realistic it is or what the timeline might be. So, I don't want to contribute to their effort at all. That is the practical purpose behind editing away my answers. I believe this partnership may be a result of the added profit motive after purchase of SE by investment firm Prosus.

My answers have been read by over 151,000 people on the physics Stack Exchange site (PSE). That makes me the top 3% of users. I wrote those answers to help the community. I am not okay with my answers being used for the benefit and profit of OpenAI, a company I do not like.

I was banned yesterday from PSE for deleting my answers, which were edited back to my former writing.

For some context, I am of the belief that the goal to advance AI to an intelligence greater than humans doesn't lead us to a brighter future. We can agree that that is OpenAI's stated goal, even if we disagree how realistic it is or what the timeline might be. So, I don't want to contribute to their effort at all. That is the practical purpose behind editing away my answers. I believe this partnership may be a result of the added profit motive after purchase of SE by investment firm Prosus.

My answers have been read by over 151,000 people on the physics Stack Exchange site (PSE). That makes me the top 3% of users. I wrote those answers to help the community. I am not okay with my answers being used for the benefit and profit of OpenAI, a company I do not like.

I was banned yesterday from PSE for deleting my answers, which were edited back to my former writing.

For some context, I am of the belief that the goal to advance AI to an intelligence greater than humans doesn't lead us to a brighter future. We can agree that that is OpenAI's stated goal, even if we disagree how realistic it is or what the timeline might be. So, I don't want to contribute to their effort at all. That is the practical purpose behind editing away my answers. I believe this partnership may be a result of the added profit motive after purchase of SE by investment firm Prosus.

Edit: Removed the sentiment "This is sad". I don't want to make a drama, just documenting my experience.