A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy
- PMID: 28191498
- PMCID: PMC5292877
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-117219
A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Abstract
Background and study aims Medical error occurs frequently with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aime to assess the frequency and type of endoscopy patient safety incidents (PSIs). Patients and methods A prospective observational study of PSIs in routine diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy was undertaken in a secondary and tertiary care center. Observations were undertaken within the endoscopy suite across pre-procedure, intra-procedure and post-procedure phases of care. Experienced (Consultant-level) and trainee endoscopists from medical, surgical, and nursing specialities were included. PSIs were defined as any safety issue that had the potential to or directly adversely affected patient care: PSIs included near misses, complications, adverse events and "never events". PSIs were reviewed by an expert panel and categorized for severity and nature via expert consensus. Results One hundred and forty procedures (92 diagnostic, 48 therapeutic) over 37 lists (experienced operators n = 25, trainees n = 12) were analyzed. One hundred forty PSIs were identified (median 1 per procedure, range 0 - 7). Eighty-six PSIs (61 %) occurred in 48 therapeutic procedures. Zero PSIs were detected in 13 diagnostic procedures. 21 (15 %) PSIs were categorized as severe and 12 (9 %) had the potential to be "never events," including patient misidentification and wrong procedure. Forty PSIs (28 %) were of intermediate severity and 78 (56 %) were minor. Oxygen monitoring PSIs occurred most frequently. Conclusion This is the first study documenting the range and frequency of PSIs in endoscopy. Although many errors are minor without immediate consequence, further work should identify whether prevention of such recurrent errors affects the incidence of severe errors, thus improving safety and quality.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Characterising the nature of clinical incidents reported across a tertiary health service: a retrospective audit.Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):447-454. doi: 10.1071/AH20271. Aust Health Rev. 2021. PMID: 33684339
-
Effectiveness and limitations of an incident-reporting system analyzed by local clinical safety leaders in a tertiary hospital: Prospective evaluation through real-time observations of patient safety incidents.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(38):e12509. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012509. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 30235764 Free PMC article.
-
Trend Analysis of Patient Safety Incidents and Their Associated Factors in Korea Using National Patient Safety Report Data (2017~2019).Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 11;18(16):8482. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168482. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34444229 Free PMC article.
-
Measures of Patient Safety Based on Hospital Administrative Data - The Patient Safety Indicators.Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2002 Aug. Report No.: 02-0038. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2002 Aug. Report No.: 02-0038. PMID: 20734521 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
A critical review of patient safety indicators attributed to trauma surgeons.Injury. 2017 Sep;48(9):1994-1998. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.051. Epub 2017 Apr 1. Injury. 2017. PMID: 28416153 Review.
Cited by
-
Simulation-based mastery learning in gastrointestinal endoscopy training.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Sep 16;14(9):512-523. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i9.512. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022. PMID: 36186944 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre.BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Aug 21;7(3):e000294. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000294. eCollection 2018. BMJ Open Qual. 2018. PMID: 30167474 Free PMC article.
-
Improving safety and reducing error in endoscopy (ISREE): a survey of UK services.Frontline Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug 19;12(7):593-600. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2020-101561. eCollection 2021. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 34917317 Free PMC article.
-
Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review.Endosc Int Open. 2023 Feb 23;11(2):E193-E201. doi: 10.1055/a-1981-3047. eCollection 2023 Feb. Endosc Int Open. 2023. PMID: 36845269 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Identifying a list of healthcare 'never events' to effect system change: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jun;12(2):e002264. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002264. BMJ Open Qual. 2023. PMID: 37364940 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Leape L. The nature of adverse events in hospitalised patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:377–384. - PubMed
-
- Thomas E, Studdert D, Burstin H et al.Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care. 2000;38:261–271. - PubMed
-
- Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Healthcare System. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources