Prediction of Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates by Different Growth Standards
- PMID: 32860453
- DOI: 10.1002/jum.15470
Prediction of Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates by Different Growth Standards
Abstract
Objective: Compare the accuracy of the Hadlock, the NICHD, and the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) charts to detect large-for-gestational-age (LGA) and adverse neonatal outcomes (as a secondary outcome).
Methods: This is a secondary analysis from a prospective study that included singleton non-anomalous gestations with growth ultrasound at 26-36 weeks. LGA was suspected with estimated fetal weight > 90th percentile by the NICHD, FMF, and Hadlock charts. LGA was diagnosed with birth weight > 90th percentile. We tested the performance of these charts to detect LGA and adverse neonatal outcomes (neonatal intensive care unit admission, Ph < 7.1, Apgar <7 at 5 minutes, seizures, and neonatal death) by calculating the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.
Results: Of 1054 pregnancies, 123 neonates (12%) developed LGA. LGA was suspected in 58 (5.5%) by Hadlock, 229 (21.7%) by NICHD standard, and 231 (22%) by FMF chart. The NICHD standard (AUC: .79; 95% CI: .75-.83 vs. AUC .64; 95%CI: .6-.68; p = < .001) and FMF chart (AUC: .81 95% CI: .77-.85 vs. AUC .64; 95%CI: .6-.68; p = < .001) were more accurate than Hadlock. The FMF and NICHD had higher sensitivity (77.2 vs. 72.4 vs. 30.1%) but Hadlock had higher specificity for LGA (97.5 vs. 88.5 vs. 85.4%). All standards were poor predictors for adverse neonatal outcomes.
Conclusions: The NICHD and the FMF standards may increase the detection rate of LGA in comparison to the Hadlock chart. However, this may increase obstetrical interventions.
Keywords: Adverse neonatal outcomes; birth weight; estimated fetal weight; hypoglycemia macrosomia.
© 2020 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Prediction of large-for-gestational-age infant by fetal growth charts and hemoglobin A1c level in pregnancy complicated by pregestational diabetes.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec;60(6):751-758. doi: 10.1002/uog.26071. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 36099480 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;55(2):177-188. doi: 10.1002/uog.20299. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31006913 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of different fetal growth charts in prediction of large-for-gestational age and associated neonatal morbidity in multiethnic obese population.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul;56(1):73-77. doi: 10.1002/uog.20413. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31364195
-
Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;58(2):264-277. doi: 10.1002/uog.22151. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 32672406
-
Customized vs population-based growth charts to identify neonates at risk of adverse outcome: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of observational studies.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;50(2):156-166. doi: 10.1002/uog.17381. Epub 2017 Jul 6. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 27935148 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Sep;231(3):338.e1-338.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.12.034. Epub 2023 Dec 25. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38151220
-
Development of a Machine Learning Model for Sonographic Assessment of Gestational Age.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2248685. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48685. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 36598790 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of large-for-gestational-age infant by fetal growth charts and hemoglobin A1c level in pregnancy complicated by pregestational diabetes.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec;60(6):751-758. doi: 10.1002/uog.26071. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 36099480 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice B-O. Practice Bulletin No. 173: Fetal Macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128:e195-e209.
-
- Esakoff TF, Cheng YW, Sparks TN, Caughey AB. The association between birthweight 4000 g or greater and perinatal outcomes in patients with and without gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:672 e671-672 e674.
-
- Perlow JH, Wigton T, Hart J, Strassner HT, Nageotte MP, Wolk BM. Birth trauma. A five-year review of incidence and associated perinatal factors. J Reprod Med 1996; 41:754-760.
-
- Sparano S, Ahrens W, De Henauw S, et al. Being macrosomic at birth is an independent predictor of overweight in children: results from the IDEFICS study. Matern Child Health J 2013; 17:1373-1381.
-
- Carter EB, Stockburger J, Tuuli MG, Macones GA, Odibo AO, Trudell AS. Large-for-gestational age and stillbirth: is there a role for antenatal testing? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 54:334-337.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources