Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation in patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery: the multicentre prospective randomised IMPROVE-2 study protocol
- PMID: 35523498
- PMCID: PMC9083403
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054823
Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation in patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery: the multicentre prospective randomised IMPROVE-2 study protocol
Erratum in
-
Correction: Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation in patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery: the multicentre prospective randomised IMPROVE-2 study protocol.BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 7;14(11):e054823corr1. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054823corr1. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39515871 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
IntroductionEmergency abdominal surgery is associated with a high risk of postoperative complications. One of the most serious is postoperative respiratory failure (PRF), with reported rates up to 20%-30% and attributable 30-day mortality that can exceed 20%.Lung-protective ventilation, especially the use of low tidal volume, may help reducing the risk of lung injury. The role of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment manoeuvre (RM) remains however debated. We aim to evaluate whether a strategy aimed at increasing alveolar recruitment by using higher PEEP levels and RM could be more effective at reducing PRF and mortality after emergency abdominal surgery than a strategy aimed at minimising alveolar distension by using lower PEEP levels without RM.
Methods and analysis: The IMPROVE-2 study is a multicentre randomised, parallel-group clinical trial of 680 patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either low PEEP levels (≤5 cm H2O) without RM or high PEEP levels individually adjusted according to driving pressure in addition to RM, stratified by centre and according to the presence of shock and hypoxaemia at randomisation. The primary endpoint is a composite of PRF and all-cause mortality by day 30 or hospital discharge. Data will be analysed on the intention-to-treat principle and a per-protocol basis.
Ethics and dissemination: IMPROVE-2 trial has been approved by an independent ethics committee for all study centres. Participant recruitment began in February 2021. Results will be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed journals.
Trial registration number: NCT03987789.
Keywords: Adult intensive & critical care; Adult surgery; SURGERY.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery (PROVHILO trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2014 Aug 9;384(9942):495-503. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60416-5. Epub 2014 Jun 2. Lancet. 2014. PMID: 24894577 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of Different Ventilation Strategies on Driving Pressure, Mechanical Power, and Biological Markers During Open Abdominal Surgery in Rats.Anesth Analg. 2017 Oct;125(4):1364-1374. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002348. Anesth Analg. 2017. PMID: 28759484
-
Ventilation with high versus low peep levels during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery does not affect postoperative spirometry: A randomised clinical trial.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Aug;34(8):534-543. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000626. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017. PMID: 28306591 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of individualized positive end-expiratory pressure combined with recruitment maneuver on intraoperative ventilation during abdominal surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Anesth. 2022 Apr;36(2):303-315. doi: 10.1007/s00540-021-03012-9. Epub 2021 Nov 10. J Anesth. 2022. PMID: 34757497 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Apr;4(4):272-80. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)00057-6. Epub 2016 Mar 4. Lancet Respir Med. 2016. PMID: 26947624 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical