Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 2;24(1):638.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06836-x.

Explaining maternal antenatal attachment by psychological, clinical and sociodemographic factors: a path analysis study

Ana Paula Forte Camarneiro  1 , Magda Sofia Roberto  2 , João Manuel Rosado de Miranda Justo  2
Affiliations

Explaining maternal antenatal attachment by psychological, clinical and sociodemographic factors: a path analysis study

Ana Paula Forte Camarneiro et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Antenatal attachment is a fundamental concept relative to human transition to parenthood and may be influenced by several factors. The aim of this study is to find the best model to explain maternal antenatal attachment based on the interaction among sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological variables.

Methods: Pregnant women (N = 407) were interviewed during the second trimester of pregnancy while waiting for medical consultations. A sociodemographic, obstetric, and psychometric protocol was used.

Statistical analyses: path analysis.

Independent variables: psychopathological symptomatology, depression, anxiety, stress, occupational stress, attitudes about pregnancy and motherhood, coping styles, marital satisfaction, sociodemographic, and clinical variables.

Dependent variables: maternal antenatal attachment in its several dimensions; quality of attachment (QA), intensity of preoccupation (IP), and global attachment (GA).

Results: Depression, anxiety, attitudes, and marital satisfaction explained 37% of maternal antenatal QA. Age, depression, anxiety, attitudes, and marital satisfaction explained 26% of maternal antenatal IP. Age, depression, anxiety, attitudes, and marital satisfaction explained 34% of the statistical variance of maternal antenatal GA.

Conclusions: Factors like emotional states (depression and anxiety), attitudes towards pregnancy and motherhood, marital satisfaction, and a sociodemographic variable (age) contribute significantly for the explanation of maternal antenatal attachment.

Keywords: Antenatal attachment; Mother; Path analysis; Pregnancy; Structural equation modelling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Visual depiction of the Path Analyses Models (Model 1 and Model 2) Summarizing the Relationships between the Study Variables. Note: Each explanatory variable is represented generically in the visual representation to facilitate comprehensiveness. The analyses were performed with the manifest subscales included in each dimension. Models were tested separately
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Bowlby J. The nature of the child’s tie to his mother. Int J Psychoanal. 1958;39:350–73. http://www.psychology.sunysb.edu/attachment/online/nature%20of%20the%20c.... - PubMed
    1. Condon JT. The assessment of antenatal emotional attachment: development of a questionnaire instrument. Brit J Med Psychol. 1993;66:167–83. 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1993.tb01739.x. Doi.org/. - PubMed
    1. Cranley MS. Development of a tool for the measurement of maternal attachment during pregnancy. Nurs Res. 1981;30(5):281–84. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6912989. - PubMed
    1. Muller ME. Development of the antenatal attachment inventory. West J Nurs Res. 1993;15(2):199–215. 10.1177/019394599301500205. - PubMed
    1. Branjerdporn G, Meredith P, Strong J, Garcia J. Associations between maternal-foetal attachment and infant developmental outcomes: a systematic review. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(3):540–53. 10.1007/s10995-016-2138-2. - PubMed