Talk:Ted L. Nancy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:14, 7 September 2012

Mtamony edits

Mtamony has been reverting edits and saying the he is waiting on legal advice. Consensus guides Wikipedia. Please justify your edits with Wikipedia policy, not legal threats. Thanks. -- Wikipedical (talk) 19:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody threatened you. I simply asked if you needed an explanation from Ted L Nancy legal representation as to why the page should not be randomly redirected or edited. Your current edits are factually incorrect. The legal trademark holder for Ted L Nancy has asked for the changes to be made. Does this not fall under Wikipedia policy? Mtamony —Preceding undated comment added 20:06, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you so urgently need this page changed that you can't wait for us to draft newer content?--Mtamony (talk) 20:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will continue to correctly edit this wikipedia page under the direction of Ted L. Nancy legal representation. I will attempt to provide valid citations and links where needed.--Mtamony (talk) 22:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss the problematic issues in detail here and provide reliable, third party sources - the community of experienced Wikipedia editors will decide what is relevant or correct content according to Wikipedia policies, and not someone's legal representative. Edit warring will simply result in the page being blocked and eventually the users too. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:34, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am editing the page with facts provided by the representatives of the Ted L Nancy trademark. There shouldn't be any problematic issues with that. I am also attempting to contruct the page so it fits better with Wikipedia's design.--Mtamony (talk) 22:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:No original research, one of the core policies for Wikipedia. From that page: "All material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source," not information given to you by a legal representative. Do any of these examples apply to you, Mtamony? -- Wikipedical (talk) 22:51, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to provide reliable, published sources for what I am posting. I have a job, a child, a wife, etc. I will try to add these citations as soon as possible. I would also ask, do any of these examples apply to you, Wikipedical? I have not been paid a penny to do any of this.

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 :I am editing the page with facts provided by the representatives of the Ted L Nancy trademark. There shouldn't be any problematic issues with that. I am also attempting to contruct the page so it fits better with Wikipedia's design.--[[User:Mtamony|Mtamony]] ([[User talk:Mtamony|talk]]) 22:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 ::Please read [[Wikipedia:No original research]], one of the core policies for Wikipedia.  From that page: "All material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source," not information given to you by a legal representative.  Do any of [[Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#Examples|these examples]] apply to you, Mtamony?  --  [[User:Wikipedical|Wikipedical]] ([[User talk:Wikipedical|talk]]) 22:51, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
+:I am trying to provide reliable, published sources for what I am posting. I have a job, a child, a wife, etc. I will try to add these citations as soon as possible. I would also ask, do any of [[Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#Examples|these examples]] apply to you, Wikipedical? I have not been paid a penny to do any of this.