Wien's displacement law: Difference between revisions

Not to be confused with Wien distribution law.

Wien's displacement law states that the black-body radiation curve for different temperatures will peak at different wavelengths that are inversely proportional to the temperature. The shift of that peak is a direct consequence of the Planck radiation law, which describes the spectral brightness of black-body radiation as a function of wavelength at any given temperature. However, it had been discovered by Wilhelm Wien several years before Max Planck developed that more general equation, and describes the entire shift of the spectrum of black-body radiation toward shorter wavelengths as temperature increases.

Formally, Wien's displacement law states that the spectral radiance of black-body radiation per unit wavelength, peaks at the wavelength λ_peak given by:

${\displaystyle \lambda _{\text{peak}}={\frac {b}{T}}}$

where T is the absolute temperature in kelvins. b is a constant of proportionality called Wien's displacement constant, equal to 2.897771955...×10⁻³ m⋅K,^[1] or to obtain wavelength in micrometers, b ≈ 2898 μm⋅K. If one is considering the peak of black body emission per unit frequency or per proportional bandwidth, one must use a different proportionality constant. However, the form of the law remains the same: the peak wavelength is inversely proportional to temperature, and the peak frequency is directly proportional to temperature.

Wien's displacement law may be referred to as "Wien's law", a term which is also used for the Wien approximation.

Wien's displacement law is relevant to some everyday experiences:

• A piece of metal heated by a blow torch first becomes "red hot" as the very longest visible wavelengths appear red, then becomes more orange-red as the temperature is increased, and at very high temperatures would be described as "white hot" as shorter and shorter wavelengths come to predominate the black body emission spectrum. Before it had even reached the red hot temperature, the thermal emission was mainly at longer infrared wavelengths, which are not visible; nevertheless, that radiation could be felt as it warms one's nearby skin.
• One easily observes changes in the color of an incandescent light bulb (which produces light through thermal radiation) as the temperature of its filament is varied by a light dimmer. As the light is dimmed and the filament temperature decreases, the distribution of color shifts toward longer wavelengths and the light appears redder, as well as dimmer.
• A wood fire at 1500 K puts out peak radiation at about 2000 nm. 98% of its radiation is at wavelengths longer than 1000 nm, and only a tiny proportion at visible wavelengths (390–700 nm). Consequently, a campfire can keep one warm but is a poor source of visible light.
• The effective temperature of the Sun is 5778 K. Using Wien's law, one finds a peak emission per nanometer (of wavelength) at a wavelength of about 500 nm, in the green portion of the spectrum near the peak sensitivity of the human eye.^[2][3] On the other hand, in terms of power per unit optical frequency, the Sun's peak emission is at 343 THz or a wavelength of 883 nm in the near infrared. In terms of power per percentage bandwidth, the peak is at about 635 nm, a red wavelength. Regardless of how one wants to plot the spectrum, about half of the sun's radiation is at wavelengths shorter than 710 nm, about the limit of the human vision. Of that, about 12% is at wavelengths shorter than 400 nm, ultraviolet wavelengths, which is invisible to an unaided human eye. It can be appreciated that a rather large amount of the Sun's radiation falls in the fairly small visible spectrum.

• The preponderance of emission in the visible range, however, is not the case in most stars. The hot supergiant Rigel emits 60% of its light in the ultraviolet, while the cool supergiant Betelgeuse emits 85% of its light at infrared wavelengths. With both stars prominent in the constellation of Orion, one can easily appreciate the color difference between the blue-white Rigel (T = 12100 K) and the red Betelgeuse (T ≈ 3300 K). While few stars are as hot as Rigel, stars cooler than the sun or even as cool as Betelgeuse are very commonplace.
• Mammals with a skin temperature of about 300 K emit peak radiation at around 10 μm in the far infrared. This is therefore the range of infrared wavelengths that pit viper snakes and passive IR cameras must sense.
• When comparing the apparent color of lighting sources (including fluorescent lights, LED lighting, computer monitors, and photoflash), it is customary to cite the color temperature. Although the spectra of such lights are not accurately described by the black-body radiation curve, a color temperature is quoted for which black-body radiation would most closely match the subjective color of that source. For instance, the blue-white fluorescent light sometimes used in an office may have a color temperature of 6500 K, whereas the reddish tint of a dimmed incandescent light may have a color temperature (and an actual filament temperature) of 2000 K. Note that the informal description of the former (bluish) color as "cool" and the latter (reddish) as "warm" is exactly opposite the actual temperature change involved in black-body radiation.

The law is named for Wilhelm Wien, who derived it in 1893 based on a thermodynamic argument.^[4] Wien considered adiabatic expansion of a cavity containing waves of light in thermal equilibrium. He showed that, under slow expansion or contraction, the energy of light reflecting off the walls changes in exactly the same way as the frequency. A general principle of thermodynamics is that a thermal equilibrium state, when expanded very slowly, stays in thermal equilibrium. The adiabatic principle allowed Wien to conclude that for each mode, the adiabatic invariant energy/frequency is only a function of the other adiabatic invariant, the frequency/temperature. A modern variant of Wien's derivation can be found in the textbook by Wannier.^[5]

The consequence is that the shape of the black-body radiation function (which was not yet understood) would shift proportionally in frequency (or inversely proportionally in wavelength) with temperature. When Max Planck later formulated the correct black-body radiation function it did not explicitly include Wien's constant b. Rather, Planck's constant h was created and introduced into his new formula. From Planck's constant h and the Boltzmann constant k, Wien's constant b can be obtained.

For spectral flux considered per unit frequency ${\displaystyle d\nu }$ (in hertz), Wien's displacement law describes a peak emission at the optical frequency ${\displaystyle \nu _{\text{peak}}}$ given by:

${\displaystyle \nu _{\text{peak}}={\alpha \over h}kT\approx (5.879\times 10^{10}\ \mathrm {Hz/K} )\cdot T}$

or equivalently

${\displaystyle h\nu _{\text{peak}}=\alpha kT\approx (2.431\times 10^{-4}\ \mathrm {eV/K} )\cdot T}$

where α ≈ 2.8214391... is a constant resulting from the numerical solution of the maximization equation, k is the Boltzmann constant, h is the Planck constant, and T is the temperature (in kelvins). With the emission now considered per unit frequency, this peak now corresponds to a wavelength 70% longer than the peak considered per unit wavelength. The relevant math is detailed in the next section.

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Wien's displacement law" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Planck's law for the spectrum of black body radiation predicts the Wien displacement law and may be used to numerically evaluate the constant relating temperature and the peak parameter value for any particular parameterization. Commonly a wavelength parameterization is used and in that case the black body spectral radiance (power per emitting area per solid angle) is:

${\displaystyle u_{\lambda }(\lambda ,T)={2hc^{2} \over \lambda ^{5}}{1 \over e^{hc/\lambda kT}-1}.}$

Differentiating u(λ,T) with respect to λ and setting the derivative equal to zero gives:

${\displaystyle {\partial u \over \partial \lambda }=2hc^{2}\left({hc \over kT\lambda ^{7}}{e^{hc/\lambda kT} \over \left(e^{hc/\lambda kT}-1\right)^{2}}-{1 \over \lambda ^{6}}{5 \over e^{hc/\lambda kT}-1}\right)=0,}$

which can be simplified to give:

${\displaystyle {hc \over \lambda kT}{e^{hc/\lambda kT} \over e^{hc/\lambda kT}-1}-5=0.}$

By defining:

${\displaystyle x\equiv {hc \over \lambda kT},}$

the equation becomes one in the single variable x:

${\displaystyle {xe^{x} \over e^{x}-1}-5=0.}$

which is equivalent to:

${\displaystyle (x-5)e^{x}+5=0.}$

This equation is easily numerically solved using Newton's method yielding ^{[note 1]} x = 4.965114231744276 to double precision floating point accuracy. Solving for the wavelength λ in units of nanometers, and using kelvins for the temperature yields:

${\displaystyle \lambda _{\text{peak}}={\frac {hc}{x}}{\frac {1}{kT}}={\frac {2.897771955185172\times 10^{6}~{\text{nm}}{\cdot }{\text{K}}}{T}}.}$

Another common parameterization is by frequency. The derivation yielding peak parameter value is similar, but starts with the form of Planck's law as a function of frequency ν:

${\displaystyle u_{\nu }(\nu ,T)={2h\nu ^{3} \over c^{2}}{1 \over e^{h\nu /kT}-1}.}$

The preceding process using this equation yields:

${\displaystyle -{h\nu \over kT}{e^{h\nu /kT} \over e^{h\nu /kT}-1}+3=0.}$

The net result is:

${\displaystyle (x-3)e^{x}+3=0.}$

This is similarly solved with Newton's method yielding x = 2.8214393721220787 to double precision floating point accuracy. Solving for ν produces:

${\displaystyle \nu _{\text{peak}}={\frac {xk}{h}}T=({0.05878923811360855~{\text{THz}}{\cdot }{\text{K}}^{-1}})\cdot {T}.}$

Notice that for a given temperature, parameterization by frequency implies a different maximal wavelength than parameterization by wavelength.

For example, using T = 6000 K and parameterization by wavelength, the wavelength for maximal spectral radiance is λ = 482.962 nm with corresponding frequency ν = 620.737 THz. For the same temperature, but parameterizing by frequency, the frequency for maximal spectral radiance is ν = 352.735 THz with corresponding wavelength λ = 849.907 nm.

These functions are radiance density functions, which are probability density functions scaled to give units of radiance. The density function has different shapes for different parameterizations, depending on relative stretching or compression of the abscissa, which measures the change in probability density relative to a linear change in a given parameter. Since wavelength and frequency have a reciprocal relation, they represent significantly non-linear shifts in probability density relative to one another.

The total radiance is the integral of the distribution over all positive values, and that is invariant for a given temperature under any parameterization. Additionally, for a given temperature the radiance consisting of all photons between two wavelengths must be the same regardless of which distribution you use. That is to say, integrating the wavelength distribution from λ₁ to λ₂ will result in the same value as integrating the frequency distribution between the two frequencies that correspond to λ₁ and λ₂, namely from c/λ₂ to c/λ₁. However, the distribution shape depends on the parameterization, and for a different parameterization the distribution will typically have a different peak density, as these calculations demonstrate.

Using the value 4 to solve the implicit equation yields the peak in the spectral radiance density function expressed in the parameter radiance per proportional bandwidth. This is perhaps a more intuitive way of presenting "wavelength of peak emission". That yields x = 3.9206903948728864 to double precision floating point accuracy.

The important point of Wien's law, however, is that any such wavelength marker, including the median wavelength (or, alternatively, the wavelength below which any specified percentage of the emission occurs) is proportional to the reciprocal of temperature. That is, the shape of the distribution for a given parameterization, scales with and translates according to temperature, and can be calculated once for a canonical temperature, then appropriately shifted and scaled to obtain the distribution for another temperature. This is a consequence of the strong statement of Wien's law.

• Wien approximation
• Emissivity
• Sakuma–Hattori equation
• Stefan–Boltzmann law
• Thermometer

• Soffer, B. H.; Lynch, D. K. (1999). "Some paradoxes, errors, and resolutions concerning the spectral optimization of human vision". American Journal of Physics. 67 (11): 946–953. Bibcode:1999AmJPh..67..946S. doi:10.1119/1.19170.
• Heald, M. A. (2003). "Where is the 'Wien peak'?". American Journal of Physics. 71 (12): 1322–1323. Bibcode:2003AmJPh..71.1322H. doi:10.1119/1.1604387.

• Eric Weisstein's World of Physics