Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morton Judd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Morton Judd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional character, fails WP:NCHAR. No stand-alone notability. Unencyclopedic: WP:FANCRUFT, WP:PLOT only written in in-universe style, no analysis from a real-world perspective. No obvious prospect for an encyclopedic article to be written. PROD added but removed. Nicknack009 (talk) 07:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Nicknack009 (talk) 07:38, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Nicknack009 (talk) 07:39, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Nicknack009 (talk) 07:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 November 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:49, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or at worst Fully Merge to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Deleting information serves no useful purpose even if a standalone article is not kept. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per Necrothesp. Just as in the Judge Grice AFD, subject appears verified but not notable per WP:GNG based on my search. BTW - Nicknack009, WP:NCHAR is clearly a failed guideline so, again, I have no idea why you're relying on it. FOARP (talk) 09:42, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (no objection to soft delete through redirect). Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • No objection to a merge, but it is surely up to those who want to keep to demonstrate some kind, any kind, of real-world notability. I agree NCHAR was the wrong policy to link to, but Wikipedia's rules on notability are clear, and Morton Judd has none as a stand-alone subject. --Nicknack009 (talk) 12:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, regarding deleting information, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Non-encyclopedic information should be deleted. --Nicknack009 (talk) 12:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect. As a plusable search term with incoming links. Fine with Merge though. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 05:25, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (no objection to redirect). Pure PLOT. Fails GNG/NFICTION.Kacper IV (talk) 11:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or Redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd - Jay (talk) 06:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.