Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Communist Party: Difference between revisions

American Communist Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Organization formed yesterday, and no indication of notability per WP:ORG or WP:GNG. They have a website with a declaration and a currently empty map of chapters. All I can find on them online is a few posts on social media, less than a day old. Ineligible for speedy A7 or a move to draft, as it was a 2003 redirect to Communist Party USA. Wikishovel (talk) 14:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and United States of America. Wikishovel (talk) 14:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I wouldn't say to delete the article. Let's at least wait a bit and see if media outlets report on this. If they don't report anything in, say, a week, then we can delete. I personally don't think the article needs to be deleted instantly. Give it some time. This is a more minor story compared to everything else happening in the USA, and I don't blame the media for not instantly reporting on it. SSBelfastFanatic (talk) 14:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, give it a week for sources to come in. Zenphia1 (talk) 16:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify – The party is absolutely not notable enough to have an article at the moment. If sources do report on it, great; it can be moved back into mainspace. If not, it can be deleted. Loytra (talk) 15:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Could not find any sources to prove notability. Do not agree with @Loytra as there's no point in draftifying article lacking any information and references.Vorann Gencov (talk) 15:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Honestly, I think I agree with you. I change my vote to delete. Loytra (talk) 15:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge It appears to be a split from the CPUSA, so if it has not yet achieved notability it can be merged into History of the Communist Party USA under WP:WITHIN. Special:Contributions/TheSands-12 15:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSands-12 (talk • contribs) [reply]

  It shouldn't go under the history of the Communist Party USA. It's not a split and it's not significant. It seems like it's a crypto currency scheme as well with opportunists like Jackson Hinkle involved. SalladTX (talk) 22:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not notable, no references. A line about it on the CPUSA page would probably be enough. Sophie (talk) 15:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into History of the Communist Party USA. Zenphia1 (talk) 15:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per previous votes. Judging by the lack of any media attention, this party split is not notable on its own. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 17:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into History of the Communist Party USA, as suggested above. --Psammeticus (talk) 19:52, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into History of the Communist Party USA. No sources whatsoever and no establishment of notability. — Czello ^(music) 19:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No WP:RS in article that need transfer to History of the Communist Party USA. SocDoneLeft (talk) 20:37, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Unique enough to be notable Braganza (talk) 21:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, Improve - Please see Talk page on the actual article for an explanation. I believe this article can become a much better article but may require restriction to prevent political bias or vandalism. Please insert into WikiProject Socialism as High Priority. Madamepestilence (talk) 22:41, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with History of the Communist Party USA or Jackson Hinkle per previous votes. Mt.FijiBoiz (talk) 22:53, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not relevant and clear vandalism being pumped by spam accounts on X/Twitter as can be seen in posts such as https://x.com/VanCommunist/status/1815489685567017259 69.113.236.98 (talk) 23:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete If there are sources supporting including this in the History of the Communist Party USA then I'm open to changing my mind but I don't believe that this even reaches that threshold. andrew.robbins (talk) 23:20, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I've just deleted the 'controversy' section which was added very recently with an admission by the ip that they had no references. Someone with more knowledge on the subject may wish to look at all the other recent edits to decide what is (and isn't) vandalism,