Karen DeSalvo

🚨 New NJ Appellate Division Decision – Fourth Amendment Rights 🚨 On February 7, 2024, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division decided State v. Haskins, examining the retroactive application of State v. Smith concerning traffic stops for tinted windows. The court deemed Haskins' appeal within the "pipeline," despite the appeal filed after the Smith decision. Khalil H. Haskins faced a traffic stop for tinted windows, which led to the seizure of illegal substances and a firearm. The motion to suppress the evidence was denied, based on State v. Cohen. However, Haskins contended the stop was unlawful under State v. Smith, which redefined reasonable suspicion for window tints. The appellate court, analyzing the retroactivity of Smith, applied a three-step process: confirming Smith as a new rule, considering its purpose for enhancing fact-finding, and assessing the impact on the administration of justice. Choosing pipeline retroactivity, the court vacated the denial of the motion to suppress, remanding the case for a review under the Smith standards, and directed that a new judge oversee the proceedings to ensure impartiality. You can read the entire case here - https://lnkd.in/eH9QGm-v Stay informed with regular legal updates from our team of former prosecutors at the Bianchi Law Group. Follow us for insightful commentary and legal analysis on criminal defense, domestic violence, and municipal court cases. 👨‍⚖️ Need legal assistance or looking to refer a case? 📲 Don't hesitate to call us 24/7 at (862) 315-7929. #FormerProsecutors #CriminalDefense #DomesticViolence #DWI #DUI #NJ #NewJersey No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of #NewJersey  🛡️ TEAM OF FORMER PROSECUTORS 🛡️ Robert (Bob) Bianchi, Esq. David Bruno, Esq. Danielle Esposito Christopher A. Eaton, Esq. Paul A. Di Lella Tricia Howarth Margolis Esq. Christina Hall Maura Lynch Robert Esnes Alessandro Amato

5

2 Comments

Attorney Spotlight: Meet Employment Law Attorney Sean M. Fontes. Sean focuses on employment law compliance and employer-side litigation. Here is a snippet of his wage and equal pay auditing experience, gained from his time leading the Legal Division at the Rhode Island Department of Labor & Training: https://ow.ly/26aB50SFclL #AttorneySpotlight #EmploymentLaw #Compliance #Litigation #pshlaw

6

🏙 New York Wednesday Job Market Update 🏙 Current Am Law 200 and elite boutique law firm openings in New York: ⚖️ Litigation: 108 👔 Corporate Law: 98 Please feel free to reach out to discuss firms and class year. #NewYorkLegalJobs #LegalRecruitment #CorporateLaw #Litigation #NewYorkWednesday

1

🔊 News from the New Jersey Supreme Court! The New Jersey Supreme Court is taking significant steps to enhance public access to the court system by posting publicly filed briefs for cases argued before the Supreme Court and Appellate Division, as announced on September 3. In support of this initiative, the Court has relaxed and supplemented Rule 1:38 and Rule 2:6-9, along with relaxing certain aspects of Rules 2:6-1(c), 2:6-6(a), and 2:8-1(a). What's the benefit? It means anyone interested in a particular case can easily learn more about the matter and issues involved. If you have any questions about how this might impact your future filings, feel free to reach out!

12

📢 There's still time to vote!! JOHNLEONARD has been listed in the Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly's 2024 Reader Rankings Award in the following categories: >Legal Recruiter - Lawyer >Legal Recruiter - Support Staff We would sincerely appreciate your vote for JOHNLEONARD in these two categories! 🗳 Click the link below to cast your votes by July 15th: https://lnkd.in/eyFeSYxr 🙌 Thank you for supporting us within the legal community! #legal #lawyer #recruiter #legalcommunity #staffingagency #vote

4

🚨 NJ Appellate Division Decision – Jurisdictional Law on Sex Abuse Litigation 🚨 On February 28, 2024, the NJ Appellate Division decided E.T., A.M., A.R., and others v. The Boys and Girls Clubs of America, reversing the lower court's decision that New Jersey courts have specific personal jurisdiction over the Boys and Girls Clubs of America (BGCA) in a case involving allegations of sexual abuse by a counselor within The Boys and Girls Clubs of Hudson County. This pivotal decision highlights the complexities of jurisdictional law, particularly in cases involving national organizations with local affiliates.   In this case, the plaintiffs alleged they were sexually abused by Arthur Freudenberg, a part-time counselor for the Hudson County BGC, between approximately 1978 and 1982. They sought compensatory and punitive damages from the local entity and the national organization, BGCA. However, jurisdictional discovery showed that BGCA, based in Georgia, did not have direct control over the local club's hiring, training, or supervision practices, including those of Freudenberg. The Appellate Division found that BGCA's connection to New Jersey, through affiliation and brand used by the Hudson County BGC, did not constitute purposeful availment of New Jersey jurisdiction concerning the allegations.   This decision significantly marks the limits of specific personal jurisdiction and underscores the need for clarity in the operational relationships between national organizations and their local affiliates.   Read the Full Decision Here: https://lnkd.in/ePagx6NE   Stay informed with regular legal updates from our team of former prosecutors at the Bianchi Law Group. Follow us for insightful commentary and legal analysis on criminal defense, domestic violence, and municipal court cases.   Need legal assistance or looking to refer a case? Don't hesitate to call us 24/7 at (862) 315-7929. #FormerProsecutors #CriminalDefense #DomesticViolence #DWI #DUI #NJ No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of #NewJersey   🛡️ TEAM OF FORMER PROSECUTORS 🛡️ Robert (Bob) Bianchi, Esq. David Bruno, Esq. Danielle Esposito, Esq. Christopher A. Eaton, Esq. Paul A. Di Lella, Esq. Tricia Howarth Margolis Esq. Christina Hall, Esq. Maura Lynch Robert Esnes Alessandro Amato

4

2 Comments

NJ Supreme Court Opens Reinstatement Path for Disbarred Attorneys On October 15, 2024, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that while disbarment remains mandatory for attorneys who knowingly misappropriate client funds, there is now a path for reinstatement. Previously, the 1979 In re Wilson decision enforced permanent disbarment without exceptions. However, the 2022 In re Wade case, involving an attorney who returned borrowed funds and had a clean record, led the Court to reconsider. A committee recommended a reinstatement process, aligning New Jersey with other states. The new order requires disbarment for misappropriation but allows reinstatement if specific conditions are met, including passing exams, a five-year waiting period, client notification, and repayment of funds. This path may also apply to attorneys disbarred for other reasons. Read the full blog post here: https://lnkd.in/eC4zXypw

1

If you believe you experienced an unfair firing as a New York employee, turn to Bantle & Levy. Our wrongful termination attorneys stand ready to represent employees — from entry-level to the executive level — and ensure that they receive the compensation and justice they deserve. https://ow.ly/tMP550U4CV8 #BantleLevy #Attorney #Lawyer #WrongfulTermination #UnlawfulFiring #LegalRepresentation #NYC #Attorneys #EmployeeRights #WorkplaceRights #EmploymentLaw #NewYork

1

2 Comments

Discover how the NJ Supreme Court's ruling on non-disparagement clauses interacts with the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination in our latest Employment client alert authored by Lowenstein’s Amy Komoroski Wiwi and Jessica Kriegsfeld. Read the full alert: https://bit.ly/4dK88i8 #employmentlaw #employers #lawyers #newjersey #discrimination

10

🚨 New Jersey Supreme Court Decision Alert 🚨 State v. Curtis L. Gartrell - A Defining Moment in Search and Seizure Law 📅 January 17, 2024 - In an influential ruling, the New Jersey Supreme Court in State v. Curtis L. Gartrell has clarified the boundaries of abandonment related to the search and seizure law. 🔍 The Case Overview: Curtis Gartrell fled from police at Newark Penn Station, leaving behind a suitcase filled with illegal items. The key legal question was whether Gartrell abandoned the suitcase, forfeiting his right to contest the warrantless search. 📜 The Court's Decision: The Court affirmed that Gartrell abandoned it by fleeing and leaving the suitcase in a public space. This decision means he cannot challenge the search, setting a significant precedent for abandonment in search and seizure cases. 🔑 Legal Implications: This ruling is a crucial guidepost for understanding the nuances of possessory interests and abandonment in criminal law. It highlights the importance of actions and intentions in determining the legality of warrantless searches. 👨‍⚖️ From the Bianchi Law Group's Lens: As former prosecutors, we recognize the balance between individual rights and law enforcement's duties. This decision underscores the complexities faced in safeguarding both. 💬 Share your thoughts: How will this ruling impact future search and seizure cases? 👉 Follow the Bianchi Law Group for more insightful legal updates and analysis. #FormerProsecutors #CriminalDefense #DomesticViolence #NewJerseyLaw #LegalInsights #SearchAndSeizure #JudicialDecision No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of #NewJersey  🛡️ TEAM OF FORMER PROSECUTORS 🛡️ Robert (Bob) Bianchi, Esq. David Bruno, Esq. Danielle Esposito Christopher A. Eaton, Esq. Tricia Howarth Margolis Esq. Maura Lynch Alessandro Amato Robert Esnes

8

2 Comments

Motions for reconsideration are used in New Jersey under the right circumstances. A motion for reconsideration is a legal document filed after a court decision that allows parties to ask the judge to reconsider the outcome of a case. However, they cannot be used just because a party disagrees with the Judge’s decision. Motions for reconsideration can only be filed if there is a clear demonstration that the judge’s decision has fallen into a specified category of error. The grounds for which these motions can be filed and granted are very specific, and extremely narrow.  Learn more about which circumstances are applicable and rely on an experienced attorney at our firm for assistance with all of your family court needs, including a motion for reconsideration.

1

Dive into the complexities of New Jersey's right of publicity laws in Lowenstein’s Matthew Savare, Jenna-Marie Tracy, and Bryan Sterba’s Q&A guide in Thomson Reuters's Practical Law, which covers everything from protected identities to legal remedies and licensing issues. Read the full article: https://bit.ly/3UjskQm #rightofpublicity #newjersey #intellectualproperty #iplaw #licensing #techlaw

8

From negotiating severance packages to fighting against a wrongful termination, our executive representation attorneys are here to protect your employee rights and professional interests. Schedule your consultation with our office in New York today. https://ow.ly/SHBq50Rv7uq #BantleLevy #EmploymentLawyer #EmploymentLaw #ExecutiveRepresentation #Severance #WrongfulTermination #Law #Legal #NewYork

1

Explore our diverse practice areas! We provide expert counsel across 15 practice areas, ensuring responsive and cost-effective legal solutions. Whether you need individual counsel or a multidisciplinary team, we're here to protect your interests. Learn more about how we can help you: https://lnkd.in/eT7ggCcr #CertilmanBalin #LegalServices #LawFirm #PracticeAreas #FullService

3

Understanding Receiverships in Partnership Disputes with Pitcoff Law Group: https://lnkd.in/e_6fFuh3 #receiverships #partnershipdisputes #disputeresolution

10