User talk:Matěj Suchánek

Please whitelist adding 2-6 uppercase letters as label/alias. There're probably abbreviations, like Special:AbuseFilter/examine/log/498007.--GZWDer (talk) 09:41, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@GZWDer: This is how it should work by the way. If I had to modify the filter per you, it would be only aimed on descriptions... Matěj Suchánek (talk) 13:52, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

False positive.

P31
299ed3e574afd6d6a6edec4190c365a1cfb6e08c
item
10876391

--GZWDer (talk) 14:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@GZWDer: Thank you for watching the logs. Indeed this is caused by a change in generating wikitext-like variables for items. I will modify it. Thank you very much! Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:14, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Matěj Suchánek.Excuse me I maked a mistake for this subject. I will do my best for avoid mistakes in the future. Sorry Mortier.Daniel (talk) 08:41, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dobrý den,

narazil jsem na tento nástroj, ale nerozumím tomu, jak se používá, pomohl byste mi? Příklady, kde byl asi jednoduše využit, ale nerozumím tomu jak:

• 1
• 2
• 3

Předem děkuji za ochotu. Wesalius (talk) 07:33, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tak už jsem se to tak nějak naučil během řešení tohoto požadavku. Wesalius (talk) 09:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wesalius: Už jsem to měl rozepsané, tak to nezahodím...

Abys ho mohl používat naplno, nauč se formát WDQ: [1]. Je to vlastně dotazovací systém na databázi Wikidat. Nějaké příklady jsou na stránce Wikidata:List of queries. K příkladům:

1. Do pole Manual item list překopíruju všechny položky, spustím nástroj (Run) a do Controls, co se potom objeví vpravo, zadám
   P360:Q11281928
-P360:Q864.
2. S využitím WDQ, do pole WDQ zadám claim[735:1450800] a posléze do Controls
   P735:Q1166840
-P735:Q1450800
3. Využitím kategorie, pro Category:Sopranos (Q7042843) do Wiki zadám cs, wikipedia, do Category Sopranisté a sopranistky a do WDQ claim[412]. Správně zkombinuju datasety, tedy v pořadí OR, OR, NOT, OR. Potom, co nástroj doběhne, do Controls zadám P412:Q30903

Nějaký příklad, co dělám já: všechny položky, co mají jak P107 (P107), tak instance of (P31), a tak můžeme P107 odstranit.

Na cokoliv, co nebudeš chápat, se můžeš zeptat. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 09:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Děkuji mnohokrát, tohle mi dost pomůže. Za chvilku ty queries snad vstřebám a začnu tenhle skvělý nástroj taky používat. Wesalius (talk) 09:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chtěl jsem si osvojit další práci s Autolist2, otevřel jsem si tedy na cs.wiki zastřešující kategorii Lidé podle činnosti a napadlo mě: Kdybych chtěl např. lidem zakategorizovaným mezi policisty přiřadit police officer (Q384593), bylo by lepší použít k tomu occupation (P106) nebo field of work (P101)? A jak s těmito souvisí profession (Q28640)? Pokud poradíte nějakou podobně beginner-friendly činnost, tak budu rád. Díky Wesalius (talk) 22:17, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

K policistům se hodí occupation (P106). (Každá vlastnost má svoji diskusní stránku, kde jsou nahoře nějaké doplňující informace.)

Jakákoliv pomoc na Wikidatech se hodí, třeba zrovna to, co sis navrhl. Jestli to chceš dělat intenzivně, požádej si o příznak robota pro HypoBota.

Co se týče beginner-friendly – Wikidata Game znáš? Tam se taky pracuje s povoláními. Nebo taky můžeš českým osobám doplňovat data narození (ještě zbývá asi 9000).

A jestli pracuješ na Wikizdrojích, někteří autoři nemají přes Wikidata přiřazenou stránku na Wikipedii.

A takhle bych mohl pokračovat... Matěj Suchánek (talk) 13:40, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

O příznak jsem zažádal.

The game znám :-)

O diskuzní stránku u properties jsem předtím nezavadil - díky.

Jak třeba vyfiltruju z tohoto opravdu jen skladatele, abych tam neměl alba, seznamy skladatelů atd.?

Díky. --Wesalius (talk) 16:01, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vyfiltruj si je v poli WDQ pomocí klíčových tvrzení (pokud chceš jen lidi, přidej claim[31:5]).

Srovnej s [2]

Někdy, když mám více času a zájem, jsem i na IRC (matej_suchanek) a tam jsou i další lidi, co ti pomůžou, včetně vývojářů.

Zmínil jsem Wikizdroje: http://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/1816 (pokud umíš SQL, otevírají se ti další možnosti, jak pracovat s Wikidaty).

Máš u mě podporu pro robota, ale zapomněl jsi na to asi nejdůležitější.

Hodně štěstí. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 19:20, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, they are the same! --Custeped (talk) 17:44, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Custeped: Does positive equal to negative? Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:46, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They are on the same topic.--Custeped (talk) 17:52, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do they describe the same concept? It seems one of them is a part of the second one. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:57, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is also true, indeed here I've done a redirect, because they are on the same topic.--Custeped (talk) 18:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Probably enable tagging? Why there are 127.0.0.1 in AbuseLog?--GZWDer (talk) 14:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because of phab:T59815. Ping 분당선M. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 14:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dobrý den, naleznu někde dokumentaci, kde bych se dověděl, jaké příkazy přijdou do okna Commands v autolistu (zatím umím jen přidávat nebo odnímat tvrzení)? Když jsem pročítal dokumentaci k WDQ, tak tam je popsáno, jakým různým způsobem hledat a filtrovat položky na wikidatech. Ale když budu chtít např. upravit label položek [3] [4], aby neobsahoval tu pomlčku na konci, tak jak to udělám? Děkuji za radu. --Wesalius (talk) 08:07, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nevím o tom, že by AutoList upravoval štítky. Musíš použít QuickStatements a výpis pomocí Quarry. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 14:51, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Matěj Suchánek. I understand your answer, but I don't know how can I do it ("mark it" ?). Could you explain it a little bit more ? Thanks.--Sammyday (talk) 16:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think i found how[5]. Could you confirm ? Thanks.--Sammyday (talk) 16:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, well done. But I have also seen the said to be the same as (P460) being a qualifer rather than a single statement, so I will change it. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hellon Matěj Suchánek,

You just undid 2 editions I did ([[6] and [[7]]), just following instructions by Michiel1972, see my PDD.

Could you please explain what is the problem with those edits ? as I did hundreds of the same type these past days, and I'd prefer to understand, rather than work for nothing :) If the problem is with one of the links (I only work with fr, en and ru), could be necessary to fix the link, as I did yesterday on a dozen russian links that were on the wrong items... ;)

Thanks for your help, --Hsarrazin (talk) 13:01, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hsarrazin: I did these reverts because of Freebase ID (P646). Matěj Suchánek (talk) 13:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand, I just added that "1952–53 Luxembourg National Division" was an instance of "Luxembourg National Division", which it is, undoubtedly…

what Freebase ID is doing here ? what is the problem with this statement ? did you read Michiel's message on my pdd ? should those items be treated differently ? if so, why, and how ?

thanks for more explanations, please, because I don't understand the consequences of those edits/undedits... --Hsarrazin (talk) 13:37, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

oh, sorry, I just went back through these items history...

I did not see the wrong Freebase ID (P646) edits, that were done by accident, and certainly uwillingly… - and I don't even understand how they could happen :(( sorry :/ --Hsarrazin (talk) 13:46, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ahoj, zase jsem se trochu snažil zušlechtit položku John Cale (Q45909) a napadlo mě pár věcí, které by tam mohly být:
1) John Cale byl vlastníkem hudebního vydavatelství SPY Records (Q3459974) a nahrávacího studia A.R.M. Studio (Q19367151). Tam je vlastnost owned by (P127), což je vše v pořádku, ale napadlo mě na tyto položky odkázat i od majitele, tedy vytvořit něco jako „owner of“. Zkoušel jsem to najít, ale marně
2) Existuje vlastnost list of works (P1455), která je myslím spíš pro bibliografii. Chtěl bych ale odkázat na seznam písní list of John Cale songs (Q17280100) a jelikož je podobných seznamů hodně velké množství, napadlo mě založit samostatnou vlastnost, něco jako „list of songs“
Takže k věci: Předpokládám, že máš nějaké zkušenosti s navrhováním nových vlastností, tudíž se na tebe obracím s tím, jestli a) nevyvrátíš mé dojmy a neřekneš, že jsou to nesmysly a jdou vyřešit jednodušeji a b) případně nepomůžeš s navržením.
S pozdravem Marek Koudelka (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ahoj:

1. Vlastník nemá „inverse“, takže opačně to nejde. Ale stojí to za navržení (viz dále).
2. Možná by šlo zobecnit tu vlastnost na seznam (jakéhokoliv) díla a vymezit pomocí of (P642).

Žádné přímé zkušenosti nemám :( Začni na WD:PP. Opak vlastníka bych navrhl na WD:Property proposal/Person a nazval bych to „owner of“. Kdybysis nevěřil, udělám to za tebe. U toho seznamu bych se zeptal na WD:PC, jak se to spojuje. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:09, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Díky za reakci. Se seznamem je to dobrý nápad, protože je pravda, že někde může existovat třeba seznam videoklipů nebo tak něco a pro to by bylo zbytečné zakládat vlastnost. Takže souhlasím, jedna pro všechno by byla nejlepší. Zeptat se můžeš, asi lépe ty, protože já s tím nemám (a snad ani nechci mít) žádné zkušenosti. Ohledně navržení jsem na tu stránku taky narazil, ale nechtělo se mi tím protloukat… Takže pokud to uděláš za mě, budu rád :-) --Marek Koudelka (talk) 16:25, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Díky, vidím, že jsi již vše provedl. Měl bych ještě jeden dotaz: Netušíš, proč se na stránce Izumi Šikibu zobrazuje jako datum darození „0976“ (s nulou)? Položka WD vypadá v pořádku… --Marek Koudelka (talk) 17:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Není vůbec zač. Ten John Cale vypadá fakt skvěle! Možná bys k ocenění mohl doplnit, kdo mu to dal, a taky je tam u ocenění Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (Q179191) duplicitní reference. K té chybě: zatím jsem nikde neviděl data z Wikidat pod 1000. Takže to může být jak špatný modul, který parsuje čas, tak můj vlastní, který datum formátuje, anebo taky jedna z mnoha chyb týkající se špatného ukládání časových údjaů (hledal jsem teď odpovídající hlášení, ale nenašel ho). Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:52, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Díky, snažil jsem se, aby vypadal líp než jakákoliv jiná položka :-) Duplicita odstraněná, ocenění mu předala Patti Smith (Q557). Díky za návrh. No a Řád britského impéria mu předal Charles III (Q43274). Ty čestné tituly jsou asi nezjistitelné a to polské ocenění možná ano, ale nemyslím si, že by to bylo nějak významné. Pokud je to tedy bráno tak, z čí rukou jej převzal a ne tak, že jej dostal třeba od Antverpské univezity (to tam je jako location). Co jsem koukal do použití, vypadá to spíš na tu druhou variantu. Co myslíš? Ten rok tedy ber jako upozornění na chybu. --Marek Koudelka (talk) 18:05, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Byl to jen návrh, já to teda použil tady takto. To datum už jsem skoro opravil, konečně jsem se naučil ladit modul pomocí konzole (takže vlastně se díky tobě zlepším v tvorbě modulů). Matěj Suchánek (talk) 18:41, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Byl to výborný návrh, udělám to taky, jen jsem se zarazil, když jsem viděl použití jinde. --Marek Koudelka (talk) 18:46, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just wondering how you merged this one? Because after the merge, the birth and death properties appeared twice (before I removed them), and as far as I've seen that doesn't normally happen when merging. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 17:01, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jon, if those dates had been same, I believe they would have been merged. But they were not. To understand see what is usually done by bots about this. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:05, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so one was saved as 1934-00-00 and one as 1934-01-01? Got it. Just wonder why it's done that way (by bots and/or the software), but it's not that important. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 17:10, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Right. AFAIK the developers are working on better adding and storing date values, so this can propably get fixed soon. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:23, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I saw your comment on the PfD for category combines topics (P971) [8]:

My opinion is that is a list of (P360) and category combines topics (P971) have different purpose and that everything was okay until someone misunderstood one of these properties.

If you think what is proposed for P360 is not a good idea, it would be useful to have your contribution at Property_talk:P360#P360_and_categories to explain why you think it is not a good idea; because there are a number of people, including myself, who think that applying the richer syntax of P360 to categories would be extremely useful, delivering information that the syntax of P971 simply does not. So if you don't agree, it would be good to know why. If P360 is used in the way suggested, it's hard to see a rationale for keeping P971, because the same information would conveyed by P360, in a more, exact detailed way. So it would be good to have your input on the P360 talk page. Jheald (talk) 19:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jheald, you are right that I should have participated to the discussion. My opinion came from the fact that I like the current system (people born/died here) and that I am maybe afraid of the change which the deletion / the merger would cause. Tomorrow I will read everything ever said around this issue and try to learn more and find the best solution as you do. I have already added the talk page to my watchlist. Best regards. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 20:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Matej,

I was wondering if you would consider voting on Wikidata:Property_proposal/Person#hair_color. It's a bit odd that it just gets opposed as the field isn't used in some Wikipedias. --- Jura 17:04, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jura, thanks for poking me, I will summarize my thoughts and vote. Regards Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:23, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Matěj Suchánek,

for the: fr:15e_arrondissement_de_Paris, I do not understand how to have Commons:Category:Paris 15e arrondissement appear. Can you help?--DDupard (talk) 16:32, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DDupard: See Q191066#P373, there is already one link. Where do you want it to appear? In the article? There should be a template which allows linking to Commons. I don't know, I am not editor of frwiki. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:40, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Matěj Suchánek: well here it is : There are 2 entries for the same subject: 15th arrondissement of Paris (Q191066) and Category:15th arrondissement of Paris (Q7470156), OK; "The link Commonswiki:Category Paris 15e arrondissement is already used by item Q7470156 you may remove it if it does not belong there or merge the two items if they are about the same topic", That is the message I get. Can you do that, merge the 2 entries?  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by DDupard (talk • contribs).

I can but I won't. As there are two separate items, for subject and for category, the link to Commons should stay in the category item. In the subject item, the link is replaced by Commons category property (until the arbitrary access comes). Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:49, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK Thank you @Matěj Suchánek:, that is an answer.:)--DDupard (talk) 18:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you tell me the reason why you reverted this [9] ? It made sense to me and I am quite suprised ? :-) Thieol (talk) 16:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thieol, I am doing an occupation (P106) cleanup cleaning up profession (Q28640) items is related with. Items with instance of (P31): profession (Q28640) shouldn't have field of work (P101) but field of this occupation (P425). Matěj Suchánek (talk) 19:41, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks ! :-) Thieol (talk) 13:11, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ahoj, všiml jsem si, že se v iboxech na cs iw zobrazují rozlišovače, pokud jsou vloženy zde na WD. Příkladem je Q291644, kde u politické strany je rozlišovač (Norsko); u nás v článku jsem to vyřešil vložením daného parametru a tedy přepsáním. jak se tomu zobrazování rozlišovačů vyhnout? Předpokládám, že by to mělo mít řešení (např. vložením na WD Konzervativní strana (Norsko)|Konzervativní strana ?). Měj se--Kacir (talk) 18:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Výsledná hodnota je v tomto případě [[odkaz|štítek]]. Takže mně se nabízí, když se nám zobrazuje rozlišovač, proč ho prostě neodmazat ze štítku? Chápu, jak to myslíš, ale to by vzhledem k funkci štítků nešlo. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 19:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A pokud rozlišovač odmažeme ze štítku, nepovede odkaz v článku na Konzervativní strana?--Kacir (talk) 21:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kaciri, viz výše [[odkaz|štítek]]. Tedy odkaz povede správně. --Marek Koudelka (talk) 12:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Přesně, že štítek nějak ovlivní odkaz do Wikipedie, je mýtus. Mohou být stejné, často bývají stejné, ale nemusí (srov. s malými písmeny). Matěj Suchánek (talk) 13:16, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dobře, můžete editovat tu Ernu Solbergovou a upravit stranu, abych měl jasno? Odstranil jsem rozlišovač a štítek vede na britskou Konzervativní stranu, namísto norské. Díky.--Kacir (talk) 16:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Změnit tvrzení bylo špatně, rozlišovač jsi vlastně neodstranil, pouze jsi vybral jinou politickou stranu se štítkem Konzervativní strana. Norskou konzervativní stranu neidentifikuje štítek, ale Q586364. To už tam bylo, takže stačilo změnit štítek v položce Q586364. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:38, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

uff, dík, tak teď už je mi to konečně jasné... :) --Kacir (talk) 20:46, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just spotted this edit. I'm not sure this is a good idea - for something like position held (P39):President of the United States (Q11696), having "officeholder" makes sense, but a lot of P39 instances are things like Member of Parliament (Q16707842), where there are several hundred current officeholders. Andrew Gray (talk) 19:54, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see. It will indeed be better to keep only the constraint for officeholder (P1308). Matěj Suchánek (talk) 20:08, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! This edit appeared in my watchlist, and it made me discover ecclesiastical occupation (Q11773926). Unfortunately, there was only one label on that item, and all my knowledge of Czech comes from Google translate. So, it seems that the article title is "ecclesiastical title", but its content is about ecclesiastical address (Q3562482). Is that right? In that case, would it be suitable to merge both items? Andreasm ^{háblame / just talk to me} 20:30, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think they are same. I came to the item through the category Category:Ecclesiastical titles (Q5896548) where the Czech article about metropolitan (Q189854) is, but I didn't check its interwiki.

By the way, I don't think this is correct. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 11:31, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings.I have made an edit to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4802481 as per wikipedia.Kindly check it once to ensure that the fields are entered correctly.Many Thanks Rama2015 (talk) 02:41, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this not catched?--GZWDer (talk) 13:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, it was catched but not tagged. Sadly, it seems to be another Wikibase × AF bug. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 13:28, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it is absolutely essential that your bot marks the language version as a reference or in the edit commentary: Here I had a hard time to find out which sitelink shouldn't be in the item. -- Gymel (talk) 13:02, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if it's a good idea to add it to that page in the first place (P279 being present). --- Jura 13:07, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for this, sadly AutoList offers neither edit summaries or references. To reduce false positives which very often occur on marking as disambiguation, I always apply strong additional filters but this time I forgot about subclass of (P279). (You have probably found out that I used sl.wiki as source). Matěj Suchánek (talk) 13:15, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then I'd like to suggest that you'll take the extra step to transform the result of autolist into something suitable for QuickStatements which allows references. -- Gymel (talk) 14:17, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Matěj Suchánek,

When reverting other users contributions, please add an explanation detailing why you do so. It can be added at the end of the prefiled edit note. --- Jura 15:17, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

+1 on Jura's comment. I don't understand why you deleted the definition for Leafminer here. It was a perfectly good definition, and you replaced it with nothing. What's the rationale behind this? Sylverfysh (talk) 20:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My fault, sorry. I take vandalism very seriously, so from time to time it happens on my side that I revert an edit without checking. Sorry again. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 06:26, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In the page you have marked for translation today after I have requested it, there are errors if I want to translate the new sections to translate. --MGChecker (talk) 19:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand you. Could you please describe the problem more? Hope we can find the solution quickly. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 19:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I could't save translations for "all remaining Wikisource" and "all remaining Wikisource", but now it works. --MGChecker (talk) 20:54, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, first thanks for creating this filter. However, I detected an issue with it: If the same snak gets added as a mainsnak of a statement and as a snak for a qualifier, the filter also marks them as duplicate. This happened for example here (diff). It would be great if you fixed that issue. Best regards -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 21:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Special:AbuseFilter/history/56/diff/prev/763 Matěj Suchánek (talk) 08:05, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is the CSS for Template:Shortcut in MediaWiki:Common.css still needed? Wikibase now uses the firstHeading for the caption. --Fomafix (talk) 11:42, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure, if nothing gets broken, we probably don't need it anymore. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 14:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which problem do you wanted to fix with this CSS definition? --Fomafix (talk) 20:12, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember exactly now, maybe I added it just because there were some problems or I wanted to be sure it wouldn't change after a software change. I do remember I added it together with the indicators, thus I didn't intend to fix anything. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 20:35, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is bad. Please give a reason for this CSS definition or remove it. --Fomafix (talk) 20:47, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, a little brainstorming: this is the addition and this is the change in the template. My change got first reverted by Bene* but we discussed it and the change could be applied again then. On the talk page I said: "It needs styling because indicators (.mw-indicator) have width: 20px; by default which is too short for this one." So this was probably the reason. However, it seems I found out that we didn't need the width anymore lately and removed it. And then something about headings got changed in Wikibase and I don't know what the change means. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 06:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]