This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose all. We often use "biblical figure" to disambiguate, but "biblical" is an adjective - we don't use "Bible figure". Here, "Genesis" is a noun - I don't think there is an adjective relating to "Genesis". (Though "Pentateuchal" is common enough). StAnselm (talk) 22:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I personally have no problem with "Genesis" as a disambiguator, and am inclined to keep them all the same for reasons of consistency (though I realize that most characters in Genesis do not have this disambiguator). StAnselm (talk) 02:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In Wikipedia's earlier years, it was commonplace to see parenthetical qualifiers such as "(Alabama)" or "(Montana)", but those qualifiers were subsequently moved to "(Alabama politician)" or "(Montana settler)", with the edit summary positing that the individual in question was "not an Alabama" or "was not a "Montana". I will leave it to consensus (WP:LOCALCONSENSUS ?) for a determination whether one can be described as "a Genesis" or whether the qualifier form "(Montana settler)" can be analogous to the qualifier form "(Genesis figure)". —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs)04:45, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think "Name (Book)" is not as bad as "Name (Place)", since the relation between the person and the disambiguator is clearer. Is "Politician (Alabama)" a politician born in Alabama, raised in Alabama, elected in Alabama or serving in Alabama? Srnec (talk) 16:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose. I don't see a real problem with the current titles here. As noted by Srnec, there are a lot of articles with titles in the format of "Name (BookName)", "Name (TVshowName)", "Name (VideoGameName)", so I don't really see a problem here. More broadly, "Name (context)" is common, as in "Name (basketball)", for example. What is the problem with the current titles? — BarrelProof (talk) 05:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
