Talk:Iced Out Audemars

	Iced Out Audemars has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result March 18, 2021 Articles for deletion Kept March 19, 2021 Good article nominee Listed
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Hip-hop Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

This review is transcluded from Talk:Iced Out Audemars/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 10:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will review this soon, per your request... a bit ironic since I originally nominated it for deletion. --K. Peake 10:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Infobox looks good!
• The remix release sentence should be swapped with the drill and lyrics sentence for the correct order; you can have the final para dedicated to the remix
• "A remix that" → "A remix of the song that"
• "Musically a drill track, the lyrics" → "A drill track, the lyrics"
• "finer things in life and expressing their love for Dior and" → "finer things and expressing their love for Dior, among"
• Remove the chorus and outro parts, as this is too specific for the lead

• "known their real names" → "known under their respective real names of"
• "Khadafi Julio. It was written alongside" → "Khadafi Julio, alongside"
• Remove repetition of Khadafi Julio under writing credits
• Why is the additional producer not mentioned here and in the lead? Bare in mind, it's not like the infobox where you can't add them.
• "debut deluxe studio album," → "debut studio album"
• Remove release year in brackets, as it is specified later on in the sentence
• Introduce Lil Wayne as being a rapper

• "during the chorus" → "during both the chorus" with the pipe
• "He pays homage to" → "Lil Wayne pays homage to" but this should start a new para in the section, as it and the following sentences total up to four
• "we gone tomorrow"." → "we gone tomorrow."" per MOS:QUOTE on full quotes
• Pipe Wu-Tang to Wu-Tang Clan
• Pipe pitched to Pitch (music)

• "[Pop Smoke]] would" → "[Pop Smoke] would"
• "Complex's Jessica McKinney opined that" → "McKinney opined that"
• "while The Fader's Jordan Darville wrote that Lil Wayne added" → "while Darville wrote the rapper contributes" to avoid overusing his stage name
• "Jon Powell for Revolt commented that Lil Wayne" → "Jon Powell, for Revolt, commented that he"
• "and said "New York's" → "and said that "New York's"

• Pipe Bashar Jackson to Pop Smoke
• Swap featured artist and songwriter
• Swap songwriting and programming

• Copyvio score looks very good at 23.7%!
• Make sure all of these are archived by using the tool
• HypeBeast → Hypebeast on ref 12

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 14:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake thanks a lot for the review. Only a few more articles to go! The Ultimate Boss (talk) 20:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Ultimate Boss ✓ Pass now and there were some mistakes but they were not the changes themselves being missed so I copyedited the fixes in, plus good luck with the GT! --K. Peake 21:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]