Talk:Uriel Frisch

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Physics: Fluid Dynamics / Biographies Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce. This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce. This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

I think MOS prescribes a separate section for publications. Would it be OK to move the primary sources to a section "selected publications" and replace them with "sfn" in the main text? (that's what I have almost done a sec. ago, but canceled my edit due to ec) Sasha (talk) 01:12, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is there some way of doing this so that they're properly linked from the article text, the way the footnotes are? If so then splitting out the research and selected publications section into two sections, with the sentence about the book as a lead for the selected publications section, seems like a reasonable way to go. But I don't know how to do this and maintain the links, myself. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:36, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will show what I mean, have a look in 10 minutes now. Sasha (talk) 01:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]