• 2600:6c5a:447f:6600:d9c6:71c0:3cd7:678f (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) This individual keeps changing the pages for Ganden Monastery and Tsonkhapa self promoting an individual claiming to be Tsongkhapa reborn, a Buddhist teacher who lived in the 15th century. While this tradition does have embodiements called Tulkus, the individual in question has not been recognized as such by Ganden Monastery nor by the wider Gelug Tradition which the historical Tsongkhapa founded. This would be tantamount to changing the section on Jesus Christ to 'He was found this year in Illinois.' It is religious promotion.

  Page protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:12, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  Warned user. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:12, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Lingzong (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) This individual keeps changing the pages for Ganden Monastery and Tsonkhapa self promoting an individual claiming to be Tsongkhapa reborn, a Buddhist teacher who lived in the 15th century. While this tradition does have embodiements called Tulkus, the individual in question has not been recognized as such by Ganden Monastery nor by the wider Gelug Tradition which the historical Tsongkhapa founded. This is just self serving advertisement.

  Stale report. User has not edited in 2 weeks. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:12, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  Page protected. semi pp x 2 weeks. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:15, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently

Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 2 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

• Pupaspam (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "spam" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:50, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  Not a violation of the username policy. User appears to be editing construtively. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:32, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Seventhstarofaseventhstar (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Radica17 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See userpage and Draft:The Radical Elements. jlwoodwa (talk) 00:22, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

  Not a blatant violation of the username policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. I don't think this is a violation, the name is not identical to the [whatever this 'Radical Elements' is], and they've disclosed their COI. I posted a warning against promo editing. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:56, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

• RizzlerOfOhio69InThe (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:04, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

  Not a blatant violation of the username policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. Spicy (talk) 21:14, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

• Courageware (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Spammy draft with Courageware referral link. Wikishovel (talk) 18:22, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

  They are just trying to get affiliate links. It's probably just an online handle. Secretlondon (talk) 21:17, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

• CARTWiLLS (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:56, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

  Being discussed with the user. I zapped the spam as well. El Beeblerino ^{if you're not into the whole brevity thing} 00:04, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Psci2024 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:12, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  Being discussed with the user. El Beeblerino ^{if you're not into the whole brevity thing} 00:19, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Gaylordlover (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Synorem (talk) 00:58, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Gaylord is a surname. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:47, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

• Monsterverse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP that previously edit-warred on the page has returned to restore the same disruptive edits. Armegon (talk) 02:20, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have, in fact, given them their last warning. Daniel Case (talk) 03:20, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• 24 Oras (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Hotwiki (talk) 02:38, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2600:8801:44A1:1E00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Nazi Lowriders (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive IP editing removing sourced content, adding unsourced, along with formatting errors. IPs have been noticed and issues persist. IP may have a COI. ButlerBlog (talk) 03:04, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Disruption continues. 3 separate IPs over a few days have tried to removed the entire article including citations and replace it with an entirely unsourced version. Each time it's the same version, suggesting all three IPs are the same person. (It has violated WP:3RR, but the last time as a different IP) Warnings have been posted, but ignored. Since they continue to use different IPs, page protection seems to be a better alternative than blocking the IP. ButlerBlog (talk) 01:55, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2607:F380:8C9:3011:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. For a week. Daniel Case (talk) 03:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• The Manchester College (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Blocked user claiming that they are notable proceeded to vandalize. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 05:58, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Happyfunnyui48484i4 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Angolan Civil War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Operation Restore (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Recent incidents of edit warring between users and IPs. This might be the same operator that started the first edit war. Apprently, the IP involves are proxy IPs. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 17:11, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Various IPs, by different admins. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Template:New Edition (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption from Ohio and Western Pennsylvania IPs. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Youngstown music vandal. The same protection is needed at New Edition, Template:Gang Starr and Template:N.W.A. Binksternet (talk) 18:00, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2600:1016:B071:14CD:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• List of South Korean billionaires by net worth (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, new accounts and ip. I'm trying to update the list with a new reference but I will wait until there is protection. Knitsey (talk) 18:07, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:59, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Shia Islam in Iraq (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Skitash (talk) 19:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• The customer is always right (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Currently under pending changes to stop IPs from erroneously adding the unsourced internet myth "full version" of the quote, but given that such an edit was just approved, semi-protection may make more sense. Belbury (talk) 19:37, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Daniel Chapo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LaffyTaffer (talk) 19:52, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Both disrupting editors, indef as NOTHERE. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

IPs were also contributing to the disruption and continue to do so. LaffyTaffer (talk) 04:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• BigXthaPlug (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – three consecutive incidents of birth name being altered against source. Heythereimaguy (talk) 20:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:23, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Massive (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent vandalism BananaBreadPie12 (talk) 20:27, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• 2025 PDC World Darts Championship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing darts event subject to repetitive vandalism including many edits against consensus. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 20:28, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. It's one IP. How can they know they're doing wrong if you don't tell them? Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Amda Seyon I (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: editor removing content Magherbin (talk) 20:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Danielle Bradbery (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Her stalker has continued to go into her page & make changes including saying they are married, adding his last name to her legal name, and adding in an AI created photo of them "together". He continues to make these changes after I have gone in & updated her personal information to be correct and after I included sources to further verify the information I am submitting is correct. OKD97 (talk) 22:58, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

FYI this person is also doing the same on other language Wikis - Danielle Bradbery [it; uk]. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 23:17, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator The Bushranger. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Suzuki Spacia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Increasingly-frequent disruption from IP socks of an LTA, User:Alex Neman. The IPs are from such disparate ranges that blocking is not possible. --Sable232 (talk) 23:54, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:32, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Murder of Sara Sharif (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content and unsourced commentary over the past week by IP editors. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Torah (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: vandalism AstronomyMaster1 (talk) 01:45, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:47, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• New York Rangers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of vandalism, especially people disparaging the team. It was temporarily protected from December 3 to December 5, but is still being vandalised. Cyrobyte (talk) 02:38, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Rachael Gunn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism ForsythiaJo (talk) 04:11, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Juan Soto (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Couple IP address trying to add unsources Juan Soto didn't re–signed with the Yankees he signed with the Mets so is unsources by couple IP address. 148.76.226.154 (talk) 04:58, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

If other IP address continued to add unsources adding re–signed with the Yankees which is not true, Juan Soto did signed with the Mets then I will request Indefinitely protection for now I will try to request Temporary protection. 148.76.226.154 (talk) 05:05, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

• City Line (Merseytravel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Move protection was never really needed because there is no history of bad moves. Unprotection is needed because the page should be (uncontroversially) moved to match the sentence case of the other Merseyrail/Merseytravel and also to follow how Transport for London underground and overground lines are named. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:10, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Pinging @Redrose64, who originally protected the page. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:47, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Uncontroversial page moves may be requested at WP:RM/TR. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:30, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

• David Stern (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: The page was marked as being protected due to BLP, and is still listed under that reason despite Stern dying in 2020. I am making this request per this discussion, and I am very hesitant to do so, given my concerns about the page possibly being vandalized again (hence why making the edit request was my first choice) but maybe that's just me. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 12:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

If you have concerns about the page possibly being vandalised, why are you requesting a reduction in protection level? — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Because Cyberdog958 recommended I do so in the linked discussion. Note also the part above where I said "maybe that's just me." 100.7.34.111 (talk) 14:04, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

• Zsa Zsa Gabor (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Gabor dying in 2016. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 12:12, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Unprotected Daniel Case (talk) 05:00, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Herbert Sandler (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Sandler dying in 2019. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 12:13, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Unprotected Daniel Case (talk) 05:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Ian Waddell (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Waddell dying in 2021. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 12:13, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Unprotected Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Bernie Madoff (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Madoff dying in 2021. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 12:13, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Unprotected Daniel Case (talk) 05:03, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Mike Weatherley (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Weatherley dying in 2021. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 12:14, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Unprotected Daniel Case (talk) 05:04, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

• Israel–Hamas war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Change 16,000 civilians (May 2024)[43] to 16,000 civilians (May 2024)[42]

Source 42 has these numbers and source 43 doesn't Alderman pained dios finnish (talk) 18:48, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

• TheBirdsShedTears (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have created 400+ well-sourced articles on military, history, literature, politics, and academia, including recent BLPs. I believe i meet the criteria for autopatrolled rights. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot ^talk 08:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Pinging Joe Roe and Xaosflux, who responded to a similar request by this user in October of this year. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:25, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

See also the discussion on their recent NPR request. – Joe (talk) 09:07, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Right then. I've looked at the previous decline and the related NPR discussion. I guess the message has already been sent that being open and transparent at the time of the application is good and needed. I've checked the last ten articles and they were all of clean nature.  Done Schwede66 01:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• Jacketpocket (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Dear Wikipedia admins, at User:Pbritti's kind suggestion I'm requesting autopatrol rights to help reduce the NPP backlog a little. I've been a Wikipedia editor for almost 20 years, and although dormant most of that time, have been involved in the WikiProject Plants stub-to-start drive for most of this year and have also created around 40 new Start-quality articles for species in the Aquilegia genus (plus a couple of related articles) in that time. Jacketpocket (talk) 17:32, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• Royalesignature (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I respectfully request autopatrol and patrol rights, based on my extensive experience and contributions to Wikipedia. With over 12 months of experience, I've created 60+ articles and improved 100+ others. Granting my request will streamline the New Page Patrol process. I previously requested these rights last month, which was denied. Since then, I've improved my contributions. I believe my dedication and improvement warrant reconsideration. Thank you for considering my request. Royalesignature (talk). 03:08, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot ^talk 03:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Anuwrites (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I'm short of 3,000 edits requirement (currently at 2,400). I request page-moving rights as I'm encountering problems when reviewing new pages. Specifically, I face issues leaving redirects to (bad) pages I move to the draft space. Page-moving rights would help prevent redirects from being flagged for speedy deletion. ANU^writes 13:29, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 2377 total edits. — MusikBot ^talk 13:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

@Anuwrites: If you use the MoveToDraft script, it will automatically tag the move redirect for deletion, at which point it takes little work for an admin to check and delete the redirect (with no additional work for you). The script will also show a warning if you try draftifying an article within an hour of its last edit despite WP:NPPHOUR, as happened in this move yesterday. And it will leave a notification on the talk page of the article's creator, which you should be doing as explained at WP:DRAFTNOTIFY. Based on that, there isn't sufficient cause to make an exception to the guidelines for granting, plus your draftifications could still do with checking.  Not done. SilverLocust 💬 16:15, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

@SilverLocust Thank you for simplying the process for me, seems like I didn't need the right at this time, I installed the "MoveToDraft script" and it has done awesome on Draft:Hiroshi Suzuki (ambassador) page. This is all that I wanted, CIAO. ANU^writes 22:47, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done, with no prejudice to filing again once the minimum numerical requirements are met and a need is demonstrated. Primefac (talk) 15:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• SparklingBlueMoon (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I monitor recent edits to combat vandalism and improve articles, I also act on drafts, I have a good knowledge of Wikipedia rules. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC) SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

• Jolielover (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an active patroller of recent changes and quite often see awaiting pending changes; I would like to receive the permission to accept/deny changes. I also have a track record of reverting vandalism. jolielover♥talk 06:54, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

• Quxyz (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

While I do not usually seek out new or pending changes, I do occasionally bumble into them and I could relatively easily clear them when I find them. ✶Quxyz✶ 16:48, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

• Chicdat (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Former reviewer who voluntarily resigned after being topicbanned (unrelated to reviewing). The ban has now been lifted, so I'm re-requesting. 🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 17:36, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 07:15, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

• Gwanki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I request Pending Changes Reviewer rights to assist in reviewing edits. I have experience with editing and want to help maintain the quality of articles. Gwanki (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• 2601AC47 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

My next logical request for permission, one that I don't suppose I can utilize alongside Ultraviolet to stop the bad faith one-timers and vandals where I watch. Although, I must admit, I should simultaneously take care to not get into any content dispute I see; I'll do my best not to get into one this way. Thanks for considering (again). 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

P.S.: as a sure guarantee my use of rollback is done safely and without causing any significant issue, I'll use Mr. Stradivarius' ConfirmRollback. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:45, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

2601AC47, a confirmation click before rollback has become a feature that doesn't need userscripts anymore. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:08, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

• SparklingBlueMoon (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I would like to be able to access rollback tools to fight vandalism more effectively, I am familiar with Wikipedia's rules. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• XRozuRozu (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello! I had been actively patrolling RC in 2023 but paused for a long time since I was too busy. I plan to resume soon and would like rollback rights to make it easier. However, I mostly edit on my school computer so I am unable to use any tools such as Huggle, RedWarn, etc. Thank you for considering my request.

Note from 07:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC): I had just been informed that RedWarn can be used on a school computer, so it's very likely that I will be using it. xRozuRozu • ^tea_cups 23:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:35, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• ZyphorianNexus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have been reverting vandalism by undoing edits, warning users, and monitoring several pages to keep them protected. Rollback rights would make my efforts faster and more efficient. I am familiar with WP:VANDAL. ZyphorianNexus (talk) 07:15, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:49, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• PersonAccount (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have been reverting vandalism since I created my account. Although it appears I am a new user, I also have experience editing Wikipedia and reverting vandalism as an IP for many years (which I will not be disclosing due to security concerns). The rollback right will help me revert vandalism faster, which is why I am requesting it. PersonAccount 🐉 (talk) 20:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

PersonAccount, to be honest, no, it doesn't appear you are a new user. Which is okay if all previous activity was without having an account and without disruption. It will take longer than for other users until the trust for manually granting permissions is there in your case. It isn't yet, to me. Unless someone else grants rollback in the next week or so, I'll decline this with a recommendation not to ask for permissions until your account is a year old. Regarding rollback in particular, Twinkle and Ultraviolet will do just fine. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

• Jayhawker6 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I am finally starting to have a WP:CLUE, though I still deserve a good whack to the face with some WP:TROUT more often than I would like. While redwarn/UV is nice, it is not very fast to load diffs in the browser the way that I do at the moment (it is surprisingly resource intensive), and I think Huggle would help quite a bit along with reducing mistakes made as diffs would be clearer with less lag and more efficient resource usage. I have made mistakes, and will continue to make mistakes, but I find myself leaving more and more diffs untouched now that I realize more often when I don't have a WP:CLUE. Any advice is welcome, and advice on if I should still be using RedWarn or if there is some reason I should switch to UV would be welcome as well.  ${\displaystyle Jayhawker6}$【💬】 04:16, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• RachelTensions (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Being able to mass-rollback would've come in handy the last few days when dealing with cleaning up after an editor who had made a mess with adding copyvio images across a large number of articles (on multiple occasions). It was suggested that I requesting the rights for handling it easier in future. RachelTensions (talk) 05:54, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done charlotte ^👸🎄 06:38, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

• Jolielover (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Reason for requesting rollback rights: I'm quite active in the Recent Changes, and having the rollback feature would make reverting vandalism easier and quicker. jolielover♥talk 07:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:31, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• Ampil (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello I'm Ampil. I'm fighting vandalism again, and I'm quite active in the Recent Changes. I use AntiVandal tools like AntiVandal and Ultraviolet. After Fastily retired on November 19, 2024, I have more than 200 vandalism reverts in the last 4 months, and I meet all minimum requirements. The rollback rights would make it easier. declined requests:

1. [3] The account age 2 weeks.
2. [4] ~2 weeks last declined. You need wait 1 month.
3. [5] Please see 3rd, decline reason.

Thanks. ~🌀 Ampil ^{「💬 / 📝」} 08:26, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello Ampil, you're applying to review others' contributions to an English encyclopedia. Please provide a request without significant grammatical errors. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

@ToBeFree: I fixed all significant grammatical errors. ~🌀 Ampil ^{「💬 / 📝」} 03:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Ivebeenhacked kindly did so on your request. Also, "I'm quite active in the Recent Changes" seems to have been copied from the request above yours. I find Rosguill's granting of the new page reviewer permission highly optimistic, looking at the page deletion of a good article review because The reviewer's messages are not close to comprehendible. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:43, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

n.b. that was a trial run conferral, although if I'd seen the GAR deleted by Liz I would have declined for the same reasons. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:19, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:44, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• Vikingsam (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I want to become a rollback user on Wikipedia because I’m passionate about maintaining the integrity and quality of Wikipedia. With rollback rights, I’d be able to efficiently revert unconstructive edits and help uphold the standards of this incredible collaborative project. My goal is to contribute positively to the community while supporting Wikipedia’s mission to provide free knowledge to the world. Vikingsam (talk) 13:42, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello Vikingsam, you have never used "Undo" on a single contribution yet. Please have a look at "2." in the blue box at the top of this page. You may like to try Twinkle. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:21, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:22, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

• Abike25 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I am requesting for a Rollback right in other to help curb and prevent vandalism in English Wikipedia articles Abike25 (talk) 22:59, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

• Cyrobyte (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I monitor Special:RecentChanges and revert vandalism and having rollback rights would assist me in removing vandalism. Thank you. Cyrobyte (talk) 02:17, 18 December 2024 (UTC)