User talk:Bejakyo

Hello, Bejakyo. Thank you for your work on Outback (lesbian newsletter). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. IMO an edge case regarding wp:notability but I'm marking as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thank you very much for the review! Looking forward to being able to expand the article

Bejakyo (talk) 23:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Union of Agricultural and Allied Workers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labour Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:43, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry Plumb, Baron Plumb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Butler.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In your 21:15, 3 September edit summary you wrote "The National is a Scottish publication, not a UAE publication". Clicking Contact Us in the menu at the foot of https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/uk/2024/07/05/jeremy-corbyn-re-elected-chants-of-free-palestine-as-former-leader-beats-labour/ leads to "The National is copyrighted and trademarked by The National FZ LLC. Its postal address is PO Box 769555, Abu Dhabi. The National headquarters is temporarily located at Yas Creative Hub, Tower 2, Entrance 8, Abu Dhabi, UAE.." on https://www.thenationalnews.com/contact-us/. The paper you're referring to, from which https://www.thenational.scot/news/24556596.jeremy-corbyn-independent-mps-form-alliance-challenge-labour/ appears in another citation, is a completely different paper, which is why there are National (Abu Dhabi) and The National (Scotland). The National indicates at least two other papers with the same title. Mcljlm (talk) 05:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

well that is surprising, I hadn't expected a paper from the UAE to pay much mind to domestic UK politics. thank you for the correction Bejakyo (talk) 14:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Camel Trail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Launceston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adnan Hussain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free Palestine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bejakyo. Thank you for your work on Mid Cornwall Metro. Another editor, Cremastra, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Happy to mark this as reviewed. Thanks for writing about transport.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Cremastra}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cremastra — talk — c 19:55, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LoomCreek has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

LoomCreek (talk) 21:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at November 2024 Amsterdam attacks shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Andre🚐 08:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already got a small notification from a fellow contributor, but thanks for the more extensive heads up regardless. The other person involved in revert-waring has taken things to the talk page (as requested in the edit summery, and then by ping on the talk page) so I'm happy to leave the mainspace page as is regarding this issue so that discussion can take place in the talk page.

Also for future ould it be correct to assume that the 1-revert rule (mentioned bellow) trumps the three-revert rule on a page under activeArb? thank Bejakyo (talk) 08:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this page is under 1RR, not 3RR. But it seems that this is the first time anyone is informing or warning you of this, but now you know about it. You are welcome for the heads-up. Andre🚐 08:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Andre🚐 08:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 November United Kingdom farmers' protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labour Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Transgender health care misinformation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trans people.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]