User talk:Cyrius

Archives:

• User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2004/1/
• User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2004/2/
• User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2004/3/
• User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2004/4/
• User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2005/1/
• User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2005/2/
• User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2007/1/
• User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2007/2/

Thanks for deleting my picture. It was only for my userpage. I hope deleting it brightened your day. - Serious Cat 08:38, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Galveston Hurricane of 1900 has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.--Nilfanion (talk) 23:33, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just ran across Category:Wikipedia administrators open to recall. Were you aware of this? I think it's neat, but i'm not an admin, so i figured i'd pass it along to the only admin i know. Foobaz·o< 18:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I recently passed 3000 edits. :-)

I keep forgetting to tell you on IRC,so I'll tell you here; I love your /quit message. :D IceKarmaॐ 04:09, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pending deletion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Marlith ^T/C 05:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with clause (4) of the Arbitration Filing Procedure, you are hereby being notified that you have been mentioned as a contributing party to the article and you can make a statement.

You can find the claim, and make your statement here.

I am required to tell you this information I am the filing party for the arbitration claim.

Andrew81446 (talk) 06:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Berlin Wine Tastings, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berlin Wine Tastings. Thank you. Nunquam Dormio (talk) 11:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the info, that should be sufficient. Cirt (talk) 20:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to add some documentation to explain the distinction between "memory" and "storage" - and update the example to use "storage", as the phone in question is running Windows Mobile and thus arguably "computery". (For extra credit, appropriately update other pages using that template. :-)) Guy Harris (talk) 23:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For your help in creating Wikipedia:WikiProject Texas, I award you the first Texas Barnstar: Paxsimius (talk) 03:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Homestar Runner logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but someone else made it anyway. I think outright deletion is kind of harsh simply because someone pasted part of it from an article. All I did was dig the page out of the google cache from the last time you guys deleted it. Knowledge will be free, rules or no rules. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onsen (talk • contribs) 16:14, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

YOUR USERPAGE WAS BELOW THE MINIMUM KAT QUOTA, BUT I HAZ FIXED IT FOR YOU. Ceiling Cat (talk) 21:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Kick the ass of anyone who renominates GNAA for deletion before 2007, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Kick the ass of anyone who renominates GNAA for deletion before 2007 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Kick the ass of anyone who renominates GNAA for deletion before 2007 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. VG ☎ 15:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC) VG ☎ 15:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated 2004 Atlantic hurricane season for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. –Juliancolton ^{Happy Holidays} 01:26, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brazil hurricane.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Brazil hurricane 2004-03-26.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Brazil hurricane 2004-03-26.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated List of animals that explode (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you.  – iridescent 08:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:Pending deletions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Ciphers (talk) 08:12, 4 October 2009 (UTC) -->[reply]

sure! I had better check the history of the page. thanks for your comment, and sorry for inconvenience. best --Ciphers (talk) 06:10, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the talk article (Talk:USPS).

Jfiander (talk) 01:51, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem! —  Cargoking  talk  08:51, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hello sir,from last 2 months an administrator spaceman spiff is blocking my account,whenever i make any new account she block it.sheis using his rights in a wrong way.i was simply edited indian epic article first.she blocked me because she cannot see improved indian epic articles.she made a trick that she blocked my 1 account and after it whenever i made any new account she blocked it for sockpupettry.she now doesn'tallow me to talk on discussion page,this is not fair we all give donation to wikipedia not for giving admin priviledge s to user like spaceman,wikipedia is for all not for her only —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.240.111.235 (talk) 10:24, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete User talk:Tbsdy lives. User talk pages are not speedy deleted, if deletion is desired, MfD is the place to go, and even then policy is generally against deletion. DuncanHill (talk) 21:52, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CSD criteria U1, which you gave as the criterion for deletion, specifically excludes user talk pages. "U1. User request. Personal user pages and subpages (but not user talk pages) upon request by their user. In some rare cases there may be administrative need to retain the page. In exceptional cases user talk pages may be deleted via Miscellany for Deletion (see right to vanish); they are not eligible for speedy deletion under this criterion." DuncanHill (talk) 21:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I've done this per WP:DELTALK. Tbsdy should feel free to email Oversight if there is anything in particular he wants redacted. –xeno^talk 21:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks Xeno. Tbsdy was already aware that user talk pages are not speedied, as it was raised as an issue when he reclaimed his admin tools. DuncanHill (talk) 21:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see any reason to try to make him stick around in order to attempt to have his stuff deleted. He just wants to go away. Keeping his talk page serves little purpose except to aggravate him and cause more bad feelings. -- Cyrius|✎ 22:07, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cyrius! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 03:53, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you check in anytime soon, could you review this unblock from a block you made over three years ago? The user says he's grown up and has some specific areas where he wants to contribute. Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see he's explained this. I also have no problem with that ... it can be seen in the future that he had a shaky start, which will help deter vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 15:22, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:PD USGov. Since you had some involvement with the Template:PD USGov redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:06, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of LNG terminals, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Mifter (talk) 23:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Cyrius,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 14:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited

Date Saturday, December 8, 2012 Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104 Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand. Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki. Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration. Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 04:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Cyrius,

I apologize for the inconvenience, but have no other way than appealing for administrators’ help recover a deleted article.

I published a film article entitled Drits (Derivas), a film by Portuguese director Ricardo Costa. It is the second film from an autobiographic trilogy, Faraways. The article was kept untouched by several months. To my surprise, it was recently eliminated and redirected to the director’s page with no discussion. I undid the redirection, but saw the article was proposed to deletion. Reason: independent, verifiable, secondary resources. I argued that the article couldn’t have but primary sources (the producer’s ones) as it is an upcoming film, like many others listed at upcoming films. A film that has not yet been premiered or distributed may not be commented. Besides, none of the films so listed has ever been deleted or even contested.

At last, in discussion, user User:reddogsix proposed that the article should be renamed to Drifts (film) or similar, and at the same time put at the disambiguation page of Dritf this reference «Drifs, unreleased film by Ricardo Costa (filmmaker). I created a new page for the same article entitled Drifts (Portuguese film). As the semantic root “drift” seemed to be the problem, I replaced the article name to Derivas (Drifts) and published it once more with some improvements. As a result, the article was fast deleted and I blocked for three days.

In the meantime, a new article about the trilogy was published: Faraways, which was proposed to fast deletion as well by the same user, User:reddogsix.

Although unreleased, although having no reliable secondary sources, Drifts is unquestionably an outstanding film for its uniqueness and characteristics: autobiography, comedy, docufiction, metafiction in one. I guess that “outstanding” may be a synonym for “notable” in such cases and that articles like this shouldn’t be deleted without previous cared analyses: important information may be lost.

This sequence of interventions is clearly a personal attack by User:reddogsix, supported by two or three user friend. It has no other explanation. It contributes in nothing to improve articles quality. Mists article, which I created on 10 September 2010, is the latest example. The article structure was unreasonably modified, loosing clarity and useful content.

NOTE: sent to 30 administrators.

Thanks for your attention, User:Tertulius 21:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chemical and Biological Warfare. Since you had some involvement with the Chemical and Biological Warfare redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Cyrius, thanks for creating National Cathedral!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This page appears to be a machine translation (google translate) of the Russian version. The resulting translation is at times incomprehensible.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mduvekot (talk) 15:00, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hurricane Hermine. Since you had some involvement with the Hurricane Hermine redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 19:37, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cyrius.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Newyork. Since you had some involvement with the Newyork redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 21:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Futurama - The Future.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

The file File:Nohat-logo-X-en-darkbg.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Old orphaned esoteric file.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:44, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:46, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nicobium. Since you had some involvement with the Nicobium redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Apcolypse. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 9#Apcolypse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Not a very active user (talk) 17:25, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mac OS is up for renaming, please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 October 28#Category:Mac OS software. – Fayenatic London 15:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Emordnilap and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 8#Emordnilap until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:57, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. You deleted this page as a copyright violation just as I was about to decline the nomination. The draft was identified as being copied from https://legiscan.com/US/bill/SB4674/2021, but I suspect that the material on that LegiScan page originally came from https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/4674, which is in the public domain. What do you think? - Eureka Lott 00:12, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your suspicion appears to be correct, undeleted. Cyrius|✎ 00:48, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cyrius, thanks for taking care of this CSD. Did you notice the salt request I added? The page is being continuously created in error by new WikiEd editors. ––FormalDude (talk) 03:20, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cyrius,

You have certainly returned to working as an admin with gusto, you are very busy deleting pages tagged for speedy deletion. I just encourage you to carefully review the tagged pages and make sure the taggings are appropriate. I probably untag at least 1 out of 10 CSD-tagged pages I come across because the criteria doesn't apply. There is an editor who is tagging pages over the past hour who is clearly mixed up on what qualifies as a speedy deletion criteria such as tagging drafts based on notability or tagging drafts as deletable because they are in a foreign language, neither of which is a valid reason for speedy deletion. Although you have clearly been an admin for a long time, I encourage you to slow down and evaluate all of the pages you anticipate deleting and make sure that the tagging editor has posted a notice on the talk page of the page creator letting them know that the page will likely be deleted. This is particularly important for speedy deletion because there is no review process other than the admin who is considering deleting the page. As long as it is not an attack page or BLP violation, there is no rush to delete a page that is tagged for speedy deletion, you can spend a minute or two considering them.

I hope you take this in the spirit intended which was to be helpful to an admin who is returning to active service. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:35, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for killing my typo :)

Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 22:10, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll explain the chain of events there. I happened to land at that page under the title "Kung fu kid". I saw that all the instances of the title were title-case, so my intent was to move the page to "Kung Fu Kid", without noticing that there was a video game with the same name as primary topic. Somehow I managed to move it to Kung Fu Did, which you deleted.

Because of this I want to apologize and also  Self-trout. Oh, well! Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 04:03, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you speedy deleted the page which I've re-created using new reliable sources where it passes WP:MUSICBIO and was alrey reviewed. Do you've any comment to pass regarding the speedy deletion of an article which was previously deleted before more than a year. DIVINE (talk) 15:41, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I moved the page from Anjali Phougat to Anjali Phougat Dhingra because her name is Anjali Phougat Dhingra as mentioned in multiple secondary and independent reliable news source. Draft:Anjali Phougat Hukumat Namanzoor (talk) 08:53, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You moved it from Draft space to Article space when the original had been deleted for notability concerns. That made the page eligible for speedy deletion.

And even if you hadn't done that, you "moved" the article by copying and pasting the draft and blanking the original. For future page moves, please follow the instructions at Help:How to move a page. It's easier to use the actual move function and importantly, the move function preserves page history. Page history is required to fulfill the attribution requirements of Wikipedia's licensing.

@Hukumat Namanzoor — Cyrius|✎ 15:43, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	Article deletion
	Hello, Why did you remove the following article called "Goleszów-Wisła Głębce Line" article? GrandContimentalRailways (talk) 18:23, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article was moved to Draft:Goleszów-Wisła Głębce Line. I merely deleted the cross-namespace redirect, as per policy. @GrandContimentalRailways — Cyrius|✎ 18:30, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thank you. GrandContimentalRailways (talk) 07:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a very big misunderstanding about my draft article. I can further explain anything about it if you want, it is completely valid in it's information. I also didn't mean to use it as a test page, I published the words (testing) to check if I could preview the page. Thanks, regards Theodore. MangrovianMite (talk) 03:36, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm mainly active in Hebrew Wikipedia' and I'm new here. Where do I find the policy? Eitanbb (talk) 21:48, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete تراجم شعراء السودان. I can't figure out where it pointed, but as a general rule being in a foreign language is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. If the foreign language does not have an affinity to the subject, then sometimes it's a valid reason for deletion at RFD, but that sort of thing should be discussed first since RfD regulars' definitions of "affinity" vary widely.

(I asked the first admin to delete the page the same request, and then they complied, followed by you deleting it seven minutes later) * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:31, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. This one stumped me for a bit. But then I realized that the article's subject is also the holder of the external website is also the person who wrote this article. The website has been altered since I ran the initial copyvios report. I've actually never run across this before. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:02, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shockingly, I ran into that situation on another page yesterday. That case was even more flagrant than the one paragraph here.

And of course as I was looking into this someone else nuked it for self-promotion. Which I was tempted to do the first time around but didn't. @Onel5969 – Cyrius|✎ 22:48, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now deleted by User:Seraphimblade. VickKiang (talk) 23:40, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cyrius. Perhaps you could help answer WP:THQ#Creating a new article since your the admin who deleted Draft:Sai Madhukar? The OP seems confused as to why the draft was deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:12, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for commenting. — Marchjuly (talk) 20:38, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have deleted Draft:Tayzee under speedy deletion criterion G7 (creator of the page has requested deletion or blanked the page). However, the account which blanked the page was not the one which created it. JBW (talk) 23:24, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think I got hung up on the person adding the tag not being the blanker and didn't look that hard at the very first edits so the red text just blurred together. Just another thing to be careful about. @JBW — Cyrius|✎ 00:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, what's happening Cyrius. I noticed that you deleted my redirects for 109 countries and 110 countries under the guise of them being "Recently created, implausible redirect[s]." However, these are both terms that are commonly used as a dogwhistle by anti-semites when referring to how the Jews were expelled. This IMHO is not an implausible redirect, but one that will help confused readers when they encounter these dogwhistsles. Knightoftheswords281 (talk) 19:59, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone who's confused by those terms and looking for an explanation will just be more confused by being pointed at an article about Jewish history. One that doesn't explain why they've been redirected there.

I know I was initially confused because I was not aware of those dogwhistles.

The best redirect target I can think of that would actually be informative is List of symbols designated by the Anti-Defamation League as hate symbols#Numerical, and even that's not great. @Knightoftheswords281 — Cyrius|✎ 22:39, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for dealing with the copyvio on B.C. Home Owner Mortgage and Equity partnership! :D ~ Eejit43 (talk) 22:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete "2022 post-Roe cause-célèbre"? --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the deletion reason was clear enough. It was tagged as an implausible redirect. The reason seemed sound enough to me. Nobody looking for the article is going to be searching for a relatively uncommon French loan term.

And that's without wading into the drama of the now-blocked user who suggested that title to "put some panache on it" in the first place. @Jax 0677 — Cyrius|✎ 21:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrius, Hello WikiEditor1234567123 — Blocked forgery of information, conducting edit wars. The author of the article is a vandal. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dzurdzuketi Товболатов (talk) 21:40, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please guide me on where I went wrong with this article. As I am new here and didnt post it, for the reason mentioned by the deleter Marvinks.wellsltd (talk) 11:53, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete the Cabildo de Cartagena de Indias article if after I summarized it?, just leave the date of the article, I demand that you return the article, what you did was because you wanted it because it no longer had a copyright vio. This was very ugly and you only did it because you don't like my additions on wikipedia. I want to know how I could file a complaint so that the other administrators can see it.--BrugesFR (talk) 16:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the complaint I made about the deletion of Cabildo of Cartagena article on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard--BrugesFR (talk) 17:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am Nilesh Kumar. From India, I want my bio on Wikipedia. I am the owner of a website Called TheMoviesz.com. With 4 million+ hits, how can I add myself to Wikipedia ? Nileh65 (talk) 08:56, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

signed, 64andtim (chat) 22:28, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:34, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:09, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Meroka CIWS, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turret. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Eh Steve has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 27 § Eh Steve until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]