Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Baker (rugby union)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kathy Baker (rugby union)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG (talk) 00:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Rugby union, and Ireland. JTtheOG (talk) 00:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks to be a WP:GNG fail. While there is some coverage, I'm not sure it's enough to suggest a GNG pass. May well be a case of WP:TOOSOON, however I wouldn't recommend drafting as I'm not sure she'll garner enough coverage for a GNG pass in the next 6 months. No suitable redirect either per WP:ATD. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:11, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the coverage just seems to be brief passing mentions rather than anyone writing about her at length Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:09, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The best coverage I've found ([1]) is still too short. Deckkohl (talk) 11:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.