Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keychain Logistics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:12, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keychain Logistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches are noticeably finding nothing but published and republished PR and that's exactly what this article, its information, sources and history confirm in this hence WP:NOT applies; there's no compromises when it's clear Wikipedia was misused as an advertising webhost. When an article so blatantly focuses with overblown advertising and yet its sources are themselves, that's self-explanatory. We explicitly stated in our first policies that we would never accept advertising, there's nothing to suggest we should accept them now. SwisterTwister talk 22:21, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:43, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 00:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Repackaged PR and bare listings are only apparent sources at this time. YCombinator itself is notable, but that notability is not automatically inherited by its incubatees. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:32, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Probably WP:TOOSOON. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 20:35, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.