Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggie Ausburn (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:53, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Maggie Ausburn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Won a season of Big Brother in 2005 and nothing since then; is winning one reality series two decades ago sufficient to establish notability? Bgsu98 (talk) 01:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bgsu98 (talk) 01:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete not even close to enough sourcing to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:37, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.