Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherilyn Reyes-Tan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. T. Canens (talk) 11:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sherilyn Reyes-Tan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally prodded due to lack of citations and notability. Citations have since been added, but still not enough to meet notability standards. Was deprodded with the following rationale: "remove PROD, while the original author has not contested the deletion, I take it that they think the article is worth saving with the amount of work they put in since the PROD, also part of the PROD reason is now inaccurate." Only a single reference is from a RS, and that one is from 10 years ago. Searches did not turn up enough to show she passes WP:GNG, a few trivial mentions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I found some articles about her on Philippine entertainment websites such as PEP. Do those count as reliable sources or at the very least significant coverage? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a complete copy of this article at Draft:Sherilyn Reyes-Tan (actress) that needs to be addressed when this is closed. - GB fan 00:23, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Famousbirthdays.com, the only English reference, use prominently throughout the article, is not are reliable source (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). --Ronz (talk) 02:00, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.