Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 23
February 25 >

February 24

[edit]

Category:Japanese diaspora in Latin America

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 11:58, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: At present it is not helpful for navigation with only one page in it. Upmerge for now Mason (talk) 22:19, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Court painters of the Kingdom of Sardinia

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: dual merge to Category:Court painters and Category:People from the Kingdom of Sardinia. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:30, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only person in here isn't mentioned as being a "Court painter", if kept, I think the category should be renamed to painters from the Kingdom of Sardinia Mason (talk) 21:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ancient art on Alexander the Great

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Alexander the Great in art. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename to march the style of Art depicting people. I've broadened the category to not focus on the era of creation of the art, but I don't feel strongly about it. Mason (talk) 21:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also fine with that. Johnbod (talk) 18:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Australian indigenous rights activists

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 3#Category:Australian indigenous rights activists

Category:Armoured cars of the United States

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: MOS:TIES. The United States produces armored cars, not armoured ones. None of the pages in the category use the British spelling. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 20:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional female businesspeople

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Fictional businesspeople. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 11:59, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Fictional female businesspeople to Category:Fictional businesswomen
Nominator's rationale: Last time, this discussion ended without a clear consensus. I still think that this proposed new page name would be both shorter and also consistent with its real-life counterpart Category:Businesswomen.
Also, to address the bizarre semantic argument that "women = female humans"; while that might be true for real life, in the realm of speculative fiction being a "man" or "woman" doesn't necessarily mean that you're human; non-human humanoid characters are often treated as "people" like humans are. Fictional women can be female aliens, angels, demons, fairies, goddesses, monsters, vampires, etc. AHI-3000 (talk) 04:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the category was only tagged yesterday, relisting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Assassinated journalists

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 3#Category:Assassinated journalists

Category:Z Holdings

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 3#Category:Z Holdings

Category:Scachs d'amor

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:33, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: this category is unhelpful for navigation. It contains only the poem AND the people who wrote the poem Mason (talk) 19:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Kings of the Neo-Elamite Period

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:33, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unhelpful for navigation. There's no Category:Neo-Elamite Period category. Mason (talk) 19:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:33, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining and unhelpful for navigation Mason (talk) 19:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge as nominated. No prejudice against nominating any of the merge targets for renaming. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge. Overcategorization, there's really no need for this much diffusion. Mason (talk) 19:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom Small categories with little to no scope for expansion. Dimadick (talk) 18:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:University of Melbourne alumni sportspeople

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:35, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining intersection Mason (talk) 19:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Executed journalists

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:35, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. This category only has one person in it. (Please populate categories with more than one person.) Mason (talk) 19:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:University of Melbourne women

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: manually merge where applicable. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 12:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not a notable intersection - as far as I can tell, there is no other university for which we have an "X University women" category. StAnselm (talk) 17:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support in principle, but we should check to confirm that folks are all in University of Melbourne people categories. Mason (talk) 21:58, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They should be - either as alumni or staff. I clicked on Gillian Armstrong somewhat randomly, and she wasn't in any other University of Melbourne category, but in fact there was nothing in the article supporting a connection with the university. StAnselm (talk) 22:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for consistency. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I created this category - it was part of an event where women wiki editors got together and wrote articles about significant women to address the gender imbalance, as there are a lot more articles about men and than women on Wikipedia...so it would be poetic if male editors removed it! The category highlights those women from Melb uni who have gone on to achieve things. I think being a woman is notable, in the context of gender studies and history. Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:07, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: I think it is worth pointing out that I am a female wikipedian. @Deathlibrarian, if you're going to point out gender imbalances, it's good to not make assumptions. I think that this category does not meet the criteria for defining under EGRS. It may be interesting for a list, but this is not how categories work. Mason (talk) 00:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I do appreciate that information, but gender of the *nominator* aside, about 90% of Wiki editors are in fact men (including me), so it's likely it will be men voting to remove it... which is my point. However, if it's strictly against the rules for establishing categories, so be it. Personally I think it's a positive, helpful category that can help the user.Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • This need a manual merger. It is not clear whether the category covers staff members, alumni, patrons of the university, etc. Dimadick (talk) 18:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Jewellery collectors

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining. Most of these people are just wealthy art collectors Mason (talk) 16:19, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Quotation collectors

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Compilers of works of quotations. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:25, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining Mason (talk) 16:16, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Irish Queen's Counsel

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2C NSH001 (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't this be redirected, instead? Mason (talk) 16:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No - see the head cat. Many in fact only were KC; we just move the whole tree when QCs become KCs, very sensibly. Johnbod (talk) 20:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Works by date

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 2#Category:Works by date

Category:Kings of the Kingdom of Ireland

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:24, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I've never seen any source categorize English monarchs this way. They are all already in Category:16th-century Irish monarchs or Category:17th-century Irish monarchs, etc. Some of them are queens not kings. Over-categorization. DrKay (talk) 11:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yup - even Lady Jane Grey is in there. Johnbod (talk) 20:24, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Indian Prime Minister speeches

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:21, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. The subcategory is already in Category:Speeches by politicians so a merge is not needed. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom Mason (talk) 00:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Speeches in the Parliament of South Africa

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:21, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:OVERLAPCAT, all articles are already in Category:South Africa presidential speeches. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
support per nom Mason (talk) 16:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:20th-century Dutch anatomists

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's no need to diffuse anatomists by nationality and century. If kept, then I think we should rename the categories to X-century anatomists Mason (talk) 04:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:16th-century German chemists

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one person in each category, which isn't helpful for navigation. Mason (talk) 04:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Vietnamese-language newspapers published in Texas

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:21, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one newspaper in here, which isn't helpful for navigation Mason (talk) 04:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: I think there used to be a few more articles in this category, but since that's no longer the case, merging seems reasonable to me. The lone remaining article has already just been added to one parent category, Category:Vietnamese-language media in Texas. Minh Nguyễn 💬 04:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Yale Bulldogs rugby

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Yale Bulldogs. Discussion of the categorization of Yale Rugby can take place at Talk:Yale Rugby. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:28, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one page in category. Let'srun (talk) 04:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rollins Tars baseball seasons

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:21, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category lacks subjects. Upmerge to Rollins Tars baseball. Let'srun (talk) 03:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:History of medicine in Iran

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one page in here, which isn't helpful for navigation Mason (talk) 02:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Flint (rock)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 2#Category:Flint (rock)

Category:Internet Archive collectors

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Digital archivists. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Based on the contents, there are all people connected with the internet archive. They're not really collectors... Mason (talk) 00:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Collectors of Shaker artifacts

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining (and small category). The two people in here, are both currators, hence the merge target Mason (talk) 00:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Handbag collectors

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining category for any of the three people in here. Mason (talk) 00:11, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Electrosurgery

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Only two pages in here, the technique and the guy who invented the technique. Mason (talk) 00:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional pediatric surgeons

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Dual upmerge. There's only one page in here, which is really not enough to support a category at the intersection of two specializations. Mason (talk) 00:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional cardiothoracic surgeons

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Fictional cardiac surgeons. No prejudice against speedy renomination for merging. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category:cardiothoracic surgeons doesn't exist as a category. And for the most part, these fictional surgeons are thought of a heart surgeons. I'm also ok with just merging to fictional surgeons. Mason (talk) 00:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_24&oldid=1214439529"