User contributions for 212.194.114.50

13:4813:48, 29 August 2017 diff hist −196 Thermal lance Not a thermal lance, just has the same name. Removed as irrelevant.

13:3613:36, 17 July 2017 diff hist −75 Northrop B-2 Spirit →Radar: Removed "invisible to radar" comment. Stealth is not "invisibility" as is born out in all relevant reference material.

14:3214:32, 13 July 2017 diff hist −14 Lost-wax casting →Textile use: Changed "Leningrad" to "Saint Petersburg", because its name was changed in *cough* 1991...

13:4213:42, 27 June 2017 diff hist +789 Talk:Chelation therapy →Is chelation commonly used for horses or other animals? Any research on animals?
09:4809:48, 27 June 2017 diff hist −43 Future Cruise/Anti-Ship Weapon Removed uncited reference to "continuous wave detonation engine". As this is an emerging technology, strong reference must be made if it is to be quoted as present.

16:3516:35, 3 February 2017 diff hist −62 Calcium nitrite Removed a reference to anti-oxidant, as is stated in the source, and as is known in the chemical industry, Calcium Nitrite is an oxidising agent.
16:3216:32, 3 February 2017 diff hist −1 Calcium nitrite Corrected "reductant" to "oxidiser" (they are opposites) as stated in the reference.

09:4509:45, 22 December 2016 diff hist +634 Hsiung Feng III Undid revision 756030516 by 103.27.222.158 (talk) You want me to stop doing this, then show yourself and your reasoning in the talk page.

08:5008:50, 20 December 2016 diff hist +634 Hsiung Feng III Undid revision 755315228 by 27.100.20.133 (talk) If you have official confirmation of so-called "undeclared" warheads, feel free to add a *credible* reference.

14:3814:38, 16 December 2016 diff hist −51 Hsiung Feng III Taiwan has no nuclear weapons at this time: "The Republic of China (Taiwan) denies having any weapons of mass destruction. There is no evidence of Taiwan possessing any chemical or nuclear weapons though it has pursued nuclear weapons in the past."
14:2214:22, 16 December 2016 diff hist +685 Hsiung Feng III Undid revision 755019720 by 27.100.20.96 (talk) I gave reason and discussion for my edits, if they are reverted without a word, I will un-revert them.
09:4409:44, 16 December 2016 diff hist −19 Criticality accident →Blue glow: Correction to the explanation of Cerenkov radiation.

14:0514:05, 13 December 2016 diff hist −120 Hypersonic speed →See also: Its not hypersonic and its not nuclear.
09:3609:36, 13 December 2016 diff hist −354 Hsiung Feng III Undid revision 754456272 by 45.120.201.154 (talk) Please dont undo without at least making a note as to why in the talk page. Tag: references removed

11:4311:43, 12 December 2016 diff hist +1,062 Talk:Hsiung Feng III →Jeez
11:3611:36, 12 December 2016 diff hist −221 Hsiung Feng III Removed another reference to Mach 10+ flight. removed reference to possible 15000km range. These are fantasy figures made up by a journalist. 15000km is further than some ICBMs... might as well have said "warp 10 capable" Tag: references removed
11:2511:25, 12 December 2016 diff hist +2 Talk:Hsiung Feng III No edit summary
11:2411:24, 12 December 2016 diff hist +1,929 Talk:Hsiung Feng III →Jeez
11:1311:13, 12 December 2016 diff hist −133 Hsiung Feng III Undid revision 753305190 by 43.249.128.118 (talk) "The Sun" is not a credible source.

17:1617:16, 5 December 2016 diff hist −133 Hsiung Feng III Removed all reference to "hypersonic" as there is no support, and no technological precedent either (Ramjets only effective up to ~M.5ish, no faster airbreathing alternative as of 2016)