This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult
I can't help wondering if the writer or writers of this article have actually read Mather's sermon. The sermon is relatively short, but it seems that it may have been too long to hold their attention.
Mather falls under the opprobrium of modern critics because he dares to believe in the existence of Satan and demons. Of course, such a belief was basic orthodoxy until the Enlightenment, after which it passed from public consciousness into the realm of superstition and bigotry. But if the Devil exists (a matter that untold thousands of devout and undevout writers throughout the Christian Era have agreed upon), then it is neither impossible nor ridiculous to credit evidence of Satan's "breaking out" upon the poor people of Essex County in the early 1690s. This is Mather's assumption - a presupposition, and one he must have shared with most of his readers, even the ones critical or envious of him. This is not his thesis, however. Yet the writer or writers seem to think that this is the burden of Mather's sermon. Their implied condemnation of Mather for believing in Satan is anachronistic. Indeed, it would have been remarkable in New England or old England for anyone to assert that Satan does not exist - and only a very few did.
The authors, however, miss Mather's main points. Mather asserts that, whatever the truth about Salem, evidence and fear of demon possession is a sign of the judgment of God upon New England. Instead of advocating what we have called "witch hunts," Mather counsels prayer and confession by all men. While he seems to accept at least some eyewitness accounts of levitation and demonic activities (as well as the confessions of several who claimed to have done these things), Mather warns most soberly against false convictions in the cases before the judges. "What shall be done to those," he asks, who have not confessed and against whom the only evidence of guilt is spectral ("evidence...founded in the dark world")? He counsels prayer, fasting, and humility. "Here they do solemnly demand our addresses to the Father of Lights on their behalf....[W]e are even ready to be sinfully, yea, hotly and madly, mauling one another, in the dark." These are not the ravings of a sex-crazed, Bible-thumping lunatic. This is careful and sober counsel to pull back from the edge. It is as close to an outright call to withhold judgment as a leader in the colony made at the time. Yet Mather is condemned as the instigator and prime mover in the affair.
The armchair psychoanalysists who have penned this entry work from a presupposition diametrically opposed to Mather's. They may not know much, but they know that the devil does not exist; ergo, witchcraft is impossible, and any conviction for practicing witchcraft, no matter how credible the evidence or confession, is ipso facto unjust and superstitious.
Why not acknowledge this bigoted point of view in the article?