User talk:Lord Ruffy98

Hello, Lord Ruffy98. Thank you for your work on Tamina (dessert). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Needs more sources. I check...they exist. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very mouch, i'll add some sources as soon as possible Lord Ruffy98 (talk) 17:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lord Ruffy98, I came here having seen your Helpdesk query and had a look at the article. It was tagged as a Wikipedia:Orphan, which means that no other articles linked to it. I looked for Tamina dessert in Wikipedia and have added links at Algerian cuisine, Mawlid in Algeria and List of desserts. Hopefully that will make it easier for other readers to find your article. TSventon (talk) 20:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your help and work. Lord Ruffy98 (talk) 21:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have also created Tamina (disambiguation), but I expect that other editors will want to tidy it up. TSventon (talk) 22:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I wanted to modify the disambiguation page but it didn't let me do it. Thanks again! Lord Ruffy98 (talk) 22:22, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe is just me who don't know hot to modify it, i don't know. Lord Ruffy98 (talk) 22:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should be able to edit the page like any other page. Or tell me the problem here and I can try to fix it. TSventon (talk) 22:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Thanks you so much. Lord Ruffy98 (talk) 14:24, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Lord Ruffy98 , thanks to your important contributions in wikipedia on articles in North africa I would like to discuss with you important matters concerning your contribution. please find the time to email me when possible. Potymkin (talk) 16:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowman304 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

More citations needed; cleanup needed

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hermann Frahm and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowman304|talk 00:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lord Ruffy98! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Snowman304|talk 00:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 Ms. Olympia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTAL - dates haven't even been announced for next year's competition and there are no independent references. Incubate in draft space.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work and for keeping me informed. I knew the dates weren’t confirmed yet, but I thought creating the page could provide a useful preview. You’re absolutely right that moving it to the draft space was a better choice; thanks for taking care of that Lord Ruffy98 (talk) 18:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandre Dufour, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thilsebatti (talk) 13:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know but I wanted a second opinion. Thanks for the message! Lord Ruffy98 (talk) 14:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lord Ruffy98. Thank you for your work on Pierre Chappuis (physicist). Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I am OK with him as notable, but I don't think being nominated for a Nobel really demonstrates that. What does is the two awards which you need to mention in the text and the lead. You also need to find more sources, I have marked some. Note that the ancestory pdf is not considered a reliable source.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 15:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954: Thank you for your advice; I'll make the necessary modifications. Some of them I have already implemented. Lord Ruffy98 (talk) 23:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	You are invited to participate in WikiProject Berbers, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about Berbers.
	You may sign up at the project members page.

TahaKahi (talk) 21:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lord Ruffy98. Thank you for your work on Adriano Gozzini. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please be more specific about the awards, the phrase "numerous national and international awards" without sources or any verification should otherwise be removed. Please also do not add WP:Peacock terms

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 16:31, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954: Thank you for your review. I added sources for the awards and made them more explicit in the awards section. I also removed the phrase "numerous national and international awards," as it was too generic and not well-sourced.

Again, thank you for your advice. Lord Ruffy98 (talk) 18:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]