User talk:RealKnockout

Hello everyone! I am RealKnockout! You can talk to me here, so if you need to talk to me, make a new section. Thank you.

Hi RealKnockout I have recently noticed these 3 edits on Balochistan related articles [1][2] and [3] the user who made them is Wareon they have been going around adding large amounts of information from 1 political scientist Rafi Sheikh while modifying existing edits and adding his own commentary such as "according to Pakistani narrative" he values Rafi Sheikh views but as soon as a political scientist like Pervez Iqbal adds his view he calls it the Pakistani narrative.

This diff [[4] in particular shows the agenda they hold they have added paragraph after paragraph of text from Rafis book I was wondering is the use of one source and adding allot of content from it fall under UNDUE wiki rule? Surely the counter view should be added since Balochistan is the main article page I think that content should be merged with History of Balochistan article for example Hyderabad article which is state which was forcibly annexed by India has very little on its annexation but Indian editors descend upon Balochistan with swathes of text to push a certain narrative should his opinion (Rafi Sheikh) be given such huge weight considering other views are minimized and called "Pakistani narratives". TruthUnknown1 (talk) 16:19, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there @TruthUnknown1: I do think that it is strange that he gives this much weight to this book, which appears to be called The Genesis of Baloch Nationalism: Politics and Ethnicity in Pakistan, 1947–1977. Perhaps you should consider contacting him on his talk page rather than me and see what his explanation for this is. RealKnockout (talk) 16:49, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying RealKnockout|RealKnockout I know the reason Wareon is trying to push a one sided narrative mostly driven by his anti-Pakistani agenda he uses that one source to discredit Pakistan and unfortunately they are from India so its natural he will be trying to spread misinformation but notice how the article on Hyderabad in India hardly mentions how it became part of India and barely mentions how India militarily forced Hyderabad to be part of India while Balochistan contains several paragraphs of clearly one sided propaganda and he cherry picks one book to spread a certain narrative. TruthUnknown1 (talk) 21:31, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you contact Wareon and ask him to explain his reasoning before making any hasty conclusions. RealKnockout (talk) 22:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - just a good faith comment/observation on your nomination of this article. Do you have access to JSTOR? I was able to locate references to this event with about five minutes of searching on JSTOR. If you don't have access, I'd highly recommend it and one can get access with a Wikipedia library card. Just a thought. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 23:33, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do have a Wikipedia library card and therefore access to JSTOR. I will let the AfD run its course and see what people decide; Someone gave a good suggest about redirecting the page to History of Balochistan and making a section there. For now, I will simply wait and see. If it is kept, I will read through the sources; if there are enough I will expand the page, if not I will redirect it and make a section. Thanks a lot for letting me know. RealKnockout (talk) 22:48, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's more than enough material for an article and I only spent five minutes on JSTOR and five minutes on Google; I encourage you to make more use of your library card! :) Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 11:05, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article is clearly heavily influenced by undeclared paid editors. All the images are claimed to be donated by the foundation, and the text is clearly written by insiders eg The Foundation was conceived in a spirit of dedication and believes there can be no progress without education.. Many of the references are to sources connected to the foundation, and, as always with these COI projects we start with "Missions and values", but don't bother with real facts such as numbers of employees income or expenditure. Basically, it's a promo for what they claim to do with NPOV like The Foundation was conceived in a spirit of dedication and believes there can be no progress without education. TDF endeavours to undertake educational projects that are crucial for the advancement and prosperity of people... a cutting-edge and exemplary business school that equips students with indispensable knowledge and skills needed to thrive in the current and upcoming competitive era... It is very popular in the local community... I'll restore as a draft at Draft:Dawood Foundation so you can address the issues if you wish. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: I have removed the more blatant NPOV violations from the article. However, there are numerous sources which allow the article to pass GNG. Couldn't the article simply be moved back to articlespace with the {{NPOV language}} template? RealKnockout (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the numerous sources include YouTube and obvious non-WP:RS sources, so that needs fixing too. It's clearly notable, but the point of draft pages is to get the page up to article standard, not just to move it back with tags saying it's not up to scratch.

If you decide to move it back, that's up to you, and I won't delete it, but bear in mind that it had been nominated for deletion by another editor, so your call Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, since you have reviewed SpaceX Starship article, I think you might want to review it again, but this time checking grammar and such. I am very terrible at grammar as you might have know, so copyediting would be immensely helpful. Thanks! CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 00:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@CactiStaccingCrane: Sure, I'll leave comments on the peer review page tomorrow, maybe I'll fix the easier mistakes myself. Thanks for reaching out. RealKnockout (talk) 01:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RealKnockout: Thanks a lot! CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 01:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Wareon (talk) 02:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Have nothing but respect for you for your valiant efforts on AfD - Pakistan. Wassalam and Best Regards... Ngrewal1 (talk) 23:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salam and thank you very much sir for your appreciation, it is very kind. RealKnockout (talk) 12:35, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Thank you for spotting a ton of grammar mistakes in SpaceX Starship! CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 01:23, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Utopia Deals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Utopia Deals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bbarmadillo (talk) 09:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article China–Pakistan Free Trade Agreement you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah (talk) 22:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see you active again! You might want to check out SpaceX Starship if you want to start copyediting with uncontroversial articles :) CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article China–Pakistan Free Trade Agreement you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:China–Pakistan Free Trade Agreement for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah (talk) 16:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:11, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RealKnockout. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Motawif (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RealKnockout. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Motawif".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Salam, This is Masood Lohar. I am the founder of Clifton Urban Forest. First of all thank you for writing our profile on the wiki. I just wish to inform you that a lot more is done at the forest and it needs to be updated. The total number of trees is 700,000 of 83 species. etc. My cell is 03000300503. I request you update it.

warm regards Masood 2404:3100:1442:54C4:858F:CE0A:5A28:A057 (talk) 09:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:9th Joint Coordination Committee Meeting Islamabad.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 14:16, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]