Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Undisputed World Bboy Series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete ("snow close"). This is essentially a repost of the material that was deleted at the last discussion and I've cautioned the editor about reposting material without going through deletion review. If anyone wants this to go through another week I'll reopen this, but this will pretty much be the same discussion since the series has only run for one year (2014). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:21, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Undisputed World Bboy Series

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to be an offshoot of Undisputed World Bboy Series, which was deleted as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Undisputed World Bboy Series. There is no indication of notability, no significant coverage from reliable secondary sources, and this article is wholly dependent on the deleted main article. The subject may be notable one day, but not just yet. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:27, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Snow talk 05:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Snow talk 05:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per reasoning and consensus found in the last discussion; despite efforts, no appropriate independent or secondary reliable sources found to establish notability for this competition under WP:GNG and WP:EVENT and what (unsourceable) content is there is not encyclopedic material but rather a collection of entirely uncontextualized names and tournament trees. The only prose that is to be found is in the "lead", which reads more like a promotional flyer. Pretty open and shut on this one too -- arguably more so. Snow talk 05:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This is essentially a repost of the first article, just with it specifying 2014. It's the only competition they've held thus far, so the chance that this will end any differently than the one for the main page is almost non-existent. The content is pretty much identical and unless anyone opposes I'm going to close this early. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.