Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climatocredule

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 12:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Climatocredule

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOT#DICT, should this be deleted or transwiki'd to English/French wiktionary? Tom Meakin (talk) 16:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:NEO and WP:DICDEF. Based on the lack of Google results, I'd say there's a fair chance that it was made up. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:04, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.